[00:00:02]
[Call to Order]
UH, CALL THIS MEETING OF THE PARKER COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO ORDER ON THE NINE 26TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023.UH, LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT WE DO HAVE A QUORUM WITH THE COUNTY CLERK AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PRESENT.
UH, THE AGENDA HAS BEEN POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW.
UH, WE WILL BEGIN WITH AN INVOCATION LED BY LINDE LINDEL HOLLOWAY FROM FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE, LED BY PARKER COUNTY, JUDGE PROAM.
COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY, PLEASE STAND.
GOD, WE JUST THANK YOU FOR THIS DAY AND WE THANK YOU FOR THIS LEADERSHIP THAT YOU'VE GIVEN TO OUR COUNTY.
WE PRAY THAT YOU WOULD BLESS THEM AND LEAD THEM AS THEY LEAD OUR COUNTY.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC WHERE STAND ONE NATION UNDER OUT INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE, TEXAS STATE UNDER GOD.
[4. CONSENT]
TO ITEM FOUR ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.UNDER ITEMS A, UH, ITEMS TWO, THREE, AND FOUR ITEMS B, ONE AND THREE AND ITEMS C, ITEMS ONE, TWO, AND THREE O ASK FOR MOTION.
I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT ITEMS. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.
ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH, WE'LL GO TO ITEM D ONE ON INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS OF EQUIPMENT.
[4.D.2. Approve the salvage/destruction of tablet and desks with hutch. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)]
APPROVE THE SALVAGE DESTRUCTION OF TABLET AND, UH, DESK WITH HUTCH.KIM PURCHASING IS REQUESTING THAT A SURFACE PRO ASSET TAG NUMBER 1 8 8 7 7 FROM THE DA'S OFFICE BE SALVAGED FOR DESTRUCTION.
SURFACE PRO HAS A NON-REMOVABLE STORAGE AND IT IS UNABLE TO WIPE IT AND ENSURE INFORMATION SAFETY.
UM, WE'VE ALSO REQUESTING THAT TWO L-SHAPED DESK WITH HUTCHES BE DESTROYED DUE TO THE CONDITION THEY WERE PRESENTED TO SURPLUS, THE DISC DESKS HAVE BEEN SITTING OUTSIDE UNDER AN AWNING BEFORE COMING TO SURPLUS, AND SO THEY ARE THE PRESS PARTICLE BOARD AND, UM, COMPLETELY RUINED.
MOTION BE, EXCUSE ME, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN AND SAY GOODBYE.
[4.D.3. Surplus Property List & Authorization inclusion in an online Auction scheduled for January 8, 2024 through January 19, 2024. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]
GOOD.ITEM THREE, SURPLUS PROPERTY LIST AND AUTHORIZATION INCLUSION IN AN ONLINE AUCTION SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 8TH, 2024 THROUGH JANUARY 19TH, 2024 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION THAT THE LIST THAT'S PROVIDED FOR Y'ALL OF AUCTION ITEMS BE, UM, APPROVED TO ALLOW FOR THE AUCTION OF THESE ITEMS ON THE JANUARY 8TH THROUGH JANUARY 19TH.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR PASS.
[4.D.4. Request approval and execution of the Mooring Restoration Services Change Order #4. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]
GOOD.ITEM FOUR, REQUEST THE APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF THE MOORING RESTORATION SERVICES CHANGE ORDER NUMBER FOUR, REQUESTING APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF THE MOORING RESTORATION SERVICES CHANGE ORDER NUMBER FOUR AND THE AMOUNT OF $1,495 AND 5 CENTS.
THIS IS TO ADD ADDITIONAL DOOR SUITES TO THE EXTERIOR GLASS FRONT DOORS RELATED TO THE ANNEX ANNEX BUILDING DAMAGED ON THE DECEMBER 23RD 22 FREEZE EVENT.
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON THIS? I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.
FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
[4.D.5. Accept / Reject / Renew PC24-18 Aggregate Road Materials. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]
EXCEPT REJECT RENEW PC 24 DASH 18.AGGREGATE ROAD MATERIALS RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED FROM SIX VENDORS FOR PC 24 DASH 18.
AGGREGATE ROAD MATERIALS FOR PARKER COUNTY.
THIS CONTRACT PERIOD BEGINS JANUARY 15TH, 2024 THROUGH JANUARY 14TH, 2025.
UM, ADDITIONAL MATERIALS WERE OFFERED BY VARIOUS VENDORS AND HAS BEEN PASSED TO ACTION OF THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO AWARD TO ALL RESPONDING BIDDERS AND TO ALLOW EACH COMMISSIONER TO USE ONE OR ALL AT THEIR DISCRETION BASED ON NEED AND LOCATION OF THE PRECINCT.
THE DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF PRICING AND UTILIZE THE VENDOR THAT IS THE BEST PRICE AND VALUE FOR THEIR COUNTY, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE RESPONSIVE VENDORS INCLUDE ZACH PEK, BP AND K STONE, BULKING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, KIWI MINING GROUP, BIG CITY CRUSH, CONCRETE, AND DFW MATERIALS.
I'M GONNA MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE, UH, APPROVE ALL OF THOSE VENDORS SO THAT WE COULD USE WHOEVER.
MOTION WILL BE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN AND SAY TO COMMISSIONER HOLTON.
DOES ANYBODY HERE USE P AND K STONE? UH, PRE PRECINCT FOUR,
[00:05:01]
USE TWO.STEVE WOULD USE THEM SOMEWHAT.
I DON'T THINK WE'D USE THEM MUCH.
THEY DO OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT TO, UM, THE CSR TWO AND THE CRS TWO H.
UM, THAT IS A, UH, PATENTED PRODUCT.
IT'S NOT THE SAME BASIC MATERIAL, BUT IT DOES THE SAME JOB.
SO THEY, THEY CLAIM A SOLE SOURCE ON IT.
IF, IF IT COMES TO THAT, YOU DON'T WANT TO ADD IT TO THIS BID, BUT WOULD SOMETHING COMES UP AND YOU NEED TO UTILIZE A PRODUCT AND THE OTHERS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, UM, YOU COULD USE IT THROUGH THEIR SALES SOURCE OR THROUGH TARRANT COUNTY BID.
COMMISSIONER, YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THAT? NO.
UH, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? PASS LEVEL.
DO YOU WANT THAT LEFT OFF OR IT'S FINE? LEAVE IT.
[4.D.6. Accept / Reject / Renew PC24-19 Petroleum Asphalt Products. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]
MOVE TO ITEM SIX AND ACCEPT, REJECT, RENEW PC 24 DASH 19 PETROLEUM ASPHALT PRODUCTS RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED FROM FOUR VENDORS ON PC 24 DASH 19 FOR PETROLEUM ASPHALT FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD BEGINNING FEBRUARY 1ST, 2024 THROUGH JANUARY 31ST, 2025.AGAIN, ADDITIONAL MATERIALS WERE OFFERED BY THE VARIOUS VENDORS AND ALSO THE ACTION OF THE COURT HAS BEEN TOWARDS ALL RESPONDING VENDORS.
UM, SAME AS ON THE AGGREGATE ROAD MATERIALS.
WE RECOMMEND THAT THE DEPARTMENTS BE MINDFUL OF THE PRICING RESPONSIVE VENDORS INCLUDE ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS ROAD RECYCLERS, ROT, ASPHALT PRODUCTS, AND P TWO EMULSIONS PLANS.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS.
[4.D.7. Accept / Reject / Renew RFPQ PC23-39 Parker County Transportation Bond Program Management and Design Engineering Services. (Kim Rivas / Commissioner Walden) ]
SEVEN, RE ACCEPT, REJECT, RENEW, P-R-F-P-Q, PC 23 DASH 39, PARKER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION, BOND MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES.UH, WE ALSO HAVE, UH, REPRESENTATIVES FROM FRIES AND NICHOLS HERE, UH, THAT I THINK WILL WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS AS WELL.
RESPONSES BOARD RECEIVED FROM FOUR FIRMS FOR RFPQ, PC 23 DASH 39, PARKER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE 2023 BOND, UM, ELECTION FUNDS.
UH, THE COURT APPOINTED AN EVALUATION COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF COMMISSIONER LARRY WALDEN, COMMISSIONER GEORGE CONLEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY JOHN FORREST, TREASURER BECKY MCCULLOUGH, AUDITOR BRIANNA FOWLER AND PURCHASING AGENT KIM RIVAS.
UM, THE COMMITTEE NARROWED DOWN THE RESPONSES TO A SHORT LIST OF TWO, INCLUDING FRIESA NICHOLS AND WESTWOOD ENGINEERS, AND THEY MADE PRESENTATIONS TO THIS COMMITTEE ON DECEMBER 12TH, 2023.
AS A RESULT OF THE PRESENTATIONS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS AWARD TO FREEZA NICHOLS TO COMMISSIONER'S COURT AND REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND PURCHASING AGENT TO BEGIN NEGOTIATIONS OF THE CONTRACT.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALTER WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY.
UH, IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE SITE BEFORE WE GO? IT WAS UNANIMOUS.
THERE WAS NOT, UH, THERE WAS NOT ANY RIGHT QUESTION.
IT, COMMISSIONER CONNELLY, YOU.
AND IT'S, UH, THE REASON THAT WE FELT LIKE IF WE WENT WITH THE OTHER COMPANY, WE'D BE GOING BACKWARDS INSTEAD OF FORWARDS BECAUSE THEY'VE ALREADY SET UP ALL THE, THE NEW BOND STUFF.
AND SO IT WAS, THERE WERE SEVERAL REASONS, BUT, UH, THAT'S THE MAIN ONE.
I THINK IT WAS A GOOD, GOOD, UH, EXERCISE BECAUSE IT GAVE US THE OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THINGS WE MIGHT LIKE TO WORK ON AND IMPROVE, HOWEVER, IT WAS UNANIMOUS.
I HAVE A COUPLE OF, OR I HAVE ONE QUESTION AND ONE JUST DISCUSSION POINT.
UM, DID WE DO ANY TYPE OF GRADING SYSTEM OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? I KNOW WE DID SOMETHING LIKE THAT WITH THE JUSTICE CENTER ISSUE THAT CAME UP RECENTLY.
DID WE DO ANYTHING LIKE THAT FOR THIS GRADING? THE, THE RESPONSES AND THE TWO COMPANIES? WELL, JUST ALL THE FOLKS WHO, WHO SUBMITTED A RESPONSE, SO I'LL ANSWER THAT FOR, FOR, UH, WE, WE DID GRADING FOR THE FOUR PROPOSALS, AND THEN WHEN IT CAME DOWN TO IT, UH, UH, WE DID NOT GRADE AMONG THE, THE TWO, THE FINALISTS.
AND, UH, WE JUST LISTENED TO THE PRESENTATIONS AND IT WAS PRETTY OBVIOUS IN OUR, UH, JUDGMENT THAT THERE'S A CLEAR CUT, UH, WINNER.
SO, NO, NOT FOR THE FINAL ONE, BUT WE DID FOR THE PREVIOUS ONE, WE EVALUATED THEM AS TO THEIR, UH, ABILITY TO PERFORM.
I SCRUTINIZED BOTH OF THOSE COMPANIES PRETTY GOOD.
AND WE, WE WOULD BE LOSING A LOT IF WE DON'T STAY WITH FREEZING NICHOLS.
YEAH, WE'D BE GOING BACKWARDS.
I FEEL LIKE, UM, JUST ON THE DISCUSSION PIECE, FREEZING NICHOLS HAS BEEN INCREDIBLY HELPFUL.
CHRIS HAS BEEN EXTREMELY HELPFUL.
DUSTIN'S BEEN EXTREMELY HELPFUL WORKING THROUGH THIS PROCESS.
AND SO I THINK THAT WE'VE ARRIVED AT A VERY GOOD CONCLUSION.
BUT I WOULD STRESS TO THE COURT AGAIN, THAT WHEN WE STRUCTURE THE CONTRACT, I'D LIKE IT TO BE BUILT IN SUCH THAT WE'RE NOT PUTTING ALL OF THE BURDEN ON FREEZING NICKELS, BUT INSTEAD THERE'S THE ABILITY TO
[00:10:01]
SUBCONTRACT OUT TO OTHER ENGINEERING FIRMS ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS.WELL, THE, THAT'S THE POINT THAT I HAVE.
I THINK THAT'S STILL COMING UP THOUGH IN THE NEGOTIATION PHASE.
WHAT WE GOT OUTTA THAT IS THEY DIDN'T WANT IT, EITHER ONE OF THEM DIDN'T WANT THE OTHER ONE'S HELP.
SO, WELL, DURING, DURING THE, UH, TOWN HALL MEETINGS, THERE'S PROBABLY 30 OF THOSE THINGS THAT, UM, I DON'T THINK FRIESA NICHOLS HAS THE CAPACITY OR ANY, ANY ENGINEERING FIRM FOR THAT MATTER, TO DO EVERY SINGLE THING THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE ON 32 PROJECTS.
I THINK IT'S GONNA TAKE A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT LED BY FRIESA NICHOLS TO HELP AND, AND, AND DETERMINE THOSE PARTNERS AND, AND WORKING WITH THE COMMISSIONERS, BECAUSE THE COMMISSIONER'S GONNA HAVE A BIG SAY IN THIS.
IS THAT CORRECT, CHRIS? AND SO, UH, GOING INTO THIS, IT WAS ALWAYS THE INTENT TO DO THAT, UH, TO GET THESE PROJECTS DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER, UH, WHICH IS 32 OF 'EM, WHICH IS UNPRECEDENTED, WHICH WE'VE NEVER DONE THAT BEFORE.
AND SO, UM, I I CAN HONESTLY SAY THAT HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR FRIESA NICHOLS, UM, THE BOND, I MEAN, WHETHER TO PASS OR NOT, THEY HAD AN INSTRUMENTAL IMPACT ON THAT BOND, UH, PASSING BECAUSE OF, OF, OF CHRIS BOSCO IN THOSE MEETINGS, UH, CAME VERY CREDIBLE, KNOWLEDGEABLE, AND BROUGHT A LOT OF CREDIBILITY TO THOSE MEETINGS.
AND SO I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU PERSONALLY FOR THAT AS WE DID THAT.
AND I, I KNOW I WORKED YOU TO DEATH AND KEPT YOU AWAY FROM YOUR FAMILY QUITE A BIT ON THAT, AND THANK YOU FOR THAT.
UM, DO Y'ALL, WOULD Y'ALL LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK ON THIS? WELL, UH, FIRST I'D LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU.
YOU KNOW, WE'VE, UH, ENJOYED, UH, WORKING ON THE LAST TWO BONDS AND APPRECIATE, UH, CONSIDERATION FOR, UH, MANAGING, UH, THIS BOND.
UH, I, I THINK COMMISSIONER HOLT, ONE OF THE THINGS WE PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE AND WE HAD IN OUR PROPOSAL IS THAT, UM, WE INTEND TO, RIGHT OUT OF THE GATE, START WITH A PROCUREMENT TO, UM, GET OTHER ENGINEERING FIRMS TO DO THE ON SYSTEM PROJECT.
SO THAT'S ALL THE I 27 30 AND 1187.
UH, AND SO THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, OUR, OUR PROPOSAL PLAN TO HOW TO GET OTHERS INVOLVED.
THOSE ARE VERY LARGE, UM, WITH A LOT OF ENGINEERING ON THOSE PROJECTS.
AND WE THOUGHT THAT THAT COULD BE A, UM, A, A THING TO BRING IN THAT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES, UH, TO THE POINTS YOU'VE MADE IN THE PAST.
UM, BUT YEAH, WE'RE, UM, YOU KNOW, ONCE AGAIN WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU.
WE, UM, YOU KNOW, HAVE, UH, THERE'S A LOT, LOT OF ACTIVITIES TO DO IN THE NEXT, UH, FEW MONTHS.
UM, YOU KNOW, ONE, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I THINK, UH, ON Y'ALL'S QUESTION ABOUT, YOU KNOW, UH, COMMISSIONER INPUT IS, UH, THE, THE FIRST STEP IS TO DO A PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN IN WHICH EACH COMMISSIONER WOULD APPROVE THE PLAN FOR THEIR PRECINCT.
UH, AND THEN ULTIMATELY THAT COMES FOR COURT APPROVAL.
AND THAT'S REALLY THE BASIS FOR THE PROGRAM GOING FORWARD IN TERMS OF MEETING SCHEDULE AND BUDGET.
UH, IT ALLOWS TO KIND OF SET THAT BASELINE AND, AND THAT, UH, AND THEN, UH, AS WE'VE DONE THE PAST PROGRAMS, EACH PROJECT'S INDIVIDUALLY VOTED ON, UH, BY THE COURT.
UH, SO THAT'S, WE KIND OF SET THE PLAN AND THEN, UM, EXECUTE EACH PROJECT INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE PRIORITIZATION OF THOSE PROJECTS AS WELL.
WELL, YOU, YOU, YOU, YOU BROUGHT THE BIG MAN HERE.
THANK YOU MR. GREER FOR COMING.
I'M NOT MUCH ELSE I CAN SAY OTHER THAN I'VE BEEN INVOLVED, UH, COMMITTING THE COMPANY.
I'M ALAN GREER WITH FREEZING NICHOLS, AND I'VE BEEN THE PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE, AND MY JOB IS TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE GETTING THE SERVICE AND THE RESOURCES YOU NEED.
AND I'M STILL HERE TO DO THAT.
UH, THAT'S WHY YOU GET TO SEE THIS GUY ALL THE TIME, AND I'M MAKING SURE HE'S GONNA BE THERE TO HELP YOU GUYS THROUGH THIS NEXT PROGRAM.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR, PASS FIVE VOTE.
[5.A. Precinct #3 will be on private property at the 3200 block of Fox Road for drainage and visibility. (Commissioner Walden)]
ITEM FIVE A ON PRE.THIS IS A NOTIFICATION ONLY PRECINCT THREE WILL BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AT THE 3,200 BLOCK OF FOX ROAD FOR DRAINAGE AND VISIBILITY.
UM, COMMISSIONER, YOU WANNA HAVE ANY ADD? THERE'S NOTHING ELSE TO ADD TO IT.
[6.A. Review/Approve amendment to the Parker County Incentive guidelines. (Judge Deen)]
SIX A ON REVIEW APPROVE AMENDMENT FOR THE PARKER COUNTY INCENTIVE GUIDELINES.UH, I BELIEVE WE HAVE CHRIS STRAYER HERE WITH THE PARKER COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL.
UH, WANTED TO DISCUSS THE INCENTIVE POLICY WITH YOU HERE, UH, A LITTLE BIT THIS MORNING.
UH, GET YOUR RECOMMENDATION ON, UH, HOW TO MOVE FORWARD.
ONE OF THE THINGS, I THINK YOU'LL HAVE A COPY OF WHAT,
[00:15:01]
UH, I PROVIDED YOU.THE FIRST THING IS JUST THE TITLE OF THE, OF THE POLICY ITSELF, UH, BEFORE IT WAS NAMED THE PROPERTY ABATEMENT, UH, INCENTIVE POLICY OR POLICY STATEMENT.
AND WHAT WE'RE DOING TODAY IS ADDING A 3 81, AND I'LL GET THAT TO THE IN A SECOND.
SO I WANT THE TITLE TO BE MORE INCLUSIVE OF BOTH THE, BOTH THE PROGRAMS. AND SO THAT'S WHY I CHANGED IT FROM PROPERTY, UH, ABATEMENT POLICY STATEMENT TO JUST INCENTIVE POLICY STATEMENT.
AND THEN IF YOU GO DOWN TO, UH, PAGE SIX, WE ADDED NEW LANGUAGE, UH, IN, FOR, UH, INCLUDING A CHAPTER 3 81 INCENTIVE PROGRAM.
UH, SO TRADITIONALLY THIS, UH, POLICY HAD JUST BEEN, LIKE I SAID BEFORE, PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS.
UH, AND SO ABATING THE PROPERTY TAXES, THE NEW PROPERTY TAXES FOR POTENTIAL PROJECT, UH, THE 3 81 POLICY, UH, AND PROGRAM THAT IS ACTUALLY A REBATE.
SO WHERE THE ABATEMENT, YOU WOULD NOT PAY THAT PORTION OF THE, UH, THE INCREASED TAX VALUE.
THE 3 81 PROGRAM IS THE, THE OWNER, THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD PAY THOSE TAXES AND THEN BE REBATED BACK THAT SAME PERCENTAGE.
SO THE PROGRAM, THE, THE RATES, THE TERMS, THEY ACT THE SAME.
UH, IT'S JUST A METHOD OF THE, UH, OF THE INCENTIVE, WHETHER YOU JUST DON'T PAY THAT PORTION OF IT, OR YOU DO PAY IT AND RECEIVE IT BACK IN THE FORM OF, UH, OF THAT, THAT REBATE.
UM, IT'S A PROGRAM THAT, UH, ALL COUNTIES HAVE AVAILABLE TO THEM, BUT MUCH LIKE THE PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT, UH, POLICY, WE NEED TO HAVE THAT LANGUAGE IN THE POLICY TO BE ABLE TO TAKE, UH, UH, ACTION ON THAT IF WE CHOOSE TO IN THE FUTURE.
SO THIS IS MORE OF JUST, UH, CALLED A, A HOUSEKEEPING, YOU KNOW, TYPE OF ITEM JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT THE RESOURCES THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO US, UH, THROUGH THE STATE GOVERNMENT, ARE IN OUR POLICY AND AVAILABLE FOR US TO USE IF, UH, IF WE CHOOSE TO DO SO.
NOW, THERE'LL BE OTHER THINGS THAT AS WE GO THROUGH THE, UH, COURSE OF THE YEAR, THAT I'LL PROBABLY BE BACK AND, AND WANT TO TALK WITH YOU ABOUT SOME OTHER, UH, POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES, UH, WITHIN THE INCENTIVE POLICY.
BUT, UH, FOR RIGHT NOW, I THINK THIS IS, UH, SOMETHING TO JUST GET US STARTED FOR THE, THE FIRST OF THE YEAR.
AND SO AGAIN, WE HAVE THOSE, UH, MECHANISMS IN PLACE.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY, UH, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALL, UH, AND DISCUSSION OF HAYS.
ANY DISCUSSION OF ITEM? ALL IN FAVOR, PASS FIVE HOURS.
[6.B. Discuss/Take action on the reappointment of Jerry Brooks to the ESD 3 Board. (Commissioner Holt) ]
B ON DISCUSS, TAKE ACTION ON THE REAPPOINTMENT OF JURY BROOKS, THE ESD THREE BOARD.UH, COMMISSIONER HOLT, I MET WITH MR. BROOKS AND HE WOULD LIKE TO BE REAPPOINTED TO THE ESD THREE BOARD.
UM, BY ALL ACCOUNTS, HE APPEARS TO BE WELL-INFORMED ON THE ISSUES, HAS A EX EXTENSIVE HISTORY IN, UH, FIRE PROTECTION AND THINGS LIKE, LIKE THAT.
SO I'M MAKING THE MOTION THAT WE REAPPOINT MR. JERRY BROOKS MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
[6.C. Discuss and take action on Deputy Constable 2 salary request. (Commissioner Holt) ]
GO TO ITEM C, DISCUSS AND TAKE ACTION ON DEPUTY CONSTABLE TWO SALARY REQUEST.I'D LIKE TO READ A STATEMENT FROM, UH, MR. JOE HARRIS, WHO IS THE CONSTABLE FOR PRECINCT TWO.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HE WOULD NORMALLY, UH, PRESENT, BUT I BELIEVE HE'S OUT OF TOWN WITH HIS FAMILY RIGHT NOW.
UH, HE WANTS TO FILL A CURRENT POSITION WITH A CURRENT COUNTY EMPLOYEE THAT IS ON THE ADOPTED LAW ENFORCEMENT STEP IN GRADE PAY SCALE.
THE POSITION WAS APPROVED AND IT TOOK EFFECT ON OCTOBER 1ST.
HE DOES CURRENTLY HAVE ENOUGH MONEY IN THIS LINE TO PAY FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR'S SALARY.
UM, THE POSITION WAS BUDGETED AT 65,342.
HOWEVER, THE PERSON THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO PUT INTO THAT POSITION, WHO IS CURRENTLY A PARKER COUNTY EMPLOYEE, IS CURRENTLY BEING PAID APPROXIMATELY 81,000.
THE DEPUTY, THE DEPUTY WILL BE WORKING WITH JUVENILES ON A REGULAR BASIS HANDLING WRIT OF ATTACHMENTS AND TRUANCY.
AND BECAUSE OF THAT NEED, UM, THE CONSTABLE FEELS LIKE IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE GET SOMEONE WHO'S EXPERIENCED THAT.
WE DON'T GET SOMEONE WHO'S KIND OF FRESH OUT OF, OR FRESH OFF OF, UH, YOU KNOW, THE ACADEMY OR THE STREETS OR WHATEVER.
AND THEREFORE, THAT'S WHY HE FEELS LIKE IT'S IMPORTANT TO GET SOMEBODY WHO HAS MORE EXPERIENCE, ESPECIALLY WITH KIDS, WHICH IS WHY THIS PERSON WOULD BE A GOOD FIT, HENCE THE HIGHER SALARY.
SO HE IS, UM, ASKING FOR CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THIS.
I BELIEVE HE SPOKE WITH MS. MCCULLOUGH ABOUT THIS AND, UM, I DON'T KNOW IF SHE HAS ANY INPUT ON THIS MATTER.
SO HE WANTED TO STAY AT THAT 80 SOMETHING THOUSAND, CORRECT? YES.
HE'S WANTING IT TO BE A LATERAL MOVE FOR THE SALARY.
SO HE DOESN'T WANT THEM TO TAKE A DECREASE IN PAY.
NOW, WHENEVER HE SAYS THAT THERE'S ALREADY MONEY IN THE LINE TO PAY FOR IT, THAT'S WHERE I JUST WANNA BE CLEAR, THE ONLY THE POSITION IS BUDGETED AT 65,342.
THE ONLY REASON WHY THAT THERE'S FLUFF IN
[00:20:01]
THE LINE IS BECAUSE THE POSITION HAS BEEN OPEN FOR THREE MONTHS.THIS IS NOT TYPICALLY SOMETHING THAT WE DO.
BECAUSE SAY WHAT HAPPENS IN THE NEXT BUDGET CYCLE, IF YOU SAY, WE'RE NOT GONNA INCREASE YOUR BUDGET AT ALL, SO WE'RE GONNA LOOK AND SEE WHAT'S THAT LINE BUDGETED AT IS AT 65,342, DOES HE TAKE A CUT AND PAY THEN? SO JUST BECAUSE THERE'S FLUFF IN THAT LINE, IF AN OUTSIDE AUDITOR WAS TO PULL THAT AND SAY, OKAY, THIS POSITION WAS APPROVED FOR OCTOBER ONE AT 65,342, WHY ARE YOU PAYING THEM $15,000 MORE THAN THAT? I JUST FEEL LIKE THERE SHOULD BE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.
UH, IT DON'T MAKE SENSE TO ME THAT, THAT IT, HE JUMPED TO 80 SOMETHING THOUSAND DOLLARS.
HE'S, HE'S CURRENTLY BEING PAID 81,000.
WELL, BUT HE NEEDS TO STAY THERE.
I MEAN, KIND OF THE EXAMPLE IS, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE LOTS OF POSITIONS THAT WERE, YOU KNOW, APPROVED FOR OCTOBER ONE, OR EVEN SOME OF YOU HERE HAVE OPEN POSITIONS, YOU KNOW, IN YOUR DEPARTMENTS.
DOES THAT NOW MEAN YOU'RE GONNA START LOOKING AND GOING, OH, WE'VE GOT $5,000 HERE SAVINGS THAT NOW WE'RE GONNA ADD ONTO THEIR SALARY? I GUESS WE COULD LOOK AND SEE IF THERE'S A PART-TIME LINE OVER THERE AND, AND TAKE THAT MONEY AND MOVE IT OVER.
THERE'S NOT
THE ONLY OTHER PLACE IT COULD COME FROM WOULD BE CONTINGENCY.
AND THAT'S WHERE, YOU KNOW, I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THE AUDITOR AND AS WELL AS CONSTABLE HARRIS AND SAID, THAT'S NOT TYPICALLY WHAT CONTINGENCY MONEY'S FOR.
COMMISSIONER HOL, CAN YOU CLARIFY A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE RESPONSIBILITY CHANGES FOR THIS INDIVIDUAL? AGAIN, CAN YOU GO OVER THAT AGAIN? SO THIS PERSON HAS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH THE JUVENILES CURRENTLY, AND THE POSITION FOR THE COUNTY AND THE POSITION THAT THE CONSTABLE'S TRYING TO FILL WOULD DEAL WITH CHILDREN ON A INDIVIDUAL BASIS AS A HIGH DEGREE OR HIGH PERCENTAGE OF HIS REGULAR JOB FUNCTION.
AND THAT'S WHY MCC CONSTABLE HAS HAD SOME EXTENSIVE CONVERSATIONS WITH, UH, WITH MS. MCCULLOUGH AND UNDERSTANDS THOSE POINTS.
BUT FEELS LIKE IN THIS CASE, GIVEN THE SENSITIVITY OF THE ISSUE, GIVEN THE SPECIAL, UM, TYPE OF RESPONSIBILITIES WORKING WITH CHILDREN, IT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT PERSON.
AND IN HIS OPINION, HE ALREADY HAS THE RIGHT PERSON WHO'S WORKING AT THE COUNTY.
HE DOESN'T WANT TO HAVE THAT PERSON TAKE A SIGNIFICANT PAY CUT.
SO IF WE DON'T DO THIS, WHAT HAPPENS THEN? WHAT'S THE OPTION? I THINK WE'D NEED TO ASK, UH, THE CONSTABLE ABOUT THAT.
AND THAT'S WHY I, I TALKED TO THE CONSTABLE AND I SAID, THIS NEEDS TO BE DECIDED BEFOREHAND.
I'M LIKE, 'CAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T DO THIS ON THE ASSUMPTION.
AND THEN THINK COURT'S GONNA GIVE 'EM THE MONEY.
I WAS LIKE, YOU NEED TO ADDRESS THIS FIRST.
'CAUSE IT MAY MEAN THAT THE PERSON DOESN'T ACCEPT THE POSITION.
I THINK I THOUGHT THEY WERE IN THE EIGHTIES ALSO, BUT NO, USED TO BE NO.
IN THE LAST FEW YEARS THERE'S ARIES HAVE GONE UP.
I JUST DON'T SEEM RIGHT, BUT I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE, THE DEAL IS.
I MEAN, UH, HE'S GOT EXPERIENCE, BUT MAN, THE, THE PERSON THAT IS CURRENTLY ON THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE STEP AND GRADE, WHICH THAT INCLUDES BAILIFFS, CONSTABLES, SHERIFF'S, DEPUTIES, UM, ANY OF THE GUNS AND BADGES FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
SO THE CONSTABLE VIEWS US AS A LATERAL MOVE.
YOU KNOW, THEY'RE BEYOND THE SAME EXACT PAY SCALE AS THEY ALREADY ON.
WHERE'D YOU SAY HE'S WORKING AT NOW? WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE? I KNOW WHAT DOING WHAT? UH, HE'S WORKING WITH THE KIDS.
OH, WE DON'T NEED TO TALK ABOUT THE EMPLOYEE DIRECTLY, HONESTLY, BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, DECISIONS STILL NEED TO BE MADE IF THE POSITION'S GONNA BE ACCEPTED.
A LOT OF THAT IS GONNA DEPEND ON DECISION TODAY.
SO I DON'T WANNA GO TOO MUCH IN DETAIL.
HAS ENOUGH INFORMATION BEEN PRESENTED FOR US TO MAKE A MOTION? I THINK SO.
THEN I'M MAKING THE MOTION TO UN APPROVE.
NO, THAT'S, THAT'S MY OPINION.
AND WE, THERE'S FOUR O THERE'S FOUR OTHER COMMISSIONERS HERE THAT COMPOSE OF FIVE MEMBER COURT.
UM, YOU, YOU MIGHT MOTION ANY TIME.
SO, BUT I GUESS WE'RE NOW IN
I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT COMMISSIONER, UM, MOTIONS MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOL A SECOND MADE, UH, SECOND IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? YES.
UH, WHAT'S YOUR RECOMMENDATION? IF IT'S APPROVED, THEN JUST DON'T SPIN IT AROUND.
IF IT'S APPROVED, I RECOMMEND THERE NEEDS TO BE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TO COVER THE DIFFERENCE.
THAT WAY IF AN OUTSIDE AUDITOR LOOKS AT IT, THEY'RE GONNA SAY, WHY DID YOU ALLOW A SALARY THAT'S BUDGETED
[00:25:01]
AT THIS TO BE PAID HERE? CORRECT.SO WHETHER OR NOT THAT COMES FROM CONTINGENCY, THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY PLACE TO TAKE IT FROM.
MY FEAR IS THAT SETS A PRECEDENT FOR OTHER DEPARTMENTS TO COME FORWARD.
AND NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN WE WANNA START GIVING RAISES FROM CONTINGENCY.
THAT IS NOT WHAT CONTINGENCY IS FOR.
SO IF THAT'S WHAT'S DONE, I JUST THINK IT SHOULD BE CLEAR.
THE REASON FOR THIS IS BECAUSE THEY'RE JUST CURRENTLY ON THE SAME PAY SCALE WITHIN THE LAST TWO MONTHS.
WE ALLOWED DEPARTMENTS TO TAKE MONEY FROM PART-TIME YES.
EMPLOYEE LINES AND MOVE IT TO GIVE RAISES TO THOSE EMPLOYEES, CORRECT? YES.
THAT WAS MONEY THAT WAS ALREADY IN THEIR BUDGET IN THAT DEPARTMENT'S BUDGET THAT WAS ALLOWED.
THESE, HE DOESN'T HAVE IT IN HIS BUDGET THIS MUCH TO COVER IT.
SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE, I UNDERSTAND.
I JUST DON'T SEE MUCH DIFFERENCE.
WE ALLOWED, WE ALLOWED MONEY TO BE TAKEN FROM A PART-TIME LINE THAT THERE WASN'T A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE AND ADDED AND GIVE, I GAVE A RAISE TO EMPLOYEES WITH THAT MONEY.
AND THAT WAS A PRECEDENT WHEN THAT WAS DONE.
BUT THIS IS, THIS IS COMING FROM CONTINGENCY.
SO IN MY OPINION, UNDERSTAND THAT, I'M JUST SAYING CONTINGENCIES USED FOR DIFFERENT REASONS.
THIS, THIS IS COMING FROM CONTINGENCY NEXT BUDGET CYCLE IF EVERYTHING ELSE STAYS THE SAME, JUST TO BE REAL CLEAR, RIGHT NOW, THIS DEPARTMENT HAS ENOUGH FUNDS IN THAT PAYROLL LINE TO PAY OUT THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR.
SO FROM, IF THIS PERSON WERE TO BE HIRED FROM THAT POINT TO OCTOBER 1ST, 2024, THEY HAVE ENOUGH MONEY IN THE LINES TO PAY THAT OUT.
WHAT MS. MCCULL IS SAYING ABOUT CON CONTINGENCY IS WE COULD DO THAT NOW, OR IF NOTHING ELSE CHANGES, THEN IT WOULD HAVE TO BE PULLED, I GUESS FROM CONTINGENCY NEXT YEAR.
I THINK YOU WERE CALLING THAT FLUFF.
THAT THAT'S IN THERE RIGHT NOW.
UM, BRIAN WOULD LIKE BE TO SAY THAT BUDGET ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE NOW, BUT I AGREE THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE NOW, NOW, YES, THERE'S BUDGET AND ACTUALS.
SO AT THE END OF THE YEAR, IT'S GONNA SHOW SOME ROLLOVER.
UM, BUT NORMALLY, YOU KNOW, YOU CANNOT APPROPRIATE, APPROPRIATE PAST, UM, YOU KNOW, THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR.
AND SO AS BECKY HAS SAID, YOU KNOW, MOVING IT FROM CONTINGENT CONTINGENCY TO SHOW THAT THAT LINE IS FULLY FUNDED FOR THAT POSITION IS WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN.
'CAUSE IT'S EITHER YOU GET TO A POINT WHERE THEN NEXT YEAR THAT PERSON IS EITHER TAKING A PAY CUT OR THEN YOU'RE DOING IT.
SO IT'S JUST CLEANER TO MOVE IT.
AND, AND THE OTHER EXAMPLE THAT I GAVE ARE THOSE, UH, THOSE JOBS GONNA GO BACK TO THE COURT APPROVED SALARIES THAT THEY WERE THIS LAST BUDGET YEAR.
THE ONES THAT GOT THE RAISE FROM THE PART-TIME LINES, ARE THEY GONNA GO BACK? ARE THEY GONNA GO BACK? OR, OR DID THEY GET A RAISE DURING THE BUDGET YEAR? THEY, I MEAN, YES, THEY'RE GETTING A RAISE DURING THE BUDGET YEAR, HOWEVER, THERE WAS A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT THAT WAS BUDGETED.
AND SO AT THAT POINT, THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY, YOU KNOW, FOR THE ONES WHERE IT WAS A PART-TIME LINE, THEY, THEY DON'T HAVE FUNDS APPROPRIATED FOR A PART-TIME.
SO THEN GOING FORWARD, IF THEY WANTED PART-TIME BUDGET, THEY WOULD HAVE TO THEN COME AND REQUEST THAT.
'CAUSE AT THIS POINT IT'S GONE.
AND THEN THE OTHER ONES, IT WAS JUST, YOU KNOW, BETWEEN THE TWO LINES.
SO IT, IT WAS IN THERE, IT WAS JUST MOVING IT TO A DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT LINE THERE.
YOUR HONOR, I THINK THE DIFFERENCE IS IS, IS THAT'S ZEROED OUT.
SO NEXT YEAR YOU'RE NOT INCURRING ANY ADDITIONAL EXPENSE THIS YEAR, CORRECT? RIGHT.
YOU WOULDN'T NEXT YEAR YOU WOULD ON THE ONE THAT WE'RE PRESENTING TODAY.
SO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO BUDGETS, ONE INCREASES NEXT YEAR, ONE DOESN'T.
SO IF NEXT YEAR, THOSE PART-TIME POSITIONS ARE NOT FUNDED, WERE THOSE SALARIES REVERT BACK TO WHAT THEY WERE AS THEY WERE SET BY COURT? OR ARE THEY NOW SET AT THE NEW LEVEL? THEY'RE NOW SET AT THE NEW LEVEL AS AS IT WAS SET BY COMMISSIONER'S COURT.
ANYTHING ELSE? ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? I'D LIKE, CAN YOU CLARIFY AGAIN, THE ADDITI, IS THERE ADDITIONAL DUTIES ADDED TO, HI, THIS POSITION OR THIS CHANGE SINCE WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL.
THIS IS A NEWLY CREATED POSITION, UM, THAT WAS BUDGETED FOR, FOR THE CURRENT CALENDAR YEAR OR FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR.
JUST NOT AT THE AMOUNT THAT THIS PERSON WHO WOULD BE A LATERAL TRANSFER ACCORDING TO THE CONSTABLE, UM, WOULD REQUIRE.
BUT THE, THE RESPONSIBILITIES, LIKE I SAID, ARE WITH TRUANCY AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO YOU'RE GONNA BE WORKING WITH KIDS ONE-ON-ONE QUITE A BIT.
DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, COMMISSIONER? YEAH.
BEING THE FIRST YEAR HERE AND NOT HAVING A LOT OF EXPERIENCE WITH THIS, YOU KNOW, I'M USED TO BUDGETS BEING SET FOR A REASON.
UM, I KNOW CERTAIN THINGS WILL COME UP.
UM, I'D LIKE SOME MORE IN DEPTH ON
[00:30:01]
WHY A CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL'S WORTH 15, MAYBE 20,000 MORE WHEN YOU ADD IN THE BENEFITS FOR THAT POSITION THAN WHAT WAS BUDGETED.WELL AGAIN, IT'S BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THE EMPLOYEE CURRENTLY MAKES UNDERST UNDERSTAND THAT.
AND IT'S ON STEP IN GRADE AND THEN SWITCHING DEPARTMENTS, IT WOULD BE THE EXACT SAME STEP IN GRADE POSITION.
SO IT JUST COMES DOWN TO EITHER TO AVOID THESE CONVERSATIONS, WE EITHER START BUDGETING THESE PEOPLE SUPER HIGH EVERY YEAR AND YOU DON'T WANNA DO THAT, OR UNFORTUNATELY YOU HAVE TO HAVE THESE CONVERSATIONS.
WE BUDGETED FOR A FIRST YEAR PERSON AND WE'RE BRINGING IN A 12 YEAR PERSON.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION WITH THIS ITEM? ALL IN FAVOR? WE JUST NEED TO CLARIFY IF IT'S GONNA BE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FROM CONTINGENCY.
JUST LET IT DO IT FOR HIM TOO.
[6.D. Discuss/Take action/Approve county judge to execute final Advance Funding Agreement 0171-03-077. (Commissioner Holt) ]
MOVE TO ITEM D ON DISCUSSION.APPROVE COUNTY JUDGE, EXECUTE FINAL ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT.
UH, COMMISSIONER HOLT, THIS IS FOR THE 1 99 IN VILLE CUTOFF, UH, WORK.
AND MR. BOSCO, I THINK YOU WERE WILLING TO SPEAK ON THIS JUST A LITTLE BIT.
I SHOULD HAVE PUT THAT UP RIGHT UP FOR THE OTHER ONE.
SO THIS IS, UM, THIS IS 1 99 IN VILLE CUTOFF.
UH, IT WAS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS.
UM, IF Y'ALL REMEMBER, WE GOT, UH, $930,000 OF, UH, FEDERAL FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT.
UH, IT WAS THE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM THAT TECH STOCK HAS.
AND, UM, SO, UH, WITH EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT, UH, WE'VE ALREADY COMPLETED THE PLANS.
UM, IF YOU RECALL ON, UH, NOVEMBER THIRTEENTH'S COURT, UH, Y'ALL APPROVED, UH, THE ENGINEERING CONTRACT, WE WERE FINALIZING THE PLANS AT THAT POINT.
AND SO, UH, YOU'LL SEE AT THE BACK OF THAT AGREEMENT, IT BASICALLY STATES THAT THAT'S THE, THE PART THAT, UH, PARKER COUNTY'S PROVIDING IS THE PLANS.
AND SO THOSE HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO TECH STOCK.
UH, WE DID THAT AT THE END OF NOVEMBER.
UH, SO WITH APPROVAL OF THIS AGREEMENT, UH, TECH STOCK WILL, WILL SEND THE FINAL ONE FOR THE JUDGE'S SIGNATURE.
AND THEN, UH, ONE THING TO NOTE THAT'S DIFFERENT THAN SOME OF THE OTHER ONES IS THEY'RE BUILDING THE JOB.
SO ONCE Y'ALL APPROVE THIS, WE DELIVER THE PLANS, THEY'RE GONNA BUILD IT.
AND SO THERE'S NO MORE, UH, ACTIVITY FROM THE COUNTY SIDE.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
UM, IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALL IN FAVOR.
[6.E.1. Recommendation from the Subdivision Regulations Committee to implement RV Park Regulations. .]
MOVE TO ITEM E ON REQUEST TO ADOPT THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE CURRENT PARKER COUNTY SUBDIVISION'S RULES AND REGULATIONS AND TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY.I THINK, I THINK LAST TIME WE THANK YOU MR. BOSCO.
I THINK LAST TIME WE TOOK THESE ONE BY ONE, SO PROBABLY SHOULD DO THE SAME AGAIN.
IS THAT RIGHT, MR. FORST? OKAY.
SO FOR E ONE, THE RECOMMENDATION WAS UNANIMOUS FROM THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS COMMITTEE TO ADOPT RV PARK REGULATIONS VERY SIMILAR TO PAL PINTO.
UM, IT WAS UNANIMOUS DECISION AFTER TWO OR THREE SESSIONS OF DISCUSSION.
UM, AND MR. BRONNER'S HERE TO, UH, IF YOU DON'T MIND, GIVE US JUST REAL QUICK HIGHLIGHTS ABOUT WHY WE'RE DOING THIS, ET CETERA.
UH, BASICALLY PUBLIC SAFETY, SEWER, PUBLIC HEALTH, THE WHOLE DEAL.
I MEAN, ALL, ALMOST ALL THESE RV PARKS ARE THE, THE, THEY'RE, THEY'RE FAILING AS FAR AS SEWER.
UH, WE GOT PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES, FIRES, NONE OF 'EM HAVE MARKED.
THEY, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T HAVE, THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS.
SO IF SOMEBODY CALLS 9 1 1, YOU KNOW, THEY GET THERE AND THERE'S A HUNDRED RV, YOU KNOW, THEY DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY'RE GOING.
BUT I MEAN, THAT'S KIND OF THE, THE QUICK AND DOWN AND DIRTY.
ALSO FROM A PUBLIC SAFETY, SAFETY STANDPOINT, UH, THE FIRE CHIEFS CROSS PARKER COUNTY SUPPORT, UH, THIS, UH, RV PARK RULES AS WELL.
UH, THERE ARE SOME VERY NICE ITEMS IN THERE TO HELP FURTHER PUBLIC SAFETY.
OKAY, MR. STEERS, ANYTHING TO ADD FOR, UH, MR. HEISER? ANYTHING TO ADD? WE'RE VOTING ON THIS NUMBER ONE.
SO THE MOTION IS TO ADOPT THE RV PARK REGULATIONS AS PRESENTED.
I THINK, UH, MR. HUGHES EMAILED THEM OUT TO Y'ALL, AND IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO PAL PINTO'S, BUT JUST RECONFIGURED OVER TO PARKER COUNTY LANGUAGE.
[00:35:01]
ALL FOR DOING THIS, BUT THERE'S SOME ITEMS IN HERE I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT.WELL, LET, LET ME, WE HAVE A MOTION, UH, BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
WE'RE IN THE DISCUSSION PHASE.
UH, THE SCREENING PART, I CALL IT, I'D LIKE TO CALL IT BENSON, BUT WE'RE CALLING A SCREEN.
IT DOESN'T SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO SCREEN THE WHOLE PARK IN THIS PARAGRAPH HERE.
I LIKE TO HAVE THAT CHANGED WHERE YOU HAVE TO SCREEN THE WHOLE RV PART.
I, I BELIEVE THAT THAT, UM, I, I LOOKED TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY.
CAN, CAN THEY MAKE CHANGES ON THE FLY AND THEN ADOPT THE WHOLE DOCUMENT WE CAN WITH THE AMENDMENTS TO THAT PARTICULAR MOTION.
CAN YOU, UH, TELL ME WHAT PAGE THAT'S ON, SIR? UH, 10.
I'D LIKE TO AMEND MY MOTION TO ACCOMMODATE COMMISSIONER CONLEY'S REQUEST THAT THE SCREENING BE FOR THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE FACILITY.
I, I HAD, UH, A POINT I WANNA DISCUSS AS WELL.
IT'S ON PAGE THREE UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE.
UM, I THINK THE LAST PART WHERE IT SAYS, AND OTHER MEMBERS, IT MAY BE APPOINTED BY THE PARKER COUNTY JUDGE.
I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT SHOULDN'T BE LIKE A LOT OF THE OTHER APPOINTMENTS WHERE IT COMES BEFORE THE COURT.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAYBE HAVE THAT CHANGED.
THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT, THAT WAS ONE OF THOSE ITEMS THAT CAME STRAIGHT FROM PAL PINTO.
UH, I'D ALSO LIKE TO AMEND MY MOTION YEAH.
TO ACCOMMODATE COMMISSIONER HALE'S REQUEST.
SHOULD BE ON PAGE THREE AMONGST ALL OF US, UM, TO HAVE THAT CHOICE.
DO YOU NEED THE READERS DIGEST THAT AMENDMENT PLEASE? HE, HE WANTS TO HAVE IT COME BEFORE COURT INSTEAD OF JUST THE JUDGE.
THE LAST, THE LAST SENTENCE SAYS, AND OTHER MEMBERS THAT MAY BE APPOINTED BY THE COUNTY JUDGE.
APPOINTED BY COMMISSIONER'S COURT.
ANYTHING FURTHER? WE HAVE MOTION.
AGAIN, A SECOND'S MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? I LIKE THE REST OF IT.
OH, UH, WHERE DID MR. BRONER GOES? IS THERE SOMETHING ON THERE THAT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT ON THE, THE WHO'S GRANDFATHER AND WHO'S NOT? AND WHEN IT STARTS, AND I MEAN, GET MR. CHE'S OPINION, UH, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, UNLESS, YOU KNOW, GET UP THERE AND GET HIS OPINION.
UH, SO THE WAY TCQ LOOKS AT IT, YOU MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT.
WE REVIEW PLANNING MATERIALS AND GIVE AN AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT.
ONCE IT'S CONSTRUCTED, THEN THE, THAT'S WHEN THE PERMIT'S ISSUED.
SO WHAT WE HAVE NOW IS WE HAVE ABOUT SEVEN THAT ARE IN THE REVIEW FOR MATERIAL STAGE.
DOES THAT CONSTITUTE GRANDFATHERING OR DOES THAT CONSTITUTE NEW RULES? AND I THINK I'LL HAVE TO RESEARCH THAT BECAUSE I DON'T WANNA SAY OFF THE CUFF JUST, AND GIVE A WRONG ANSWER.
MY, MY FIRST UH, OPINION MIGHT BE THAT, YOU KNOW, ONCE THEY'RE IN, THEY'RE UNDER THE OLD LAW, OLD RULES.
I, BUT WE, YOU KNOW, WITH TCQ, THEY'RE STILL GOT TO MEET STATE STANDARDS.
SO IT'S NOT THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO MEET STATE STANDARDS FOR SEWER OSSF RULES.
'CAUSE CURRENTLY THEY HAVE TO MEET THOSE ANYWAY AND GET PERMITTING IF IT'S OVER A CERTAIN NUMBER.
BUT THEY WOULDN'T, BUT THEY WOULD NOT BE, THERE WOULD BE NO SOURCES.
THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO PUT A FENCE UP THOSE SEVEN, THEY WOULDN'T PUT A FENCE OR FIRE SAFETY OR ANY OF THIS NATURE.
SO, AND RIGHT NOW THEY, THAT SAYS PERMITTED RV PARKS, RIGHT NOW, THESE, THEY'RE NOT BUILT, THEY'RE NOT PERMITTED.
THEY'RE JUST REVIEW FOR SEWER.
AND WHAT I THINK WE CAN DO IS I, I'LL REVIEW THAT, THE LEGALITIES OF IT.
'CAUSE I, I CAN'T GIVE AN ANSWER OFF THE CUFF ON THAT PARTICULAR ITEM TODAY AT THIS POINT.
BUT I WOULD IMAGINE FOR FIRE SAFETY AND PUBLIC SAFETY, THOSE INDIVIDUALS WOULD AGREE JUST VISITING WITH THEM TO COMPLY WITH THOSE RULES.
AND WE HAVE SEVEN, IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID CURRENTLY? YES.
I MEAN, AND I WOULD, LIKE I SAID, I'D ANTICIPATE THAT THEY WOULD WANT TO FOLLOW YEAH.
BUT I WILL TELL YOU THAT SOME OF THEM ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED, SO WE WOULD NEED SOMETHING PRETTY QUICK.
'CAUSE WE'LL GET LOTS OF MONEY OUT THERE BUILDING IT.
AND MOST OF THESE SEVEN ARE IN PRECINCT ONE.
I, I GET A LOT OF COMPLIANCE ABOUT THE FENCING PART.
AND, AND THE FENCING PART WOULD BE SOMETHING EASILY TO DO RETROACTIVELY, EVEN IF THEY'RE BUILT.
[00:40:01]
YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S THE, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT DIFFERENT REGULATIONS WOULD BE DIFFICULT AS FAR AS CHANGING THE COMPLEXION OF WHAT THE DESIGN IS.THE, THE DESIGN'S NOT GONNA BE IMPACTED BY FENCE SE AND THE SEPARATION BETWEEN UNITS AND EVERYTHING.
YOU KNOW, THAT'S, HOW DO WE GO ABOUT IN, ON THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE OF THIS? LIKE WHERE'S THE, THE TEETH ON THE REPERCUSSIONS? SO I CAN ENFORCE TCQ RULES.
IT'S, IT, WE'LL, WE'LL WORK TOGETHER DEPENDING UPON WHAT THE, THE VIOLATION WOULD BE.
SOME OF THE, SOME OF THEM ARE COVERED UNDER OUR OFFICE AND SOME OF THEM WOULD BE COVERED UNDER HIS OFFICE AS WELL.
I HAVE A FEELING THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE CASE, BUT I WASN'T SURE.
SO, AND BOTH OF YOU CAN WRITE TICKETS FOR IF STUFF THEY DO? I CAN, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT HIS ABILITY.
DO WE DO, I THINK CONSTABLE ALSO HAS SOME AUTHORITY IN THIS MATTER, CORRECT? IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.
AND ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICERS AS WELL.
UH, 'CAUSE YOU WE'RE GONNA HAVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS. MM-HMM.
IF IT'S, IF IT'S AN ORDINANCE POSSIBLE, I HAVE TO GET WITH JOHN ON, ON WHO HAS CITATION AUTHORITY.
AND, AND BASED ON THE LAW, IT'S GONNA GIVE US A CLEAR DEFINITION AND PURE A CLEAR PATH ON HOW TO PROCEED.
IT COULD BE AN INJUNCTION AGAINST THEM AND IF THEY VIOLATE THE INJUNCTION, THEN CONTEMPT.
SO THERE'S MULTIPLE WAYS TO, TO PURSUE SOME OF THIS.
APPRECIATE Y'ALL GETTING THIS DONE ABOUT THE RV PARKS.
[6.E.2. Require Pipeline Information on the face of plats. ]
WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM TWO AND REQUIRE PIPELINE INFORMATION ON THE FACE OF PLATS.UM, ITEM TWO IS JUST, UH, IT'S, IT'S PRETTY SELF-EXPLANATORY.
JUST REQUIRING THAT ON THE FACE OF THE PLATTS, THE PIPELINE INFORMATION IS CLEARLY SHOWN AND, AND MARKED.
SO MAKING A MOTION, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
I'M SORRY, FURTHER DISCUSSION.
SO I'VE BEEN, I DON'T WANNA USE THE WORD PUSHBACK, BUT A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CULVERT SIZING.
SO ARE WE, SORRY, WE'RE NOT ON, THAT'S THAT'S THE THIRD ONE AND WE'RE ON THE SECOND ONE.
CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW WE JUST SEND INFORMATION OUT TO SOME OF THE PIPELINE COMPANIES AND SO THEY KIND OF HELP.
THEY HELP ME MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NO PIPELINES THAT WE'RE MISSING ON PLATS.
BUT IF WE COULD JUST GET THAT ADDED TO REQUIRE IT, THAT WOULD BE, THAT WOULD BE A GOOD HELP.
SO THE SURVEYORS WANNA SAY THAT THEY'VE NOT RESEARCHED AND THEY DON'T KNOW, BUT, BUT THOSE PIPELINES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED SO THAT THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ULTIMATELY BUYING THOSE LOTS KNOW THAT THERE'S PIPELINE NEXT DOOR, SIR.
OTHERWISE THEY MAY MIGHT NOT KNOW.
AND, AND LIKE I SAID, ONE OF IT'S BEEN REALLY GOOD ABOUT DOUBLE CHECKING THE PLATS WHEN THEY COME THROUGH AS PRELIMINARIES FOR ME JUST TO KIND OF HELP TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE COVERED.
BUT IF WE COULD ADD THAT, IT WOULD BE A GREAT HELP TO PUT THAT RESPONSIBILITY ON THE SURVEYORS
ANY, THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
[6.E.3. Culvert Sizing required on the face of plats. ]
CULVERT SIGNS WERE REQUIRED ON THE FACE OF PLANTS.SO THIS ONE CAME UP, UM, OUT OF A DESIRE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS NO ROOM FOR CONFUSION OR AMBIGUITY LATER ON IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
WHEN SOMEONE SITS DOWN AND DOES A DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE, HAVING THE CULVERT SIZING ON THE PLATT ITSELF WOULD BE VERY, VERY HELPFUL.
THAT WAY THERE'S ONE SINGLE SOURCE DOCUMENT THAT WE CAN ALL GO BACK AND LOOK AT TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY'S ON THE SAME PAGE AND THERE'S NO AMBIGUITY.
SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS WAS IS ARE WE GOING TO REQUIRE THE CULVERT SIZING GOING INTO THE PRECINCT ON THE SURFACE OF THE PLAT ALONG WITH ALL OF THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS? YES.
SO THAT'S WHERE I'M GETTING SOME ISSUES IS THEY SAID, YOU KNOW, ONCE THEY SELL A LOT, IT'S KIND OF UP TO THE BUILDER TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT CULVERT IS PUT IN CORRECTLY.
BUT THIS, SO THEY NEED TO PUT LANGUAGE IN THERE, THEN THEIR SALES CONTRACT OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT THEY DO THAT LETS THAT BUILDER KNOW THAT THEY'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR GETTING THE CORRECT SIZE PIPE IN THERE.
I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT WE INCLUDED YEAH, WE COLBERT'S FOR THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION IN THE LANGUAGE.
WE HAVE A LOT OF STRUGGLES, AT LEAST IN MY PRECINCT, WITH SUBDIVISIONS WHERE IT JUST WASN'T HANDLED IN A PRE-PLANNED WAY NECESSARILY.
AND SO GETTING THAT DONE ON THE FRONT END WHERE WE HAVE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY AND THERE'S NO ROOM TO SAY THEY DIDN'T KNOW OR WHATEVER IS THE PURPOSE BEHIND THIS LANGUAGE.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
[00:45:02]
THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN.WHEN ARE WE GONNA MAKE THAT EFFECTIVE? TODAY.
SO THAT ANY NEW PLATS THAT COME INTO YOU, RECORD SHOW FORWARD.
WE'VE HAD A BUNCH OF THOSE ISSUES IN OUR PRECINCT AS WELL.
[6.F. Authorize the salvage and sale of scrap metal, asset# 13832 boom mower in Precinct #3. (Commissioner Walden) ]
WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM FOUR.AUTHORIZES SALVAGE AND SALE OF SCRAP METAL.
SO BECAUSE THIS HAS AN ASSET NUMBER AND BECAUSE IT IS NOT USABLE, IT HAS TO GO THROUGH COURT HERE TO AUTHORIZE IT TO BECOME SALVAGE.
'CAUSE IT IS IN EFFECT ONLY WORTH SCRAP METAL.
MOTION BE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
[6.G. Authorization to apply for Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) grants with the TCEQ for replacement of precinct equipment. (Commissioner Hale) ]
TO ITEM G, AUTHORIZE AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN.TERP GRANTS WITH THE TCEQ FOR REPLACEMENT OF PRECINCT EQUIPMENT COMMISSIONER HALE, THIS IS JUST BASICALLY WE, WE HAVE THE INTENT TO, UH, FILE THE PAPERWORK FOR THIS PROGRAM, THIS GRANT PROGRAM, AND WE WANNA GO AHEAD AND GET, UH, COURT APPROVAL SO WE CAN FILE THAT PAPERWORK ONCE IT'S OPEN.
THE WAY I'M READING, THAT COULD APPLY TO ANY PRECINCT AS WELL.
SO IT'S NOT JUST SPECIFIC TO PRECINCT FOUR.
SO I WON'T HAVE TO DO THIS AT A LATER DATE, SIR.
SO I'LL MAKE THE MOTION, MOTION SECOND MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? I WOULD JUST MAKE THE COMMENT, UM, ANY SORT OF, THESE DO REQUIRE MATCHING FUNDS, SO ANY SORT OF MATCHING FUNDS WOULD BE THAT OF THE INDIVIDUAL PRECINCT THAT IS APPLYING FOR IT.
AND THEN, UM, IF THE GRANT IS AWARDED, THEN IT WOULD COME BACK TO COURT FOR THE ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF THAT DOCUMENT.
OH YEAH, WELL, WE HAVE, GO AHEAD.
WAITING FOR YOU TO CALL ME AFTER MR. PASS.
[6.H. Authorize the County Judge to sign the updated radio tower agreement with Crown Castle for the Agnes radio tower. (Sean Hughes / Judge Deen) ]
ADAM H AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY JUDGE TO SIGN THE UPDATED RADIO TOWER AGREEMENT WITH CROWN CASTLE FOR THE AGNES RADIO TOWER.UH, THESE NEXT THREE ITEMS ARE VERY SIMILAR, BUT THEY'RE, THEY'RE INDEPENDENT.
UM, THE FIRST ONE IS TO, UH, WE'VE WORKED WITH THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO UPDATE THE RADIO TOWER LEASE AGREEMENTS AS PART OF THE, UH, RADIO UPGRADE THAT WAS, UH, IS PART OF ARPA FUNDING.
UM, AND WE'RE ASKING THE COURT TO, UM, ALLOW THE JUDGE TO SIGN, UM, THE AGNES RADIO TOWER AGREEMENT.
UH, WHAT IT DOES IS IT, UH, DELINEATES WHAT PART OF THE TOWER WE'RE GOING TO USE AND WHAT SPACE IN THE SHELTER THAT WE'RE GOING TO USE.
AND, UH, THE INCREASED COSTS WERE ANTICIPATED AND, UH, ARE BUDGETED ITEMS. OKAY.
THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE GO? I GOT, DID WE GET ALL THE DAMAGE REPAIRED FROM THE LIGHT AND STRIKE A FEW MONTHS BACK? YES, SIR.
BOTH OF THOSE HAVE BEEN REPAIRED.
SO THE, WHAT'S THE INCREASE IN COST ON THIS ONE? DO YOU HAVE IT ON THE I I I DON'T HAVE IT EXACTLY.
UH, I THINK IT WAS, UM, I, I HONESTLY, COMMISSIONER, I, I DIDN'T BRING THAT INFORMATION WITH ME.
UH, BUT IT WAS WITHIN THE ACCEPTED AND BUDGETED FIGURES.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ARE ALL THE TOWERS GONNA HAVE AN INCREASE? WE'RE GONNA HAVE TWO MORE THAT WE'RE GOING TO BRING, UH, TO THE COURT ONCE THOSE ARE COMPLETED.
WE'RE STILL WAITING ON ONE ONE OF 'EM, UH, IS IN YOUR AREA STILL WORKING WITH A TOWER OWNER? UM, BUT, UM, YES, THERE'LL BE TWO MORE, UM, THAT ALLOW, IT'LL BE THIS ONE IN THE TOWER OFF OF UPPER DENTON, WHAT WE CALL THE MAIN TOWER.
UH, WE'RE ACTUALLY GETTING, HE WANTS TO DO SOME WORK UP THERE TO, TO, UH, UPDATE THAT SHELTER SHELTER'S, WHAT HOUSES, ALL THE RADIO EQUIPMENT.
SO, UH, WE SHOULD GET THAT PROBABLY IN LATE JANUARY, EARLY FEBRUARY.
SO REALLY, MY QUESTION IS, IS THIS, IS THIS INCREASE BEING PAID WITH ARPA MONEY? NO, SIR.
IT'S, IT'S, IT'S IN THE, THE, UH, IT'S A BUDGET LEASE IN, IN THE CONTRACT SERVICES IN GOT IT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HUH? SHE ASKED WHAT THE, UH, WHAT THE EXPECTED, UH, INCREASED DATE WILL BE.
WE'VE, WE'VE PUSHED MOST OF THESE BACK TO APRIL 1ST.
UM, THE ADDITIONAL, THE ADDITIONAL MONEY TO USE THOSE TOWERS, UM, STARTS WHEN WE ACTUALLY PUT EQUIPMENT IN AND GET IT HOOKED UP AND ADD IT TO THE TOWER.
SO MOST OF THESE ARE APRIL 1ST
[00:50:02]
END OF THE DISCUSSION.I DON'T SEE THE JACKSON TRAIL TOWER ON THERE OR ANY PROBLEMS WITH THAT.
MR. UH, OH, THE ALE TOWER? YES.
THAT'S ONE THAT WILL BE FORTHCOMING MAYBE.
[6.I. Authorize the County Judge to sign the updated radio tower agreement with American Tower for the Vanguard/Aledo 3 radio tower. (Sean Hughes / Judge Deen) ]
GO TO ITEM IOWA AND AUTHORIZE A COUNTY JUDGE TO, ON THE UPDATED RADIO TOWER, RADIO TOWER AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN TOWER FOR THE VANGUARD ALITO THREE RADIO TOWER.THIS IS THE TOWER THAT'S LOCATED, UH, IN WHAT MOST PEOPLE CONSIDER ALITO.
WE CALL IT THE VANGUARD TOWER.
UH, IT IS, UM, THAT'S ONE THAT'S ACTUALLY NOT CHANGING MUCH BECAUSE THE EXCHANGE OF EQUIPMENT, BUT, UH, NONETHELESS, UH, DOES REQUIRE US TO BRING AN UPDATED AGREEMENT BEFORE THE COURT.
ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? MOTION BE BY COMMISSIONER HILL WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.
FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
[6.J. Authorize the County Judge to sign the updated radio tower agreement with American Tower for the Cool radio tower. (Sean Hughes / Judge Deen) ]
WE'VE GOT, UM, JAY AUTHORIZED A COUNTY JUDGE TO SIGN THE UPDATED RADIO TOWER AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN TOWER WITH A COOL RADIO TOWER.THIS IS, UH, THE TOWER THAT'S LOCATED OFF OF 180, UH, MINERAL WELLS HIGHWAY.
UH, IT'S PROBABLY ONE OF THE NEWEST TOWERS THAT, UH, WE OPERATE OFF OF.
AND, UH, WE ARE ADDING SOME ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT TO THAT TOWER AND IT WILL BE COVERED UNDER BUDGETED FUNDS, UH, AND CONTRACT SERVICES.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? I, I WAS FOR MOTION.
I MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OF THE DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALL OF FAVOR PASS.
[6.K. Authorize County Judge to sign Permitium Vital Agreement upon review by the County Attorney. (Lila Deakle / Judge Deen) ]
GOOD.AUTHORIZED COUNTY JUDGE TO SIGN PERMITTED VITAL AGREEMENT UPON REVIEW BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY.
LALA, ARE YOU ABLE TO TAKE A PEEK AT THAT? I DO.
UH, WHAT THIS CONTRACT IS GONNA ALLOW MY OFFICE TO DO IS, UH, TO HELP SERVE PEOPLE THAT LIVE OUT OF STATE OR FAR AWAY, UM, TO GET THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATES.
UM, BUT THE THING I LIKE ABOUT IT THE MOST IS THIS COMPANY CAN VERIFY, UH, AN INDIVIDUAL'S IDENTITY BETTER THAN I CAN.
UM, IT'S GONNA BE NO PAUSE TO THE COUNTY.
UH, THE APPLICANT WILL PAY, UH, A SMALL FEE FOR THIS SERVICE.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS? ITEM? ALL IN FAVOR? PASS.
[6.L. Approve Bond for Stephen A. Decento, Deputy Constable, Precinct One. (Lila Deakle / Judge Deen)]
ITEM L, APPROVE BOND FOR STEVEN A DETO.OKAY, MOVE TO APPROVE THAT ITEM.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS BY BILL.
[6.M. Approve Bond for Lanny Lee Padgett, Deputy Constable, Precinct One. (Lila Deakle / Judge Deen) ]
M APPROVED BOND FROM PLANNING.DEPUTY CONSTABLE PRECINCT ONE.
YOU GOT ALL THE PAPERWORK MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY'S, TAKEN BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
[6.N. Approve the budget transfer of $124,044 from general fund program contingencie]
ITEM MAN.APPROVE THE BUDGET TRANSFER OF $124,044 FROM GENERAL FUND PROGRAM CONTENTIONS THROUGH THE INCREASE IN APPRAISAL AND COLLECTION SERVICES FOR 2024.
SO YOU ALL HAVE BEEN PROVIDED A LETTER THAT, UM, WAS SENT OUT BY THE PARKER COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.
UM, SO AS A RESULT OF SENATE BILL TO PROP FOUR, UM, IT INCREASED THAT HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR, UH, ISD TAXES.
AND SO, UH, AT THE END OF THE BUDGET PROCESS, THEY DID NOT HAVE THE FINAL, UM, BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE TAXING ENTITIES FOR THE, UM, FEES THAT WE PAY FOR APPRAISAL AND COLLECTIONS.
AND SO SINCE THE TAXABLE VALUE, UM, FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS DECREASED SIGNIFICANTLY, BASICALLY THOSE COSTS ARE REALLOCATED TO THE OTHER TAXING ENTITIES.
UM, AND SO FOR FISCAL YEAR 23, WE PAID 962,274.
UM, AND NOW THAT HAS BEEN INCREASED TO 1,127,112.
UM, SO I WAS PROVIDED A PRELIMINARY FIGURE, SO THAT NUMBER HAD BEEN INCREASED SOME FROM LAST YEAR, BUT NOT ENOUGH TO COVER THE, THE FULL INCREASE ONCE, UH, THE FINAL BUDGET WAS, UM, ALLOCATED.
SO THIS, UH, BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FROM CONTINGENCY IS TO COVER, UM, THE FEES THAT WE PAY FOR THE APPRAISAL
[00:55:01]
DISTRICT.SEEMS THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CALCULATE THAT BASED ON THE, UH, THE PASSAGE OF THE BILLS, RIGHT? IT SEEMS THAT TO ME.
I MEAN, I, I DID RIGHT BEFORE, UH, BUDGET ADOPTION ASK FOR, YOU KNOW, AN UPDATED NUMBER IF THERE WAS ONE, BECAUSE SOMETIMES WHEN WE'RE PROVIDED, UM, A FIGURE, IT'S A PRELIMINARY FIGURE AND THEN THEY ADOPT THE BUDGET.
AND SO I DID REACH OUT PRIOR TO AND, UM, I, I WAS GIVEN A NUMBER.
MOTION AVAILABLE MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN WITH THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS BEFORE WE GO? ALL IN FAVOR.
CAN I HAVE A FOLLOW UP QUESTION REAL QUICK, BRIANNA? SO THAT NUMBER THAT WAS GIVEN ON THE ESTIMATE AND NOW WE'RE, WE'RE HAVING TO PULL THIS ADDITIONAL AMOUNT, WHAT WAS THE, IS THIS 1,000,027? THE TOTAL INCREASE NUMBER? UM, SO FROM THE 9 63? NO, SO THE TOTAL FROM LAST YEAR TO THE FINAL NUMBER IS AN INCREASE OF 164,838, WHICH IS ABOUT A 17% INCREASE.
THAT'S WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR.
AND SO THE, THE AMOUNT THAT WE HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, TRANSFER IS THE 1 24, BUT THE TOTAL INCREASE IS ABOUT 165,000.
SO AS A, AS A RESULT OF THIS NEW REDUCTION ON THE SCHOOL TAXES, IT COST AN INCREASE COST TO THE COUNTY OF APPROXIMATELY 17 OR 17% MORE.
UM, ALL OF IT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN IF THEY HAD ANY OTHER, YOU KNOW, BUDGET INCREASES, BUT YES, THE SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THAT INCREASE IS PROBABLY RELATED.
I DON'T KNOW THE TOTAL INCREASE TO PCA'S OVERALL BUDGET AND WHAT THAT PERCENTAGE LOOKS LIKE, BUT YES, OUR PRO RATA SHARE WENT UP 17% 'CAUSE OF THAT'S SO, SO SOME OF THAT AGAIN MAY JUST BE A INCREASE, UM, YOU KNOW, FROM PCA'S BUDGET IN GENERAL.
BUT YES, I WOULD SAY PROBABLY THE SIGNIFICANT PORTION IS DUE TO, DUE TO THE REALLOCATION OF THAT.
UNLESS THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION PLEASE.
[6.O. Approve the budget transfer of $12,401 from general fund program contingencies to the 2023 Brazos Bash Grant. (John Forrest / Judge Deen)]
LET'S GO DOWN.OH, APPROVED THE BUDGET TRANSFER OF $12,401 FROM GENERAL FUND PROGRAM CONTINGENCIES TO THE 2023 BRAZOS BASH GRANT JOHN.
AND THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY WAS OBLIGATED BY THE COURT AS A PASS THROUGH TO THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD FOR THE PR, THE BRAS BASH AND SO WE'RE CURRENTLY FUNDING THAT.
WE GET REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE CITY ON THAT.
MOTION WILL MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE IN THE DISCUSSION PHASE.
SO THE REIMBURSEMENT MAY NOT TAKE PLACE, THEY SAID.
SO BASICALLY WE SEND IT TO THE COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE.
UM, ALL THE BACKUP WILL BE REQUESTED FROM THE BRAZOS, UM, BASH AND TO GO THROUGH ALL THE ELIGIBLE EXPENSES.
UM, AND SO IT'S PUT IN AN EVENTS TRUST FUND WITH THE STATE AND THEN ONCE THAT GRANT IS COMPLETED, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALL BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED, THEN WE WILL GET THAT FUNDING BACK.
BUT THEY DID SAY IT COULD TAKE ANYWHERE FROM SIX TO 12 MONTHS.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WADDLE AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
[6.P. Approve the local match requirement of $12,401 to establish the Brazos Bash Event Trust Fund and disperse payment to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. (John Forrest / Judge Deen)]
P, APPROVE THE TOTAL MATCH REQUIREMENT OF 12,401 TO ESTABLISH THE BRAS RIVER BRASH TRUST FUND AND DISPERSE PAYMENT TO THE TEXAS CONTROLLER PUBLIC ACCOUNTS.SO THE FIRST ONE IS TO DO THE ACTUAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT, ESTABLISHING THAT, AND THEN IT'S TO APPROVE THAT MATCHING.
UM, SO AS JOHN SAID, IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENT, HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED IN COURT THAT THERE WAS A CASH MATCH IN THERE.
AND SO, UM, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS APPROVED.
AND THEN WE WILL ALSO, UM, BECAUSE OF THE TIME, UM, RESTRICTIONS ON IT AND THAT IT NEEDS TO BE A WIRE TRANSFER.
UM, ONCE IF THIS IS APPROVED, THEN WE WILL ACTUALLY WIRE THOSE FUNDS OUTSIDE OF COURT AND THEN WE'LL PRESENT IT TO YOU AS A DIRECT PAYABLE.
CAN WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WALTER WITH THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE SEEN IN DISCUSSION? ALL FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WE GOT ITEM
[6.Q. Review and execute the Lease extension for the USDA Building at 604 North Main Street, and take any action the court deems necessary. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]
Q REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE LEASE EXTENSION FOR THE USDA BUILDING AT 6 0 4 NORTH MAIN STREET AND TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY.JOHN AND THIS A CONTINUATION LEASE.
THE QUESTION IS, IS IF WE'RE GONNA LEAVE THE AMOUNT STATIC THAT WE'VE HAD ON PREVIOUS YEAR'S LEASE ON THIS PROPERTY OR INCREASE, THAT WAS A QUESTION THAT THEY HAVE.
AND, AND RON, I, I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBER THAT THEY CURRENTLY HAVE THAT LEASE AT.
SO OUR ACCOUNTING SYSTEM GOES BACK TO LIKE 2008 AND I'VE SEEN IT'S BEEN THE SAME, SAME AMOUNT EVERY YEAR, WHICH IS 61,584.
[01:00:01]
WE KNOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? YOU KNOW, THE TION OFFICE, THE, DO YOU KNOW SQUARE FOOTAGE? THE USDA PORTION OF IT? DO YOU KNOW THE APPROXIMATE SIZE SQUARE FOOTAGE? IS IT ON THE AMENDMENT? SO IT APPEARS TO ME THAT WE'RE SITTING HERE WITH THE SAME NUMBER FOR SINCE WHEN 2008.
THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN INCREASE.
UH, I DON'T THINK ANYTHING ELSE IS, HAS BEEN THE SAME FOR THAT LONG.
AND, UH, I'M NOT SURE WHAT A FAIR AMOUNT WOULD BE, MR. HALE.
I THINK COMPS WOULD BE THE MOST PRECISE WAY TO LOOK AT IT.
SEE WHAT THE MARKET IS AT THE MOMENT.
OTHER THING IS THAT WE, WE, WELL WE'RE UH, WE'RE DEALING WITH THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND THEY, THEY PROVIDE A SERVICE TO THE, TO THE CITIZENS TAXPAYERS OF PARKER COUNTY BY BEING LOCATED IN PARKER COUNTY.
AND, UH, AT A TIME WHEN THEY'RE LOOKING AT, UH, CONSOLIDATING A LOT OF THOSE OFFICES, UH, WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THEY STAY HERE IN PARK COUNTY.
HOWEVER, I'M GONNA MOVE THAT WE, UH, INCREASE THAT, UH, AMOUNT OF THAT CONTRACT BY 5% ANNUALLY.
MOTION BE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN SECOND IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? WHAT'S THE LENGTH OF THE CONTRACT? IT'S ANNUAL.
WHEN, WHEN DOES THE CONTRACT RENEW? DECEMBER 31ST.
YEAH, SO WE DON'T HAVE TIME TO GET COMPS.
COMMISSIONER HALE, DO YOU HAVE EVEN A BALLPARK OF WHAT THAT RATE MIGHT BE? 64.
6 63 IS 5% ON THE 61 NUMBER ON THE CURRENT 61 5 84.
DO YOU HAVE A, I YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE TRYING TO BREAK IT DOWN TO A SQUARE FOOT, MOST OF THE RENT RATES ARE QUOTED THAT WAY.
SO WHAT'S THE, IF WE KNEW, I MEAN THE DIFFERENCE OF 2,500 FOOT TO 3000, WE'LL FAKE THAT NUMBER.
WE CAN COME BACK TO THIS ITEM.
SO WE HAVE EXACT NUMBERS IF Y'ALL LIKE TO DO THAT.
I'M GOOD WITH COMING BACK TO IT IF Y'ALL ARE.
OKAY, WE, WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND.
WE'RE GONNA COME BACK TO ITEM Q, UH, WITH A MOTION IN A SECOND.
DO YOU STILL WITHDRAW? ARE WE, WE STILL, NO, NO, HE'S NOT WITHDRAWN.
SO IT STARTED IN 2006 AND LET'S SEE, UM, 3,675, UM, NET USABLE SQUARE FEET.
I THINK COMMISSIONER HALE MAY BE DOING SOME CALCULATION OVER THERE.
SO THAT'S A 1675 A SQUARE FOOT RATE FROM 2006.
THIS, AT THAT POINT IT WAS, SO MAYBE IN THE FIRST COUPLE YEARS IT INCREASED 'CAUSE IT WAS, UH, 54,684.
THE FIRST YEAR WAS HOW MUCH? UH, 54,684.
SO, AND THEN WE HAD THAT BUMP APPROXIMATELY 7,000 MM-HMM.
SORRY, MY COMPUTER DOESN'T WANNA COOPERATE.
1488 SQUARE FOOT, THEN DO SOMETHING HERE.
[01:05:12]
SORRY, I CAN'T GET IT TO LOAD.GONNA GET BACK ON PEAK 18 SEVEN TIMES.
YOU KNOW, IF WE USED A, AN AVERAGE RATE OF INFLATION OF 3% BASED OFF OF THAT 54,684 AND OH SIX, I MEAN THAT DOLLAR AMOUNTS AT 93,000, YOU, YOU DIVIDE THAT BY 36 75, THAT'S $25 AND 33 CENTS A SQUARE FOOT, WHICH IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME IF THAT'S SOMEWHERE IN THE RANGE OF WHAT THE, WHAT AN APPRAISAL WOULD SHOW US.
BUT THERE'S A LOT OF CREDIBILITY TO WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT THE VALUE THEY BRING TO OUR COMMUNITY AND THE VALUE OF THEM BEING HAVING A BASE HERE.
AND I THINK THAT THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THIS.
SO MY OTHER CONSIDERATION IS THAT, OR MY OTHER COMMENT IS THAT NOBODY'S GONNA COMPLAIN ABOUT A 5% AT THIS POINT.
IF WE'LL CONTINUE THAT, WE'LL GET TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE, BUT, UH, A 25%, YOU KNOW, PROBABLY IS GOING TO MESS UP EVERYBODY'S, UH, IDEA OF WHAT IT SHOULD COST.
CHERYL, DO YOU HAVE A SECOND HERE? YES.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALL IN FAVOR.
[6.R. Review and Execute the First Addendum to the Interlocal Agreement with the Garner ISD for School Resource Officer Services. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]
R, REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE FIRST AMENDMENT ADDENDUM, I'M SORRY, TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE GARNER ISD FOR SE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SERVICES, JOHN.AND THIS IS AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SCHOOL TO PROVIDE FOR THE SERVICE OF A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER.
UH, WE HAVE MULTIPLE DS AND IT WOULD BE A CONTINUATION, BUT IT'S ESTABLISHING, UH, A RATE ON THAT PARTICULAR FOR GARNER GARNER.
IT'S BEEN EXECUTED? YEAH, IT'S BEEN EXECUTED BY THE SOM, THE SUPERINTENDENT.
AND SO THE BOTH HAVE FOR THE 2324, IT'S GONNA BE 14,487 AND IT HAS AN ESCALATION CLAUSE IN IT.
SO IT WILL GO UP TO 23,000 7 0 5.
THE THIRD YEAR, FOURTH YEAR WILL GO TO 3 2 9 24.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WAL WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS.
[6.S. Review and Execute the First Addendum to the Interlocal Agreement with the Peaster ISD for School Resource Officer Services. (John Forrest / Judge Deen)]
REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE FIRST ADDENDUM TO THE INTER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE PEACE OR ISD FOR SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SERVICES, JOHN.AND THIS IS A CONTRACT WITH STER.
THE AMOUNT FOR THAT FOR THE 2324 IS $21,071.
ESCALATES UP THREE YEAR THREE TO 31 6 0 7 CONTRACT YEAR FOUR 42,143 IN YEAR FIVE 50 2006 79.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
[6.T. Review and Execute the First Addendum to the Interlocal Agreement with the Brock ISD for School Resource Officer Services. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]
T, REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE PERSON THENUM TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE BROCK ISD FOR SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SERVICES.AND THIS A CONTRACT WITH BROCK ISD FOR SRO SERVICES, YEAR 2324.
YEAR THREE, IT'S GONNA ESCALATE TO 31,607 YEAR FOUR 42,143 AND YEAR FIVE 52,679.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
IS THERE ANY OF THE DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? JUST TO, JUST TO COMMENT ABOUT THESE.
THIS IS AN EFFORT BY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO, UH, COME FROM WHERE IT HAD BEEN TO WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE AND THAT THAT, UH, FIFTH YEAR IS, IS AT 50% OF THE COST OF THOSE OF THOSE OFFICERS.
SO, UM, ESSENTIALLY THE, THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE HAD BEEN PROVIDING THAT FOR NOTHING, BASICALLY.
A VERY SMALL AMOUNT AND IT, IT MOVES IT TO A 50 50 COST SHARE OVER FIVE YEARS.
UH, SO I APPRECIATE THE WORK FROM THE, THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO GET THAT.
[01:10:01]
DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.MOTION PASSED THIS FIVE OH, GO TO ITEM U, REVIEW
[6.U. Review and Execute the Interlocal Agreement for Inmate Housing with Young County. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]
AND EXECUTE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR INMATE HOUSING FOR YOUNG COUNTY.THIS CONTRACT IS TO HOUSE YOUNG COUNTY INMATES WHEN BEDS ARE AVAILABLE AT A COST OF 92 TH $92 AND 50 CENTS.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.
ANY DISCUSSION ON ITEM ALL THE PAPER MOTION PASSES BY VOTE, GO TO
[6.V. Approve the Resolution and Order for Condemnation for the acquisition of the McVoid Bridge Project and take any action the court deems necessary. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]
ITEM B, APPROVE THE RESOLUTION IN ORDER FOR CONDEMNATION FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE VOYD BRIDGE PROJECT AND TAKE ANY ACTION IN ACCORD DEEMS NECESSARY.JOHN, UH, THIS IS GONNA BE DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION UNDER C, SO WE'LL COME BACK AND TAKE ACTION AFTER DISCUSSING IT IN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION.
OKAY, WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN
[7. ACCEPT INTO THE MINUTES]
A ON ACCEPTING IN THE MINUTES UNDER ITEM A EXECUTED FY 23 AUDIT ENGAGEMENT LETTER WITH WEAVER AND TIDWELL, LLP.RECEIVE AND ACCEPT A CONTINUING EDUCATION CERTIFICATE REFLECTING SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION BY THE TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR OF 20 HOURS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION PURSUANT TO SB 5 46 AND SECTION 6.23 1D OF THE PROPERTY TAX CODE ITEM C EXECUTED AUTOMATED BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR WICHITA FALLS FORWARD FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS.
ITEM D, EXECUTED INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH WISE COUNTY FOR INMATE HOUSING.
ITEM E EXECUTED IWORKS AGREEMENT WITH PRECINCTS ONE THROUGH FOUR.
ITEM F, EXECUTED LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN FOR THE TEXNET SEISMIC.
LET THOSE BE RECORDED INTO ACCEPTED INTO THE MINUTES TEXAS
[8. EXECUTIVE SESSION]
TO ITEM EIGHT ON EXECUTIVE SESSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5 5 1 0 7, 1 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE RESERVING THE RIGHT TO MEET ENCLO SESSION AS NECESSARY TO ADDRESS ITEM A PENDING LITIGATION REGARDING TEXAS OPEN ASSESSMENTS AND TAKE ANY ACTION IN COURT DEEMS NECESSARY.ITEM B DISCUSSED, TAKE ACTION REGARDING BRUSH BURNING AT THE SOUTH SIDE CONVENIENCE CENTER AND ITEM Z, DISCUSS, TAKE ACTION.
THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY REGARDING THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE VOY BRIDGE PROJECT.
UH, LET'S ADJOURN TO THE, UH, WE'LL TAKE A SHORT RECESS AND ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 10 20 PROMPTLY.
OKAY, WE'RE GONNA, WE'RE WE'RE GONNA RETURN FROM, UH, EXECUTIVE SESSION, THE RECORD SHOW AT 1108 AND MOVE TO THE DISCUSSION IN EXECUTIVE SESSION UNDER ITEM A PENDING LITIGATION REGARDING TEXAS OPIOID SETTLE SETTLEMENTS AND TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY, DEEMS NECESSARY.
WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION UNDER ITEM B, DISCUSS TAKE ACTION REGARDING BRUSH BURNING AT THE SOUTH SIDE CONVENIENCE CENTER.
UH, WE AGAIN, WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION.
MOVE TO ITEM C, DISCUSS AND TAKE ANY ACTION OF THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY REGARDING THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE MC VOID BRIDGE PROJECT.
WHAT I'M GONNA MAKE A MOTION TO PROCEED WITH CONDEMNATION BASED ON KEITH KIDWELL NOT ACCEPTING FINAL OFFER FOR A DRAINAGE AND STORM WATER EASEMENT, INCLUDING THE EXHIBIT A, UH, STATEMENT AND PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION.
AND, UH, I WANT TO DO, I NEED TO READ OFF THIS, ALL THIS ACREAGE AND ALL THIS STUFF TO, TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S MARKED YES FOR BEING A 0.4059 ACRE 17.681 SQUARE FOOT TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE MEMPHIS EL PASO PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 28 44, PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF THAT CALLED 43.247 ACRE TRACK OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO KEITH, A KIDWELL AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 1735, PAGE 4 38, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORD WISE COUNTY TEXAS, O-P-R-W-C-T, SAID 0.4059 ACRE TRACT OF LAND.
IS THAT ENOUGH? THAT IS, THAT COVERS IT.
KEVIN, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE? IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE VOTE? MADAM CLERK, DID YOU GET ALL THAT? NO, BUT I'LL
[01:15:02]
MOTION PASSES.FIVE OH YOU ALL, I'M GONNA TAKE A PICTURE,
[9.A. PRECINCT 1 ]
MOVE TO ITEM NINE, A PLANTS ITEM UNDER ITEM A PRECINCT ONE UNDER ITEM ONE.I'LL LET YOU GET SETTLED THERE, BUT I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ IT OFF.
ITEM ONE UNDER PRECINCT ONE RELEASED THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
FIRST OF ALL, LET ME JUST SAY, IS THERE ANYBODY HERE THAT THAT'S HERE FOR A PARTICULAR ITEM THAT I CAN ADVANCE DOWN? UH, YES SIR.
UH, WE HAVE PEOPLE HERE FOR, UH, PRECINCT TWO, NUMBER FOUR.
AFTER I, I JUST READ THIS OFF SO WE'RE IN ONE, BUT I'LL GO TO THAT ONE NEXT.
UH, ITEM ONE, RELEASE THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR THOMAS LEN ESTATES AND ACCEPT A LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR PRECINCT ONE.
AND THIS NEW LETTER OF CREDIT IS GONNA BE IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,625 AND 92 CENTS.
AND WE'RE GONNA KEEP THIS IN PLACE UNTIL DECEMBER 20TH, 2025.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR RELEASING A LETTER OF CREDIT AND YES, EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER TO RELEASE THAT LETTER.
OKAY, MOTION IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WE'LL MOVE DOWN TO PRECINCT TWO.
UNDER ITEM FOUR, APPROVE THE FINAL REVISION FOR LIGO LINDA.
SECTION TWO CONSISTENT OF 32.704 ACRES DEVELOPED BY RAYMOND AND MARIE LARWOOD AND FRANK AND CYNTHIA SCHAFER LOCATED OFF OF LAKEVIEW COURT WITH WHITEWATER AND PRECINCT TWO.
THIS IS A RELA OF LOT 13 R AND 13 R ONE.
IT'S GONNA BE SPLIT INTO 13 AR FOR 26.465 ACRES AND 13 BR FOR 6.239 ACRES.
THEY DO HAVE, UH, ROAD FRONTAGE OFF OF LAKEVIEW COURT.
WE DID SEND OUT, UH, CERTIFIED LETTERS AND RAN ADS IN THE PAPER AS PER THE STATUTE.
OKAY, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1113.
IS THERE ANYBODY HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON UH, ITEM B FOUR PRECINCT TWO.
IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY TO THIS ITEM, THEY'RE ACTUALLY OKAY.
WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1113 AND GO TO THE ITEM COUNSELOR.
ALL DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO APPROVE THE FINAL REVISION.
PROPER NOTES WAS PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER.
LISTEN, THE DATE, TIME, LOCATION, AND PURPOSE OF TODAY'S HEARING, THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATING A ZERO BALANCE.
THE PERMITTING DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PRIVATE WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND ALL OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
PASS FIVE OH MOVE BACK TO UH, ON ITEM TWO, PRECINCT ONE, GRANTED EXTENSION FOR THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE OF SHADY CREEK ESTATES AND PRECINCT ONE AND, UH, THIS SIX MONTH EXTENSION WOULD GET THEM TO JUNE 3RD, 2024.
9 8 2 MOTION MAY BY COMMISSIONER CONY.
SECOND MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? COULD YOU JUST SHOW HER HOW YOU WANT THOSE IN THERE PAST FIVE? OH, WE'LL GO TO ITEM THREE, PRECINCT ONE.
WE BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR GREEN MEADOWS.
PHASE TWO CONSISTENT OF NINE ACRES DEVELOPED BY LORENZO AND XAVIER HERNANDEZ LOCATED OFF OF MANDERLY LANE WITH WALNUT CREEK SUD AND PRECINCT ONE.
IT'S GONNA BE A REPL OF A NINE ACRE TRACK.
IT'S GONNA HAVE TWO BOTS, UH, FIVE ACRE AND A FOUR ACRE, UH, ROAD FRONTAGES OFF OF MANDARIN LANE AND WE'D JUST LIKE TO GET PERMISSION TO BEGIN THE REVISION.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD TO BEGIN REVISION AND THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO BEGIN THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCESS.
MOVE TO APPROVE 9 83 MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL AGENDA OF THE DISCUSSION.
ALL IN FAVOR PASS BY OH WE GO.
ITEM FOUR, APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS EAGLE RIDGE ESTATE.
PHASE TWO CONSISTING OF 129.66 ACRES AVAILABLE BY 10 FLEET LOCATED OFF OF OLD SPRINGTOWN ROAD WITH EAGLE RIDGE MUD AND PRECINCT ONE.
THIS IS GONNA HAVE UH, 81 SINGLE FAMILY LOT TRACKS, UH, WITH FOUR HOA TYPE TRACKS THAT ARE GONNA BE USED
[01:20:01]
FOR UH, SANITARY EASEMENTS, GAS WELLS AND WELL EASEMENT.THEY ARE GONNA HAVE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY DONATED OFF OF OLD SPRINGTOWN ROAD.
ALONG WITH UH, A DECELERATION LANE FROM TXDOT.
THEY ARE GONNA BE PUTTING IN UM, STREETS TO BE KNOWN AS LAUREL LANE.
RAIN LILLY WAY, LANTANA DRIVE, TEXAS SAGE TRAIL AND BEBO BOULEVARD.
UH, THAT WILL BE COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADS AND UM, EAGLE RIDGE MUD IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.
COUNCIL EVERYTHING GOOD PRELIMINARY PURPOSES.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY WITH A SECOND, BUT COMMISSIONER HALE ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, PASS FIVE VOTE.
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLATT FOR SUBDIVISION.
BE KNOWN AS ESSAM RANCH CONSISTING OF 73.914 ACRES ABOVE BY TWO HM INVESTMENTS LOCATED OFF OF ESAM ROAD WITH WALNUT CREEK WATER, WALNUT CREEK SUD AND PRECINCT ONE.
THIS IS GONNA BE A 46 TRACK SUBDIVISION.
THE LOT SIZES RANGE IN SIZE FROM ONE ACRE TO 4.99 ACRES.
UH, THEY ARE PUTTING IN THREE COURTS KNOWN AS HERFORD DRIVE, CORTY COURT AND A ANGUS COURT.
UH, THEY ARE PUTTING UP A LETTER OF CREDIT.
THEY WILL ALSO BE DONATING UM, RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF HEREFORD DRIVE FOR ADDITIONAL UM, DEVELOPMENT.
AND UH, WALNUT CREEK SUD IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES? EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.
APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT PER SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS SYSTEM RANCH CONSISTENT OF 73 PER 0.914 ACRES DEVELOPED BY TWO HM INVESTMENTS LOCATED OFF OF SESAMES ROAD WITH WALNUT CREEK SUD IN PRECINCT ONE.
THIS IS THE UH, SAME INFORMATION WE JUST PRESENTED.
JUDGE COUNSEL EVERYTHING GOOD FOR FINAL.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATING OF BALANCE OF $40 AND 54 CENTS.
THE PERMITTING DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PUBLIC WATER THROUGH WALNUT CREEK AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND THEY HAVEN 'EM MET ALL THEIR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL.
ANY THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? WE GOT THREE PASS FIVE OH WE'LL GO TO ITEM SEVEN AND ACCEPT A LETTER CREDIT FOR SYSTEMS RANCH IN PRECINCT ONE.
WE DID RECEIVE UH, THREE BIDS.
THREE QUOTES FOR UH, DEVELOPMENT OF THESE ROADS AND UH, THE LETTER OF CREDIT IN PLACE IS UH, FOR $320,438.
WE'RE GONNA KEEP THAT IN PLACE UNTIL JANUARY OF 2025.
ALL THE PAPERWORK GOOD AND THE BID FOR 3/24/38 FROM DOBBS DOZIER SERVICE THERE WERE TWO OTHER BIDS.
ONE FOR 419,265 AND ANOTHER ONE FOR FROM CAD CONTRACTING FOR 459,221 25 CENTS.
NINE A SEVEN MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HA.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WILL MOVE TO ITEM MAY APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS PLEASANT OAK SUBDIVISION CONSIST OF 3.192 ACRES DEBUT BY MORELAND LIVING TRUST WITH DWELL WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.
AND THIS IS JUST GONNA BE A ONE TRACK SUBDIVISION.
ROAD FRONTAGE IS OFF OF KNOB ROAD.
UH, THEY DID DEDICATE 0.092 ACRES OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF KNOB ROAD AND WELL WATER IS GONNA BE THEIR COUNSELOR.
EVERYTHING GOOD FOR FINAL AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE.
IT HAS A BALANCE OF 1 0 8 AND 50 CENTS.
THE PERMITTING DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PRIVATE WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND THEY HAVE 'EM AT ALL.
OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS MOVE TO APPROVE NINE A EIGHT.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM NINE, ACCEPT A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED FOR PLEASANT OAK SUBDIVISION AND PRECINCT ONE AND UH, THIS WARRANTY DEED IS FOR 0.092 ACRES OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF GRO COUNSELOR PAPERWORK.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ANY THE DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH GO ITEM 10.
ACCEPT A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEEDED FOR MOLEY EDITION LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SPRINGTOWN
[01:25:01]
ETJ AT PRECINCT ONE.MRS. A PLATT THAT WAS PUSHED THROUGH THE CITY OF SPRINGTOWN BUT WE NOTICED THAT THEY NEEDED UH, TO DEDICATE 0.067 ACRES OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF HIGHLAND ROADS.
WE HAVE THAT EXECUTED PAPERWORK GOOD AND THE WARRANTY DEEDED IS IN ORDER.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER.
IS THERE ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM 11.
BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR A PEACH RANCH CONSISTING OF 4.2908 ACRES DEVELOPED BY ALVARADO RAMIREZ, LLC LOCATED OFF OF VILLE STATION ROAD WITH WALNUT CREEK WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.
CIS PLATT WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED WITH WELL WATER GOING IN SO THEY'VE COME BACK IN WITH AN AGREEMENT WITH WALNUT CREEK TO REDUCE THE TRACK SIZES.
SO THEY'RE TAKING UM, LOTS FIVE THROUGH 13, SPLITTING THEM INTO TWO AND EACH ONE IS A LITTLE OVER ONE ACRE IN SIZE.
SO WE JUST LIKE TO GET PERMISSION TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR REVISION THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
MOVED TO APPROVE NINE A 11 MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY WITH SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE, DO YOU ANY HAVE THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR MOVE TO ITEM 12.
BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR PEACH RANCH CONSISTS OF 21.2605 ACRES DEVELOPED BY THE ACHO CHILDREN'S TRUSTS LOCATED OFF OF BE SECTION ROAD OF WALNUT CREEK WATER AND SUPPLY AND PRECINCT ONE.
SORRY JUDGE, I MIXED THOSE TWO UP.
SO THE FIRST ONE THAT I TOLD YOU THE INFORMATION ON WAS ACTUALLY NUMBER 12 AND THIS, THE 4.29 ACRES WAS THE REPL OF LOT TWO AND THREE.
THEY'RE SPLITTING THOSE INTO TWO.
WE JUST LIKE TO GET PERMISSION TO AGAIN THE REVISION ON BOTH OF THOSE.
SO I DON'T KNOW IF I NEED TO, I DID THOSE BACKWARDS.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR REVISION OF 12? EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR THE REVISION ON ITEM 12 ON THE AGENDA.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLA PER SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS SUNSET VIEW.
OKAY, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION.
WE JUST NEED A MOTION FOR 11 NOW, RIGHT? I GET THIS.
UH, COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR REVISION OF 11 AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR THE ITEM NUMBER 11 UNDER PRECINCT ONE ON THE AGENDA MOVE TO APPROVE.
OKAY, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
DID WE NOT ALREADY APPROVE THIS ITEM? WE DID BUT SHE THE WRONG.
OKAY, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION.
BE KNOWN AS SUNSET VIEW CONSISTENT OF 10.09.
NINE ACRES DEVELOPED BY MICHAEL WILLIS LOCATED OFF OF OLD SPRINGTOWN ROAD WITH LOW WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.
IT'S GONNA BE A FOUR TRACK SUBDIVISION.
UH, THEY RANGE IN SIZE FROM TWO ACRES TO 2.317 ACRES.
THEIR ROAD FRONTAGE IS GONNA BE OFF OF OLD SPRINGTOWN ROAD AND THEY WILL BE DON DONATING THREE SEPARATE TRACKS OF LAND, UH, FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR PRELIMINARY? YES.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES.
OKAY, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL OF PAST FIVE OH WILL GO TO ITEM 14.
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLATT FOR SUBDIVISION.
BE KNOWN AS CARLTON ACRES CONSISTING OF 20.046 ACRES DEVELOPED BY NTH UNLIMITED LLC AND DOUGLAS AND JUDITH CORMIER LOCATED OFF OF SCOTT ROAD WITH LOW WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.
MS. GAMB BE A TWO TRACK SUBDIVISION.
EACH TRACK IS A LITTLE OVER 10 ACRES IN SIZE.
UH, THEY WILL HAVE WELL WATER WITH THEIR ROAD FURNISH COMING OFF OF SCOTT ROAD.
COUNSEL, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES? UH, YES EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR CARLTON ACRES FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? JUST A QUESTION.
IF IT'S OVER 10 ACRES, WHY IS IT HAVE TO BE PTED? OKAY.
ALL IN FAVOR PAST FIVE OH WILL BE ITEM 15, APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLA OF SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS MORRIS ESTATES CONSISTENT OF 18.840 ACRES DEVELOPED BY
[01:30:01]
PHILLIPS AND BRENDA MORRIS LOCATED OFF OF WENDY HILL LANE WITH WITH AQUA TEXAS WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.I'M SORRY, SHEET THIS REAL QUICK.
SO THIS IS GONNA BE UH, 13 LOTS BROKEN UP INTO THIS.
18 ACRES KNOWN AS MORRIS ESTATES.
UH, THEIR ROAD FRONTAGE IS GONNA BE OFF WINDY HILL LANE AND UH, AQUA TEXAS IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR MORRIS ESTATES FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES.
9 8 15 MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WILL GO ITEM 16, ACCEPT A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEEDED PER CESAM RANCH IN PRECINCT ONE AND THIS IS FOR 0.06 OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY UH, FOR THIS SUBDIVISION COUNSELOR.
ALL THE PAPERWORK GOOD AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEEDED ON SESSIONS RANCH.
I HAD TO REVIEW THAT MOVE TO APPROVE NINE A 16 MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WE'LL
[9.B. PRECINCT 2 ]
MOVE TO ITEM B PRECINCT TWO.BEGIN THE ROAD CHANGE TO POST NO THROUGH TRAFFIC TRUCK TRAFFIC SIGNS LOCATED ON ERWIN ROAD AND PRECINCT.
THE PRECINCT HAS REQUESTED UH, NO THROUGH TRUCK SIGNS TO BE POSTED.
SO WE'D JUST LIKE TO BEGIN THAT PROCESS TO GET THOSE SIGNS APPROVED.
COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD ON YOUR END AND WE ARE PROCESSING EVERYTHING LEGALLY TO PROCEED WITH THIS.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH WE GOT ITEM TWO, RELEASE THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR FEATHER EDGE ESTATES AND ACCEPT FEATHER LANE AS A COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAY IN PRECINCT TWO.
THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,553 AND 70 CENTS AND THE PRECINCT HAS APPROVED ITS RELEASE.
OKAY, THANK MOTION TO APPROVE.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
ITEM THREE, GRANTED EXTENSION OF LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE RESIGN TRAILS PHASE TWO AND PRECINCT TWO.
THIS EXTENSION WOULD PUT THEM UP AT JUNE 15TH, 2024.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS MEADOWVIEW ESTATE PHASE TWO CONSISTENT OF 6.79 ACRES DEVELOPED BY THE JUNE LLC LOCATED OFF OF ADVANCED ROAD WITH WELL WATER AND PRECINCT TWO.
THIS SUBDIVISION IS GONNA BE BROKEN UP INTO THREE LOTS.
THEY RANGE IN SIZE FROM 2.07 ACRES TO 2.58 ACRES.
THEY DO HAVE ROAD FURNITURE OFF OF ADV ADVANCE ROAD.
UH, WELL WATER IS THEIR WATER SOURCE.
WE DID BRING THIS TO COURT PREVIOUSLY AND I DID HAVE THEM CHANGE THAT.
COUNSEL, EVERYTHING GOOD ON YOUR END? THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATING ZERO BALANCE.
THE PERMITTING DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PRIVATE WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND THEY HAVE MET ALL THEIR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
OKAY, MOTION SHALL MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PAST FIVE.
ITEM SIX, APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLATT FOR SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS TIER ACRES.
CONSIST OF 10 ACRES DEVELOPED BY NTH UNLIMITED DELIA AND DOUGLAS AND JUDITH CORMIER LOCATED OFF OF SANDY LANE WITH WELL WATER AND PRECINCT TWO.
IT'S GONNA BE A FOUR TRACK SUBDIVISION.
THEY RANGE IN SIZE FROM 2.005 ACRES TO 3.9951 ACRES.
UH, THEY DO HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE OFF OF SANDY LANE.
THEY WILL HAVE AN EASEMENT TO GET TO.
UH, WELL WATER IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.
COUNCIL ARE WE GOOD TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAN.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALT.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY DISCUSSION BEFORE VOTE? HALL OF FAVOR.
[9.C. PRECINCT 3 ]
ITEM C ONE PRECINCT THREE.APPROVE THE FINAL REVISION FOR EAGLES BLUFF.
PHASE ONE CONSIST OF 4.019 ACRES DEVELOPED BY CHRISTIAN AND JEREMIAH PATTON LOCATED OFF OF EAGLES BLUFF DRIVE WITH WELL WATER AND PRECINCT THREE.
[01:35:01]
IT'S A COMBINATION OF LOTS 31 AND 32 FOR TURNING THIS INTO 31 R FOR 4.019 ACRES.THEY DO HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE OFF OF EAGLES BLUFF DRIVE WITH WELL WATER.
UH, WE DIDN'T SEND OUT CERTIFIED LETTERS DUE TO THE COMBINATION BUT DID RUN ADS IN THE PAPER AS PER THE STATUTE.
OKAY, UH, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1131.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM C ONE PRECINCT? THREE.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPENED AT 1131.
HEARING ITEM C NINE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1131 AND GO TO THE ITEM IS EVERYTHING IN PLACE PROPER NOTES WAS PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER LISTING THE DATE, TIME, LOCATION, AND PURPOSE OF TODAY'S HEARING.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATED IMBALANCE OF $2,583 AND 78 CENTS.
THE PERMITTING DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PRIVATE WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND THEY HAVE MET ALL OF THEIR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
OKAY, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WAL SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? NO WORRIES.
RELEASE THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR BLUE BON RIDGE.
AND ACCEPT ANNABELLE'S AVENUE WATTS WAY, STARBROOK LANE AND ELLA'S LANE.
IT'S COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAYS AND PRECINCT.
THE PRECINCT HAS APPROVED THE RELEASE OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,790 AND WE'D JUST LIKE TO GET, UH, THOSE ROADS ACCEPTED AS COUNTY MAINTAINED.
ROADWAYS MO MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR HOE BIN PHASE FOUR, SECTION TWO CONSISTENT OF 5.0020 ACRES.
DEVELOPED BY ROBBIE FELTON VICKI LAWSON LOCATED OFF OF LIVE PAN TRAIL AND HEARTHSTONE WATER AND PRECINCT THREE.
AND THIS, UH, REPL IS TAKING A LOT SIX INTO, DIVIDED IT INTO THREE LOTS, UH, TWO LOTS AT ONE ACRE AND ONE LOT AT 2.920 ACRES.
THEY EVOKE THAT THEY ALL HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE OFF OF YAN TRAIL WITH CAR STONE WATER AND WE JUST LIKE TO GET PERMISSION TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
WE HAVE THE PAPERWORK TO DO THAT AND ALL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
MOVE TO APPROVE NINE C3 AS PRESENTED TO COURT MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
WE'LL GO TO ITEM FOUR AND APPROVE THE FINAL PLA FOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS CLARK ESTATES.
CONSISTENT OF 3.157 ACRES DEVELOPED BY KENT SUE CAMBRO CLARK LOCATED OFF OF TAYLOR ROAD IN PARKER COUNTY.
THIS, UH, SUBDIVISION'S GONNA HAVE TWO LOTS.
LOT ONE HAS ONE ACRE AND LOT TWO HAS 1.825 ACRES.
THE ROAD BURNAGE IS OFF OF TAYLOR ROAD.
THEY ARE GONNA BE DONATING ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY AND PARKER COUNTY SUD IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.
THIS PAPERWORK IN PLACE AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATING A BALANCE OF $2,191 AND 18 CENTS.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PUBLIC WATER AND PARKER COUNTY SUD WOULD BE THAT PROVIDER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND ALL OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL ON PAPER PASS.
ITEM FIVE, ACCEPT THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEEDED PER CLARK ESTATES AND PRECINCT THREE.
THIS IS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 0.33.
ONE OF AN ACRE OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF TAYLOR ROAD.
WE HAVE THE PAPERWORK AND ALL THE PAPERWORK IS IN ORDER.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
I SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OF DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH.
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION.
DEVELOPED BY KEN KENNY, OZ WITH PARKER COUNTY, SUD AND PRECINCT THREE.
THIS SUBDIVISION IS GONNA HAVE 16 LOTS.
UH, THEIR ROAD FRONTAGES IS GONNA BE OFF OF BROCK HEIGHTS DRIVE AND TAYLOR ROAD AND THEIR WATER SOURCE IS GONNA BE COUNTY SIDE.
AND WE'D JUST LIKE TO DISCIPLINARY EVERYTHING IN PLACE FOR THE PRELIMINARY.
EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES.
WHO DO MOTION MADE? I'M SORRY.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.
BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR DRIFTWOOD RANCH ON THE BRAS CONSISTING OF 3.07.
THREE THREE ACRES DEVELOPED BY ROBERT AND ALICIA TIBBITS AND
[01:40:01]
SUBBURY MANAGEMENT AND LLC LOCATED OFF OF WEST MEADOW DRIVE IN PRECINCT THREE.IT'S GONNA BE A DIVISION OF LOT FOUR INTO TWO LOTS.
LOT FOUR R ONE IS GONNA HAVE 3.0773 ACRES AND FOUR R TWO IS GOING TO HAVE 1.475 ACRES.
WE HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE OFF OF WEST MEADOW DRIVE AND WE'D JUST LIKE TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
WE HAVE EVERYTHING FOR THE REVISION.
THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
MOVE TO APPROVE MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE OH.
BEGIN THE MEETS AND BOUNDS PROCESS FOR ELEVATION ESTATES.
CONSISTS OF 2.002 ACRES DEVELOPED BY RYAN AND AMANDA MOORE AND SAN KUDO LOCATED OFF OF SUNSET RIDGE DRIVE WITH ARCH UTILITIES AND PRECINCT THREE.
AND THIS REVISION IS JUST MOVING THE ORIGINAL LOT LINE ON A 10 AND 11.
UH, THE LOT SIZES ARE BOTH STAYING SAME WITH THE SAME ACREAGE OF 1.001 ACRES.
SO WE'D JUST LIKE TO GET PERMISSION TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.
THEY'RE, THEY'RE MOVING THE LOT LINE, BUT THE, THE SIZE OF THE ACREAGE IS GONNA STAY THE SAME.
THE SIZE IS STAYING THE SAME, BUT THE ORIGINAL LOT LINE WAS KIND OF AT AN ANGLE GOING UP TO THE NORTH AND NOW IT'S DOWN.
I I DON'T EVER RECALL HAVING THIS ISSUE BEFORE
AND, AND IT'S, UH, MEETS AND BOUNDS EXCEPTION.
AND SO WHAT IT IS, IT'S, IT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE SIZE OF EITHER LOT.
IT'S GONNA CHANGE THE DIMENSIONS ON WHERE THE, UH, MEETS AND BOUNDS SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE.
SO IT'S A NET LOSS FOR EITHER PROPERTY OWNER.
IT, IT IS WORDED KIND OF DIFFERENTLY.
SO IT SHOULD SAY INSTEAD OF 2.002 ACRES ON THE AGENDA SHOULD SAY EACH, EACH LANDOWNER HAVING 1.001.
'CAUSE THE TWO LOTS EQUAL TO 2.02.
WE HAVE THE PAPERWORK FOR THIS.
I MOVE TO APPROVE MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PASS FIVE.
OH, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
WE HAVE B TO TAKE NO ACTION ON B.
RIGHT? WHICH NUMBER IS THAT WAS PRECINCT FOUR.
DOESN'T HAVE NO B UP ON THE MAIN AGENDA.
I THOUGHT YOU SAID D NO, NO, I'M SORRY.
IT'S S IT'S UH, FOR THE RESOLUTION ORDER.
OH YEAH, FOR THE MCCOY BRIDGE.
WHICH PRECINCT? IT'S OUR PRECINCT.
IT'S A AGENDA ITEM UNDER SIX D.
WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION ON ITEM SIX B.
OKAY THEN I'M WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION.
OKAY, WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
THE RECORD SHOW THAT WE'LL ADJOURN AT 1139.