Dec 23, 2024 Commissioners Court

TO SALVAGE CELL AND SCRAP, DISPOSE, DESTROY SURPLUS TUB GRINDER AND, UH, DESKTOP COMPUTER.

AUTHORIZATION

[4.D.2. Authorization to salvage/sell as scrap/dispose/destroy surplus Tub Grinder & desktop computer. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

WERE ON ITEM D TWO.

SO REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO SALVAGE, SELL A SCRAP OR DISPOSE OF THE TUB GRINDER.

ASSET NUMBER 1 8 5 3 1 AFTER A TOTAL LOSS OF THIS CLAIM, UM, AND AUTHORIZATION FROM TAC TO DESTROY THIS ITEM, AND WE'RE ALSO REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO SALVAGE, DESTROY ADELE 70 20 DESKTOP.

COMPUTER ASSET NUMBER 2, 4 3 1 1.

ITEM THREE, AUTHORIZATION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY LIST AND ONLINE AUCTION.

MOTION IS MADE BY MR. WALDEN AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRY.

FIVE OH

[4.D.3. Authorization of Surplus Property List in an Online Auction. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

UH, WE ARE REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION OF THE ATTACHED SURPLUS PROPERTY LIST AND AN ONLINE AUCTION TO START.

JANUARY 3RD, 2025 AND GO THROUGH JANUARY 16TH, 2025.

WE WILL ADVERTISE, UM, THIS AUCTION AND THE WEATHERFORD DEMOCRAT ON DECEMBER 28TH AND JANUARY 4TH.

PICK UP FOR THE ONLINE AUCTION.

UM, SOLD ITEMS WILL BE JANUARY 17TH THROUGH JANUARY 31ST.

TO ITEM FOUR AND ACCEPT PROJECT RENEW PC 25 DASH OH TWO.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH.

MOVE

[4.D.4. Accept/Reject/Renew PC25-02 Aggregate Road Materials. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

AGGREGATE ROAD MATERIALS RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED FROM NON, UM, VENDORS ON PC 25 DASH ONE.

AGGREGATE ROAD MATERIALS FOR PARKER COUNTY, AND THE CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BEGIN JANUARY 15TH THROUGH JANUARY OF 2025 THROUGH JANUARY 14TH, 2026.

ADDITIONAL MATERIALS WERE OFFERED BY VARIOUS OF THESE VENDORS, AND IT'S BEEN PASSED TO ACTION OF THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO AWARD TO ALL RESPONDING BIDDERS AND TO ALLOW EACH COMMISSIONER TO USE ONE OR ALL AT THEIR DISCRETION BASED ON NEED AND LOCATION OF THE PRECINCT.

THE DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF PRICING AND UTILIZE THE VENDOR THAT IS THE BEST PRICE AND VALUE FOR THE COUNTY, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE.

RESPONSES RECEIVED INCLUDE ZACH BRIQUETTE, COMPANY P AND K, STONE KIN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, KIWI INFRASTRUCTURE, BIG CITY CRUSH, CONCRETE DFW MATERIALS, HEIDELBERG MATERIALS, AUSTIN ASPHALT SALES, AND BLADE GROUP.

LLC.

MOVE TO ITEM FIVE EXCEPT REJECT RENEW PC 25 DASH OH TWO PETROLEUM ASPHALTS RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED FROM FIVE VENDORS ON PC 25 DASH OH TWO FOR PETROLEUM ASPHALTS CONTRACT PERIOD WILL BEGIN FEBRUARY 1ST, 2025

MOTION IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR.

CARRIE.

FIVE OH.

[4.D.5. Accept/Reject/Renew PC25-02 Petroleum Asphalts. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

[00:05:01]

THROUGH JANUARY 31ST, 2026.

AGAIN, ADDITIONAL MATERIALS WERE OFFERED BY VARIOUS VENDORS.

PAST ACTION IS ALSO, UH, FROM THE COURT TO AWARD ALL RESPONDING VENDORS.

AND THOSE VENDORS INCLUDE ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS.

RIGHT.

ASPHALT PRODUCTS, CLEVELAND ASPHALTS, SUSTAINABLE PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES AND P SQUARED EMULSION PLANTS.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

ITEM SIX ON ACCEPT, REJECT, RENEW PC 25 DASH OH THREE.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE FIVE OH.

MOVE TO

[4.D.6. Accept/Reject/Renew PC25-03 Transportation of Human Remains. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

TRANSPORTATION OF HUMAN REMAINS.

TWO RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED FOR PC 25 DASH OH THREE.

TRANSPORTATION OF HUMAN REMAINS FROM FORT WORTH FUNERAL AND CREMATIONS AND TRIPOD CONCEPTS.

ON OMNIA PC 25 DASH OH SIX.

MOTION CARRIES FIVE OH.

MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN

[4.D.7. OMNIA PC25-06 Used Backhoe B&G. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

USED BACKHOE, B AND G REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE, UH, OMNIA PC 25 DASH OH SIX.

THIS IS A USED BACKHOE FOR BUILDING A GROUNDS FROM HOLT CAT THROUGH OMNIA CO-OP CONTRACT 2 1 8, I'M SORRY, 2 1 2 8 1 16 DASH OH ONE.

AND WE'RE ALSO REQUESTING THAT THE COURT AUTHORIZE THE AUDITOR TO DO AN OVERRIDE FOR THE PURCHASE WHEN THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IS RECEIVED FROM BUILDING AND GROUNDS TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM DEPARTMENT FIVE 10 TO DEPARTMENT FIVE 13.

DOWN TO ITEM EIGHT D ON THE CONSIDERATION, APPROVAL AND APPOINTMENT OF NANCY FAUST, TARA BRUS AND LAURA SMITH FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE PARKER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL ON PAPER.

MOTION CARRIES BY VOTE.

WE'RE GONNA MOVE

[8.D. Consider/Approve appointments of Nancy Foust, Tyra Branz, and Laurie Smith for membership to the Parker County Historical Commission. (Bill Warren / Judge Deen) ]

BILL, MR. WARREN, IF YOU WOULD COME UP.

GOOD MORNING, JUDGE.

AND, UH, COMMISSIONERS.

UH, MERRY CHRISTMAS.

WHO ARE YOU ALL? UH, I AM, UH, BILL WARREN WITH THE PARKER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION, AND I AM HERE TO REQUEST, UH, AUTHORIZATION AND APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKER COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY, AS YOU SAID, UH, FER, NANCY FAUST, UH, TYRA BRUNS AND, UH, LORI CHANCE SMITH.

UH, ALL OF THESE FOLKS BRING SOME BACKGROUND.

I'M, I GUESS YOU SAW IT IN YOUR PACKAGE.

SOME BACKGROUND IN EITHER ARCHITECTURE, UH, HISTORY DESIGNATION, THOSE OF YOU ALL WHO HAVE EVER READ THE, THE, UH, AROUND DEAL STATION KNOW THAT LORI CHANCE SMITH IS DEEPLY, DEEPLY INVOLVED, UH, IN, IN NORTHEAST PARKER COUNTY, AS IS NANCY FAUST, BY THE WAY.

UH, AND SHE IS HERE, UH, HERE.

I I UNDERSTAND SHE'S A FAMILIAR FACE IN THIS COURTROOM.

UH, .

UH, SO, UH, UH, SHE AGAIN, UH, WAS WITH THE SILVER CREEK, UH, HERITAGE SOCIETY.

THAT'S THE TUCKER HOUSE.

IF YOU'RE NOT AWARE OF THAT, IT'S A BEAUTIFUL PLACE.

DID YOU EVER I KNOW, YEAH.

COMMISSIONER CONLEY HAS BEEN OUT THERE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.

UH, AND SO, UH, WE ARE REQUESTING, UH, AUTHORIZATION FOR THEM TO BE, UH, MEMBERS OF THE PARKER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION.

MOTION VOTE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.

CARRIE BY BILL.

WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM EIGHT E ON APPROVED DOCUSIGN CONTRACT FOR USES BY MAGISTRATES AND SIGNING DWI, BLOOD TEST SEARCH WARRANTS.

THANK YOU, BILL.

[8.E. Approve Docusign contract for use by magistrates in signing DWI blood test search warrants. (Jeff Swain / Judge Deen) ]

JEFF, IF YOU WOULD COME ON UP.

THANK YOU FOR HEARING FROM ME TODAY.

UM, SO AS, AS JOHN CERTAINLY KNOWS ON DWI CASES, ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT TOOLS THAT WE HAVE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IS THE USE OF A BLOOD TEST, UH, GIVES THE JURORS AND THE JUDGES AN OPPORTUNITY TO ACTUALLY SEE THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF WHAT THE PERSON'S BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION IS.

UM, OBVIOUSLY THAT CAN BE USED FOR, UH, A DEFENDANT OR AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, UM, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE RESULTS ARE.

SO, UH, THIS PROGRAM HAS BEEN IN EFFECT FOR PROBABLY AROUND 20 SOME ODD YEARS.

I THINK WE INCLUDED MISDEMEANORS IN IT 10 TO 15 YEARS AGO.

IT STARTED OUT JUST AS FELONIES.

UM, AND AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE KIND OF A HODGEPODGE OF PROGRAMS. A LOT OF OUR JUDGES ARE ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY GETTING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT AND GOING TO THE HOSPITAL TO MEET WITH THE OFFICERS THAT HAVE A DWI SUSPECT IN CUSTODY.

SOME OF THEM ARE USING A LEADERS PROGRAM.

THE OFFICERS DON'T LIKE THE LEADERS PROGRAM, SO THAT'S NOT A GOOD SOLUTION BECAUSE IT TAKES THEM A LOT OF TIME TO UTILIZE.

UM, SOME OF THEM ARE USING AN EMAIL SYSTEM THAT'S ALSO KIND OF HODGEPODGE AND, AND CREATES A NUMBER OF PROBLEMS. UM, SO PROBABLY ALL OF Y'ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH DOCUSIGN.

YOU PROBABLY SIGNED NUMEROUS DOCUMENTS ON IT OVER THE YEARS.

UH, AND SO WE HAVE A PROGRAM WE'RE TRYING TO ROLL OUT USING DOCUSIGN TO HAVE THE JUDGES SIGN THE WARRANTS VIA DOCUSIGN.

OFFICERS CAN USE IT AS WELL.

SO IT ALL SHOULD BE WITHIN THE ONE SYSTEM.

[00:10:01]

AND, UH, THE PRICE FOR THAT FOR THE FIRST YEAR IS $2,564 AND 64 CENTS.

UM, THE SECOND YEAR, THERE'S A, UH, AN UPFRONT COST OF 3 72 64 THAT'LL ROLL OFF OF THERE.

SO IT'LL BE JUST UNDER $2,200, UH, THE SECOND YEAR.

ASSUMING IT WORKS OUT, IF IT DOESN'T WORK OUT, WE WON'T KEEP IT GOING, BUT WE WANT TO SEE IF THIS IS A SOLUTION TO HELP OUR JUDGES MAYBE GET A LITTLE BIT MORE SLEEP AND MAKE THESE DWI SEARCH WARRANTS GO A LITTLE QUICKER.

SO I WOULD ASK THE COURT TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT WITH DOCUSIGN.

HOW WOULD THIS COUNSELOR, YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO THAT OR, I, I JUST GONNA MAKE SURE KIM HAD SET THEM UP AS A VENDOR, UH, FROM DOCUSIGN.

THEY PROBABLY HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE OFF FOR CHRISTMAS JUST LIKE WE DO.

SURE.

SO, KIM, CAN WE, UH, HAVE THE JUDGE EXECUTE THAT CONTINGENT UPON THE OWN BEING SET UP AS A VENDOR? YES.

YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON THAT.

ONE THING I FORGOT TO MENTION IS HOW ARE WE PAYING FOR THAT? WHICH I KNOW IS PROBABLY ALWAYS THE QUESTION THE COURT SHOULD ASK.

AND ALWAYS ONE I SHOULD ADDRESS.

UM, I HAVE SOME ROOM IN MY CONTRACT SERVICES BUDGET THAT WE CAN PAY FOR IT.

UH, I WAS GONNA SUGGEST JAMES COULD PAY FOR IT.

JUST PUT IT UNDER IT.

GOOD.

SO I'M GONNA, I'M GONNA JUDGE, I'M GONNA MOVE THAT WE APPROVE, UH, DOCUSIGN, THE DOCUSIGN CONTRACT, UH, CONTINUING UPON THEM BECOMING A VENDOR FOR THE COUNTY.

OKAY, WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO A ITEM EIGHT A ON APPROVAL OF PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR JLG EQUIPMENT SERVICES INCORPORATED.

MOTION MOVE BY.

SURE.

COMMISSIONER WALDEN A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL I FAVOR CURIOUS.

[8.A. Approval of a property tax abatement for JLG Equipment Services Inc. (Chris Strayer / Judge Deen) ]

CHRIS, IF YOU WOULD COME UP, UH, GOOD MORNING.

UH, SO THIS IS THE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT, UH, FOR THE JLG EQUIPMENT SERVICES INC.

UH, PROJECT, UH, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT.

UH, AT THE LAST, IN THE MEETING IN NOVEMBER, WE APPROVED THE REINVESTMENT ZONE FOR THIS PROJECT, UH, IN COMMISSIONER CONLEY'S, UH, PRECINCT.

AND SO THIS IS JUST COMING BACK TO DO THE ACTUAL ABATEMENT ITSELF.

AND SO THIS PROJECT, UH, IS A $5 MILLION PROJECT NEW BUILD, UH, AND WE'LL EMPLOY, UH, 2020 PEOPLE, UH, BASED UPON THE, UH, INCENTIVE POLICY THAT WE HAVE, UH, THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR A 35% FOR TWO YEAR, UH, PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR THAT PROJECT.

MOTION MADE, EXCUSE ME, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL OF EVERETT CURIOUS FIVE OH,

[8.B. Public Hearing for creation of the reinvestment zone 2024-03. (Chris Strayer / Judge Deen) ]

UH, ITEM B PUBLIC HEARING PER CREATION OF THE REINVESTMENT ZONE 20 24 0 3, CHRIS? CORRECT.

AND SO THIS IS, UH, ANOTHER PROJECT THAT IS IN, UH, COMMISSIONER HALE'S DISTRICT, UH, OR PRECINCT.

AND SO THIS, UH, AGAIN, IS JUST SETTING UP THE REINVESTMENT ZONE.

WE'LL COME BACK, UH, IN A MONTH'S TIME, UH, TO DO THE ACTUAL ABATEMENT FOR THE PROJECT, BUT THIS IS FOR A DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT, 188 ACRES.

SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR A, UH, REINVESTMENT ZONE, UH, AROUND THAT PARCEL TO SUPPORT THE ABATEMENT IN THE FUTURE.

I DO HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, BUT THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'M GONNA OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING AT NINE 15.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM EIGHT B ON THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CREATION OF THE REINVESTMENT ZONE? 20 24 0 3 RECORDS SHOW THAT THAT IS THE PUBLIC HEARING'S OPEN AT NINE 15 HERE.

NINE C NINE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT NINE 16 AND GO TO THE ITEM.

WE DO HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE, UH, FOR APPROVAL, AND WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLLEEN ON PRECINCT ONE.

UH, FOR A SECOND.

OKAY, WE'RE GONNA MOVE BACK TO ITEM FIVE A ON DISCUSSION.

MOTION CARRIES FIVE.

OH, THANK YOU, CHRIS.

[5.A. Discuss/Take action on ongoing reporting of bond projects to Commissioners Court by Freese & Nichols. (Chris Bosco / Commissioner Holt) ]

TAKE ACTION ON ONGOING REPORTING OF BOND PROJECTS TO COMMISSIONER'S COURT BY PRESIDENT NICHOLS.

CHRIS, I SAW YOU SLIP IN HERE.

UH, IN COORDINATION WITH, UH, COG.

UH, CHRIS VASCO FREEZE THE NICHOLS.

UH, SO THIS IS THE ALWAYS KINDA HESITATES THERE.

UH, THIS IS THE MONTHLY UPDATE.

UH, IT WAS REALLY INCLUSIVE OF, UH, NOVEMBER, UH, UP TO THIS DATE.

AND, UM, A FEW UPDATES.

OF COURSE, YOU'VE SEEN THE, THE TIP MOD HAS, HAS BEEN PENDING HERE, BUT THAT, UH, AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR, THAT SHOULD BE APPROVED FOR OLD WEATHERFORD ROAD.

UH, THAT'S,

[00:15:01]

UH, WE'VE HAD SOME, UH, RECENT, UH, STAKEHOLDER COORDINATION MEETINGS.

UH, BANKHEAD HIGHWAY, UH, MET WITH SOME OF THE LANDOWNERS ADJACENT TO THAT ROAD, AS WELL AS THE CITY OF WILLOW PARK.

UH, WE JUST MET, UH, WITH THE HALF TEAM, UH, WITH SOME, UH, PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO THE SEVEN 30 EXTENSION.

UH, KIND OF INITIATE SOME OF THAT, UH, COORDINATION.

UH, THE JUDGE AND I GAVE AN UPDATE TO, UH, THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD, UH, COUNCIL LAST WEEK, UH, JUST ON THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTS WITHIN, UH, THE CITY LIMITS OF WEATHERFORD.

UH, ALSO, ALSO, I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU, CHRIS.

UH, YOU MIGHT MAKE NOTE ALSO JUST TO KEEP THE COMMISSIONERS, UH, APP OPPRESSED TO WHEN WE DO THAT AND KIND OF GO ON A ROAD SHOW AND WE ARE IN THEIR PRECINCTS TO MAKE SURE THEY UNDERSTAND AND KNOW AND GIVE 'EM TIME TO BE THERE AS WELL.

OKAY? YES.

OF WAY ACQUISITION, UH, PRECINCT THREE, UM, THE, SO RICK WILLIAMSON WERE FINALIZED THE DESIGN ON THAT.

UM, AND THEN THE LAST ITEM ON MY HEAD HERE IS THAT C TIFF FUNDING.

UH, JUST WANTED TO KIND OF PUT ON NOTE THAT THE, THE FINAL REIMBURSEMENT IS MARCH 24TH.

UH, SO WE HAVE SOME TIME.

UM, WE RECENTLY, UH, UPDATED THE PROJECT IN PRECINCT TWO TO, UM, UH, THE, UH, ZION LOOP THAT WAS BID WITH ELLIS CREEK.

SO, UH, THAT ONE, UH, THE PAPERWORK'S BEEN COMPLETED WITH TECH STOCK AND, AND WE WILL GET REIMBURSEMENT FOR THAT WORK AS PART OF THAT PROJECT.

AND THEN WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT ON KELLY ROAD, UH, IN, UH, PRECINCT FOUR.

UH, SO PRECINCT UPDATES, THIS IS, UH, KIND OF THE OVERALL MAP THAT I'VE SHOWN IN THE PAST.

AND THEN I'LL GO INTO KIND OF A LITTLE MORE DETAIL IN EACH ONE.

UM, STARTING WITH PRECINCT ONE, UH, THE MAIN HIGHLIGHTS HERE IS, UH, SO MIDWAY ROAD AND J AND WOODY, UH, WE'RE READY TO ADVERTISE THOSE PROJECTS.

WE'RE TRYING TO GET IT HERE IN, IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, BUT WE KIND OF GOT INTO THE HOLIDAYS HERE, SO JUST RIGHT AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR, UH, WE'LL GET THOSE ADVERTISED.

UH, SO THOSE WILL BE THE FIRST, UH, UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN IN PRECINCT ONE.

UH, AND THEN, UH, LATER ON THIS WEEK, WE'RE ACTUALLY MEETING WITH A PROPERTY OWNER THAT, UH, COMMISSIONER COLLEY'S BEEN TALKING TO AT THE REALIGNMENT OF DEAL STATION N 51.

UH, THE SIGNAL PLANS WERE DELIVERED TO TECH STOCK.

THEY'LL, THEY'LL BE BIDDING OR BUILDING THE SIGNAL AT STEWART STREET.

UH, AS, AS PART OF THAT ARRANGEMENT, THE COUNTY WAS, WAS, UH, THERE WAS ONLY DELIVERING THE PLANS ON THAT PROJECT.

UM, THIS KIND OF SHOWS YOU A HIGHLIGHT OF WHERE WE ARE ON THE SCHEDULE.

SO YOU'LL SEE KIND OF, UH, AT THE COMPLETION OF DESIGN ON MIDWAY AND J AND WOODY, UH, CHURCH ROAD, WE'RE AT 90% DESIGN.

UH, WE'VE GOTTEN THE RIGHT OF WAY DOCUMENTS DONE, AND, UH, NOW DOING THE APPRAISAL WORK, UH, ON, ON THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT.

SO, SO WE CAN GET, UH, CHURCH ROAD OUT TO BID AS WELL.

UM, THE, UH, PRECINCT TWO HIGHLIGHTS.

UH, SO OAK RIDGE, WE'RE AT 90% DESIGNED.

SAME THING.

THE RIGHTAWAY DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE, AND WE'RE DOING THE MARKET STUDY, UH, FOR THE RIGHTAWAY ACQUISITION, UH, THAT'S NEEDED FOR THAT PROJECT.

AND THEN WE HAVE A, UH, PUBLIC MEETING PLAN FOR JANUARY 8TH, UH, TO KIND OF COMMUNICATE, UH, THE PROJECT TO THE CITIZENS IN THAT AREA.

UH, JOHNSON BEND AND GREEN ACRES, UH, THE PLANS ARE FINALIZED AND THE ASBESTOS, UH, WORK IS UNDERWAY.

UH, AND SO WE'RE LOOKING TO GET THAT ADVERTISED IN JANUARY.

UM, AND REALLY THE ASBESTOS WORK ALONG WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD WILL, WILL HAPPEN CONCURRENTLY.

UH, AND THEN OF COURSE, ELLIS CREEK IS UNDERWAY.

I MENTIONED THE C TIFF FUNDING IS FOR A, A PIECE OF THAT PROJECT.

UH, THAT'S ONE OF THE RECENT UPDATES THERE.

UH, THE SEVEN 30, SO HALF IS, UH, UNDER CONTRACT AND HAS BEGUN THE DATA COLLECTION, UH, WORK FOR THAT PROJECT.

AND THEN WE HAD THE, THE STAKEHOLDER COORDINATION MEETING LAST WEEK, UH, THAT I MENTIONED A MOMENT AGO.

UH, OF COURSE 51 AND CARTER ROAD.

UH, THE LAST UPDATE WE TALKED ABOUT, UH, THE AFAS IN PLACE AND WE'RE WORKING ON THE DESIGN.

UH, AND THEN WE HAD A COORDINATION MEETING WITH THE POJO ROAD EXTENSION FOR ONE OF THE OWNERS THAT OWNS PROPERTY ON, ON THAT, UH, PROJECT.

UH, SO THIS KIND OF SHOWS YOU A UPDATE, UH, SNAPSHOT OF THE SCHEDULES.

UH, THE FIRST, YOU KNOW, UM, JOHNSON BEND AND GREEN ACRES WOULD BE THE, THE NEXT JOB TO BID.

AND THEN SHORTLY AFTER THAT WOULD BE, UH, THE OAK RIDGE, UH, PROJECT.

ONE OF THE NICE THINGS ABOUT OAK RIDGE IS WE, ALTHOUGH WE NEED RIGHT OF WAY THE RIGHT OF WAY'S, NOT REALLY GONNA PRECLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION FROM PROCEEDING.

IT'S KIND OF CORNER CLIP, UH, RIGHT

[00:20:01]

UH, WE'RE JUST KIND OF WORKING THROUGH, UH, THE FINAL APPROVALS FROM T AT THE INTERSECTIONS.

AND THEN, UH, CITY OF WEATHERFORD IS THAT SEGMENT'S IN WEATHERFORD NOW.

UH, SO THE PLAN IS MID TO LATE JANUARY TO ADVERTISE, AND THAT'LL BE THE FIRST LARGE, UH, PROJECT THAT WE BID AS PART OF THE BOND PROGRAM.

UH, AND THEN, UH, UH, WE MENTIONED, UH, I 20 RAMPS ARE UNDER REVIEW BY TECH STOCK.

AND THEN, UH, AT THE MOMENT, TECH STOCK'S PLANNING TO DO THE SCHEMATIC WORK ON I 20.

UH, SO AT THE MOMENT THERE'S NOT ANY PROGRESS FROM THE COUNTY, UH, BUT WE'RE STILL KIND OF COORDINATING WITH TXDOT ON THAT.

THAT WOULD BE FOR THE FRONTAGE ROADS, UH, SEGMENTS THAT WERE PART OF THE BOND.

WE'LL MOVE IN THERE.

UM, IN PRECINCT FOUR, UH, I MENTIONED ABOUT SOME OF THE COORDINATION EFFORTS.

UH, SO WE COMPLETED ALL THE SEW WORK THERE AND HAVE BEEN, UH, MEETING WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND, UH, THE CITY OF WILLOW PARK, THEY'RE PLANNING A, A SEWER LINE ALONG THE ROUTE.

UH, SO THE INTENT IS TO BUNDLE THAT SEWER LINE WITH THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION.

UH, SO WE'VE ALSO COMPLETED, UH, THE, THE, UH, SURVEY RIGHT OF WAY DOCUMENTS THERE AND, UH, AND THEN ARE GOING TO DO THE APPRAISALS ON, ON THAT PROJECT, UH, ON OLD WEATHERFORD ROAD.

THEY'VE DONE THE RIGHT OF WAY CLEARING AND GRADING WORK, AND INDICATED THAT THEY'LL GET THE DETOUR IN PLACE RIGHT AFTER THE HOLIDAYS.

UH, SO THAT WILL, ONCE THAT DETOUR IS IN PLACE, THEN THE MORE OF THE CONCRETE WORK AND THE DRAINAGE WORK WILL BEGIN.

UH, AND THEN SAME THING, ONG PERKINS, THEY'RE DOING THE DATA COLLECTION FOR THE, UH, FM 1187 WIDENING PROJECT.

UH, AND THEN WE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING ON THE DESIGN FOR THE SOUTH SEGMENT OF KELLY ROAD, UH, BETWEEN BEAR CREEK AND 3 77.

AND THIS KIND OF SHOWS YOU A SUMMARY.

AND OF COURSE, THE, THE MAJOR BID JOB THERE IS THE BANK HEAD.

UH, SO WE'RE PRETTY FAR ALONG DESIGN.

AND THEN, UM, THAT ONE DOES HAVE SOME CRITICAL RIGHT OF WAY PIECES.

UH, SO ONCE WE GET THOSE, WE'LL BE ABLE TO ADVERTISE THAT PROJECT.

UH, AND THEN HERE'S THE WEBSITE FOR THOSE, UH, WATCHING.

WE WILL POST THIS ON THE WEBSITE FOR YOU TO DOWNLOAD, UH, AND, AND LOOK IN MORE DETAIL.

SO ANY QUESTIONS, IT'S IMPRESSIVE THAT EVERY TWO WEEKS THAT YOU, THERE'S CONTINUATION OF PROGRESSION.

AND JUST AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR THAT.

THAT'S VERY GOOD.

UM, SO IF YOU WOULD, UH, ANY QUESTIONS FOR CHRIS BEFORE WE MOVE ON? JUST A COMMENT, JUDGE, YOU SENT ME A TEXT THIS MORNING REGARDING THE, UH, RAILROAD CROSSING AT ONE 13 AND MILLSAP.

SO FM ONE 13, WELL, I WANT YOU TO DISCUSS THAT BECAUSE THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE ONLY LIVING BECAUSE THEY, THEY'RE WAITING ON THAT TO BE COMPLETED.

AND IT'S, IT'S, THIS IS FROM THE, UH, WHICH BOND PRO PROGRAM 2016.

GOT IT.

NOW, THANK YOU.

UH, YEAH, SO WE HAD A MEETING WITH TECH DOC IN THE RAILROAD, UM, ON FRIDAY, TRY TO FINALIZE A DIFFERENCE IN COMMENTS THERE, UH, COMPLETED THAT.

I THINK THE RAILROAD'S SATISFIED NOW.

AND, UH, TEXA HAS SET THE BID DATE FOR, UH, SEPTEMBER 4TH.

UH, SO WE ARE HOPING THAT WOULD BE IN THE SUMMER, AND THAT THEY SET THAT TO ALLOW FOR THAT RAILROAD AND TECH STOCK AGREEMENT TO GET PUT IN PLACE.

BUT I, I THINK THE THING WE'RE HAPPY ABOUT IS THAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE A DATE.

WE HAVEN'T HAD A BID DATE, UH, SO THAT, THAT'S, UH, KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT ON THAT JOB.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED WORK ON THAT PROJECT.

UH, AND JUST TO BE FAIR, UH, HE, HE'S DONE HIS VERY BEST.

HE'S NOT THE HOLDUP, BUT HE'S DONE EVERYTHING HE HAS BEEN ASKED TO DO EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

SO THANK YOU.

UH, CHRIS, UH, ANYTHING ELSE YOU HAVE ON THAT? UH, NOPE, I THINK.

UM, WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION ON THAT AND, UH, WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO AUTOMATE FIVE ON THE, ARE YOU READY FOR THAT? ON THE RFQ FOR THE PC 24 39 WATER STUDY THAT'S RECENT NICHOLS, HOLD ON.

OKAY, WELL HOLD ON.

ITEM EIGHT I ON THE REAPPOINTMENT OF ESD ONE COMMISSIONERS, MARK, JACK, BEN OVERHOLT AND SEAN SCOTT.

WE, WE, WE'RE GONNA GO TO BEAR WITH ME HERE.

[8.I. Reappointment of ESD 1 Commissioners Mark Jack, Ben Overholt, and Shawn Scott. (Commissioner Conley) ]

UM, MR. SCOTT, MR. SCOTT, DO YOU WANT TO TALK OR THE OTHER TWO GUYS AREN'T HERE? WELL, I HOPE BACK THERE.

A TEAM TO, TO BENEFIT, YOU KNOW, ALL OF PARKER COUNTY AS BEST WE CAN.

I JUST WOULD LIKE TO SAY, YOU KNOW, SERVING ON THE ESD ONE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HAS BEEN A GREAT HONOR AND I THINK WE'VE MADE SOME GREAT PROGRESS AND WE CONTINUE TO WORK TOGETHER AS

[00:25:01]

SO, UM, I GRACIOUSLY ASK FOR YOUR REAPPOINTMENT AND, UH, CONTINUE TO SERVE THE, THE COUNTY AS BEST I CAN.

WE APPRECIATE WHAT Y'ALL DO, MR. .

VERY MUCH SO.

BEN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP AND SAY ANYTHING OR ARE YOU, YOU GOOD? OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CON LEE, UH, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? CAN WE MAKE THIS SUBJECT TO MR. OVERHOLT PASSING THE BACKGROUND CHECK? SURE.

WHATEVER YOU NEED.

ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIES FIVE VOTE.

THANK YOU, BEN SCOTT AND THE REST OF THE BOARD.

SIX A ON THE DISCUSSION UPDATE ON THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MEETING.

UH, WE'LL MOVE BACK TO ON ITEM.

SHE'S GOT HER LAPTOP IN HER HAND UNDER ITEM

[6.A. Discussion/Update on Regional Transportation Meeting. (Judge Deen) ]

YOU DO HAVE A HANDOUT FROM THAT MEETING, UH, AS WELL AS THE, UH, ATTENDANCE OF YOUR REPRESENTATIVE.

UM, CYNTHIA, JUST BASICALLY JUST, THEY'VE GOT THIS AHEAD OF TIME, SO IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, JUST, JUST A QUICK OVERVIEW ON SOME OF THE HIGH POINTS.

AND THEN JUST IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS.

I THINK HE SAID KEEP IT SHORT.

TWO MINUTES SHORT.

GOOD MORNING.

DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I I DID EMAIL YOU ALL THE, UM, ALL OF YOU THE PRESENTATION ON FRIDAY.

UM, AND BASICALLY, UH, THIS IS A, UM, THREE MONTH, UM, UPDATE.

THERE WAS NO MEETING IN NOVEMBER.

UM, SO THIS IS OCTOBER AND DECEMBER.

AND, UH, THE THREE THINGS THAT REALLY, UH, CAUGHT, UH, MY, UM, EYE THAT WOULD BENEFIT PARKER COUNTY ARE TWO OF THE GRANTS.

UM, ONE IS FOR THE, UH, REDUCED DIESEL EMISSIONS, AND THE OTHER ONE IS THE, UM, TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADES THAT PARKER COUNTY WOULD QUALIFY FOR.

SO IF YOU DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THOSE TWO, LET ME KNOW.

UM, JUST FYI, GOING BACK TO THE DIESEL EMISSIONS, UM, I HAVE SENT A LIST OF, UH, VEHICLES TO THEM, UM, AND THEY WILL SEND ME BACK, UM, A LIST OF THE ONES THAT QUALIFY FOR THAT PROGRAM.

SO I'M HOPING THAT I, WE GET A GOOD AMOUNT OF THOSE THAT QUALIFY FOR PARKER COUNTY.

UM, AND THEN, UM, JUST SOME GOOD INFORMATION THAT WAS SHARED DURING THE RTC THIS LAST TIME.

UM, JUST THE GROWTH THAT IS COMING UP, UM, WITHIN HOUSEHOLD POPULATION AND WITHIN EMPLOYMENT.

IT'S JUST REALLY EYE-OPENING TO REALLY SEE THE NUMBERS DOWN FOR US.

IF YOU, AND THAT'S PRETTY ALL I HAD, UM, FOR YOU GUYS.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.

I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO GIVE YOU MORE DETAILED ANSWERS.

THANK YOU, CYNTHIA, VERY MUCH.

UH, WE'RE GONNA MOVE DOWN TO ITEM 10 ON EXECUTIVE SESSION.

UM, GIVEN OUR AUDIENCE HERE, UM, WE'RE GONNA JUMP AHEAD JUST A LITTLE BIT AND IF YOU WOULD INDULGE US,

[10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: ]

IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5 5 1 0 7 1 0 7 2, THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SERVING THE RIGHT TO MEET AND CLOSE SESSION, UH, UNDER ITEM A, UH, AN EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION MEETING WILL BE HELD PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 5 5 1 0 7 1 2 AND OH 1 2 9 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE CONSULTATION WITH THE ATTORNEY FOR THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO CONSULT WITH AND SEEK ADVICE FROM THE ATTORNEYS REGARDING A TO ACTIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, PARKER COUNTY COMMISSIONER PENDING OR COMPLETED LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO TEXAS COUNTIES.

AND ANY OTHER MATTER DESCRIBED IN THE MEETING'S AGENDA, UH, WE CAN GET TO BE, WE'LL GET TO BE ON THAT AS WELL.

UNDER UPDATE ON THE PARKER COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER ON THE REAL ESTATE PORTION OF THAT, THE RECORD SHOW THAT WE WILL MOVE TO, UH, EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 9 31.

WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO OUT MAY ON THE EXECUTIVES, UH, SESSION MEETING THAT PURSUANT TO 5 5 1 0 7 1 AND 1 2 9 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE IN CONSULTATION WITH THE ATTORNEYS AND COMPLETING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS IN THE COUNTY AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO TEXAS COUNTIES AND ANY OTHER MATTER DESCRIBED IN THE MEETING AGENDA.

WE'RE GONNA TAKE NO ACTION ON THAT.

WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM B ON THE UPDATE DISCUSSION.

PARKER COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, WE'RE GONNA TAKE NO ACTION ON THAT.

[8.F. Discuss/Approve paid OT for dispatch to cover shortages. (Sheriff Authier / Judge Deen) ]

WE'RE GONNA GO BACK TO ITEM EIGHT F ON THE DISCUSSION.

APPROVED THE PAID OVERTIME PER DISPATCH TO COVER SHORTAGES.

SHERIFF PAPIER,

[00:30:10]

HI CHIEF WAS GONNA TALK ABOUT THIS, BUT YEAH, WE'VE HAD, UH, SEVERAL DISPATCHERS, UH, LEAVE RECENTLY AND GIVE NOTICE.

SO, UH, WE'RE PRETTY SHORTHANDED IN THERE AND WE'RE GONNA NEED SOME, UH, MONEY TO, UH, PAY 'EM OVERTIME TO GET THOSE SHIFTS FILLED.

AND THE MONEY, WE KNOW THAT IN THE SALARY LINES, I'M SURE THERE'S USUALLY AN ABUNDANCE.

YEAH, TYPICALLY IN THIS CASE BECAUSE THEY'RE SHORTHANDED.

SO THEIR SALARY LINES SHOULD OFFSET THE INCREASE.

'CAUSE WE DON'T BUDGET FOR THE OVERTIME.

THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO GET CLARIFICATION FROM COURT ON IS THIS WOULD BE LIKE SOMEONE WOULD HAVE TO WORK 40 HOURS A WEEK, AND THEN WHAT TYPICALLY WOULD BE EARNED IN COMP TIME WOULD BE THEN PAID OUT IN OVERTIME IF THIS IS APPROVED.

SO AN EXAMPLE, IF SOMEONE WORKS 30 HOURS, BUT THEY'RE ON VACATION FOR 10 HOURS, YOU KNOW, TO EARN COMP TIME, YOU PHYSICALLY HAVE TO WORK OVER 40 HOURS.

AND I JUST WANNA MAKE THAT CLEAR THAT IF SOMEONE TAKES TIME OFF, THEN THAT WOULD TAKE AWAY FROM PAY THAT THEY WOULD GET IN OVERTIME UNLESS THE COURT DEEMS DIFFERENTLY.

IN FACT, WE WOULD REQUEST IT DIFFERENTLY IF POSSIBLE.

WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THOSE SHIFTS ARE FILLED AND IF SOMEBODY DID TAKE OFF AND THEY DIDN'T WANT TO COME BACK TO FILL A SHIFT BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T, WOULDN'T GET PAID FOR IT, THEN UH, WE WOULDN'T WANT THAT.

SO IF WE COULD JUST PAY THE SHIFTS AS NEEDED, UH, IT WOULD REALLY HELP US OUT TILL WE GET BACK TO FULL STAFF.

DO WE HAVE A ESTIMATE ON AMOUNT, LENGTH OF TIME, ET CETERA? UH, CHIEF MAY KNOW A LITTLE BIT BETTER ON THAT.

I UNDERSTAND.

I'M ASKING YOU TO GUESS IN THE FUTURE, BUT CAN YOU GIVE US SOME GUIDANCE ON THAT? SO WE'RE SHORT, UM, WE LOST FOUR, FOUR DISPATCHERS THIS MONTH.

WE ALREADY HAD ONE OPENING.

UM, WE HIRED THREE NOW TO, TO REPLACE SOME OF THOSE LOSSES, BUT IT TAKES, ON AVERAGE, ABOUT TWO MONTHS TO TRAIN UP A DISPATCHER BEFORE THEY'RE READY FOR RELEASE.

SO WE'RE LOOKING AT LEAST, YOU KNOW, TWO OR THREE MONTHS IN THE FUTURE.

OBVIOUSLY WE TRY TO USE THIS AS SPARINGLY AS POSSIBLE, BUT THE, THE FACT OF THE MATTER REMAINS, I HAD THREE DISPATCHERS ALMOST THE ENTIRE SHIFT, CALLING SIX SATURDAY, WHICH LEFT ME WITH ONE DISPATCHER AVAILABLE TO COVER AN EVENING SHIFT.

UM, AND SO TRYING, HERE'S THE OTHER THING.

I MEAN, IT'S NOT LIKE WE HAVE AN UNLIMITED POOL OF DISPATCHERS TO CHOOSE FROM.

WE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO PULL FROM DISPATCHERS WHO, YOU KNOW, DIDN'T WORK THAT DAY OR MAYBE OFF OR MAYBE ON VACATION OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, OR WORK A DOUBLE SHIFT COVER IT, OR FOUR HOURS HERE, FOUR HOURS THERE.

SO TRYING TO PIECE THOSE, THOSE THAT COVERAGE TOGETHER'S, IT'S PRETTY DIFFICULT.

ESPECIALLY, DID I, SORRY TO INTERRUPT, BUT DID I HEAR YOU CORRECTLY THAT SATURDAY WE HAD ONE DISPATCHER? NO, AND WE NORMALLY WOULD'VE HAD FOUR.

WE, WE NORMALLY HAVE FOUR ON EVENING SHIFT.

WE HAD THREE CALL IN SICK, SO WE HAD TO SCRAMBLE TO COVER THAT SHIFT.

THE SHIFT WAS COVERED, BUT WE UTILIZED, UH, UH, OFFERED PAID OVERTIME FOR THAT.

AND SO ONE OF THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS WITH, UM, I MEAN, IT'S GREAT GETTING TIME, BUT NOBODY WANTS TO COME IN ON THEIR DAY OFF AND COVER A SHIFT JUST TO GET THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME THAT THEY WOULD NORMALLY BE OFF AND SPEND WITH THEIR FAMILY.

SO IN ORDER FOR US TO ENTICE AND INDUCE OUR EMPLOYEES TO COME IN AND ACTUALLY COVER THESE SHIFTS, WE, WE WANT TO OFFER THIS OVERTIME REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY'VE, THEY'VE CALLED IN DURING THAT 40 HOUR PAY PERIOD OR THEY'VE TAKEN A VACATION DAY.

UM, I UNDERSTAND THE, UM, THE SAVINGS OF, YOU KNOW, COVERING WITH COMP TIME AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

BUT AS FAR AS WE HAVE 19 DISPATCHERS, AND SO TO GET ONE OF THOSE 19 TO COME IN ON THEIR DAY OFF OR STAY OVER AND WORK LATE, IT WOULD BE AN INDUCEMENT FOR US TO BE ABLE TO OFFER THAT THAT PAID OVERTIME, UM, IN LIEU OF COMP TIME TO COVER WHATEVER SHORTAGE THEY MAY HAVE DURING THAT, UH, THAT 40 HOUR.

SITUATION, IT'S NOT COMMON FOR THIS TO HAPPEN.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HA AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, UH, IN THE DISCUSSION PHASE.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ANY OTHER COMMENTS? W DOES THIS MOTION APPROVE IT FOR THE REST OF THE FISCAL? WHAT'S THE MOTION, I GUESS IS WHAT I'M ASKING TO APPROVE THE OVERTIME? YEAH.

TO, TO, MY MOTION WAS TO APPROVE THE OVERTIME OPTION FOR THE DISPATCH TO COVER DURING THE SHORTAGES IN THIS TIME, WHICH YOU, YOU MENTIONED, YOU MENTIONED FOUR MONTHS.

I MEAN, I WOULDN'T, I, I DON'T WANT TO HOLD YOU TO THAT.

IT COULD TAKE A LITTLE BIT LONGER THAN THAT, THEN WE'D HAVE TO COME BACK.

UH, UNFORTUNATELY WE DON'T KNOW.

WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN, YOU KNOW, SO IT WOULD, TO, TO YOUR QUESTION, I WOULD SAY FOR THE REST OF THE YEAR, AND WE CAN GET THROUGH THIS

[00:35:01]

UH, BUT WE NEED TO SET OURSELVES TO WHERE WE DON'T HAVE TO BRING THIS BACK AGAIN AND DO IT AGAIN.

WE OBVIOUSLY UNDERSTAND YOUR SITUATION, THE DISPATCH SITUATION IS, OR THE POSITIONS ARE VERY STRENUOUS.

UM, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU'RE DOING EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO DO THAT.

I WOULD SAY IT WOULD, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, COMMISSIONER HOLT, I WOULD SAY IT WOULD BE FOR THE WHOLE YEAR IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.

AND HOPEFULLY IT DOESN'T COME TO THAT, BUT IT, I'M GUESSING THE HESITANCY IS TO IS THAT THAT WOULD POSSIBLY BE ABUSED.

AND THAT'S, SO THAT'S, UH, AND WE NEED ASSURANCE THAT THAT'S, I I WILL GIVE YOU MY ASSURANCE.

IT WILL NOT YEAH, I, I'M JUST SAYING THAT THAT'S, AND UH, THEN, YOU KNOW, THEN WE GET INTO THE, WELL, UH, YOU DO IT FOR THIS DEPARTMENT, WHY DON'T YOU DO IT IN MY DEPARTMENT? I SEE YOU HEAD SHAKING BECAUSE I CAN SEE, UH, UH, THE WAY THINGS WORK.

WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THIS IS A SPECIFIC INCIDENT THAT HAS OCCURRED THAT WOULD REQUIRE THIS AND IT, IT MOST LIKELY WOULD NOT BE APPROVED ANYWHERE ELSE.

IS THAT FAIR TO SAY THAT WE, WE, UH, 'CAUSE I CAN, I CAN HEAR THE FOLKS BACK AT PRECINCT THREE NOW THE WHEEL'S TURNING DOWN THERE AND, UH, SO I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS IS FOR A, UH, A, A PARTICULAR, UH, JOB DESCRIPTION, NOT FOR THE WHOLE COUNTY FOR A 24 HOUR COMMUNICATION.

EXACTLY.

9 1 1 7.

CURIOUS BY VOTE.

MOVE TO ITEM G ON ACCEPT DONATION OF $500 FROM THE PARKER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FROM RIF RANCH, LLC.

[8.G. Accept donation of $500.00 to the Parker County Sheriffs Office from Rife Ranch, LLC. (Mark Arnett / Judge Deen) ]

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

THEN DISCUSSION.

ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH

[8.H. Receive and accept the continuing education certificate reflecting successful completion by the Tax Assessor-Collector of 20 hours of continuing education pursuant to SB 546 and Section 6.231(d) of the Property Tax Code. (Jenny Gentry / Judge Deen) ]

ITEM H.

RECEIVE AND ACCEPT THE CONTINUING EDUCATION CER CERTIFICATE REFLECTING SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION BY THE TEXAS ASSESSOR COLLECTOR OF 20 HOURS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION PURSUANT TO SB 5 46 AND SECTION 6, 2 3 1D OF THE PROPERTY TAX CODE.

UH, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

I WILL MOVE TO J ON APPROVAL OF THE 2025.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE? FIVE.

OH, WE'VE DONE,

[8.J. Approval of 2025 stop loss policy and vendor. (Becky McCullough / Judge Deen) ]

THAT'S, WE'RE TAKING NO ACTION ON THAT.

SORRY.

WE'LL

[8.K. County Judge to draw names for 2025 Sick Leave Pool Committee. (Becky McCullough / Judge Deen) ]

GO TO ITEM K ON COUNTY JUDGE TO DRAW NAMES FOR 20 25 6 POOL COMMITTEE.

I HAVEN'T PUT IT IN A CHRISTMAS BAG 'CAUSE I KNOW THIS IS Y'ALL'S FAVORITE THING TO DO.

THAT DOESN'T QUITE FIT.

IS THERE ANY UNBIASED PERSON WE COULD GET TO DRAW? BECAUSE THE COUNTY JUDGE, HE'S A HEY, ARE YOU A, HE COULD BE ONE OF THE CAN CAN WE MAKE A RULE THAT IF YOU'VE ALREADY SERVED ON IT TWO YEARS IN A ROW, I TAKE A GREAT OFFENSE TO THIS.

YEAH, NO, WE WOULDN'T HAVE EVEN DONE THAT LAST COURT.

UM, HEY, I'M ALL FOR THAT THOUGH, COMMISSIONER.

COURT REPRESENTATIVE ON COURT.

I'LL JUST TELL YOU.

YOU, I DON'T WANNA BLAME YOU.

WE COULD HAVE MR. HEISER DO IT.

I MEAN, YEAH, YOU KNOW, GET IT OUT HERE.

LET'S GO.

RICHARD, HURRY UP IS ALL I GOTTA SAY RICHARD.

RICHARD WOULD BE GOOD AT THAT.

OH YEAH.

YOUR HEAD'S SHAKING YOUR COME OUT.

WHAT'S IT FOR? WHAT, WHAT ARE WE DRAWN FOR? STATE COURT COMMISSIONER.

GEORGE CONLEY.

YOU JINXED ME.

FIRST TIME SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE.

I THINK GEORGE HAS BEEN ON THERE.

HE CAME BY THE OFFICE.

YOU HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE? I KNOW MY TIME WAS COMING.

ALRIGHT.

THIS IS ELECTED OFFICIAL.

I JUST HAVE ONE.

ODDS ARE MUCH LOWER ON THIS ONE THOUGH.

KELLY GREEN.

ANOTHER EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT CHOICE.

GOOD JOB, JUDGE.

HE PROBABLY DOESN'T THINK SO.

OUR SAFE NOW I NEED THREE EMPLOYEES FOR THESE TWO YEAR TERM.

YEAH, COULD BE.

SO I'LL DRAW THREE NAMES OUTTA THIS ONE AT A TIME.

THE FIRST JANICE MILLER, THE, UH, COMMISSIONER COURT BILL.

THERE'S ONE YEAR, YEAR TO YEAR, IS THAT RIGHT? NO, IT'S FOUR YEARS.

ABIGAIL.

ABIGAIL PLAY.

FOUR YEARS, JUST LIKE THE TERM, REGULAR TERM.

[00:40:02]

IS THAT ONE.

TERRY STOUT.

IT'S HARD TO JUST GET ONE DOESN'T SHOW UP.

THAT'S A MATTER OF, OKAY.

UM, IT DOES NEED TO BE A, UM, THE WAY IT'S WORDED MOTION IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? CARRIE FIVE OH, MOVE

[8.L. Discuss/Approve the County Judge to sign Motorola proposal. (James Caywood / Judge Deen) ]

TO IDA MEL.

CONGRATULATIONS GEORGE.

YEAH, YOU'RE HONOR, I'M HAPPY FOR YOU IDA.

GLAD I CAN HELP IDA.

MEL AND DISCUSS, APPROVE THE COUNTY JUDGES HAS SIGNED THE MOTOROLA PROPOSAL.

UH, JAMES, UH, JUDGE COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL BALDWIN, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD AND RADIO PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE, UH, MEMBER.

UM, I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE STATEWIDE EMERGENCY RADIO INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT.

UH, WE'VE WORKED WITH, UH, WORKED THROUGH ALL THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS.

UH, THIS IS THE LAST STEP IN THE PROCESS TO, UH, GET THE MOTOROLA PROPOSAL APPROVED.

UM, WE'RE ADDING TWO MICROWAVE CONNECTIONS, UH, ONE ON THE NORTH END OF THE COUNTY AND ONE HERE IN THE CENTRAL EAST END OF THE COUNTY TO CONNECT TO FORT WORTH.

UM, ALL THESE, ALL THE TOWER SITES THAT WE'RE USING ARE GOVERNMENT OWNED.

NONE OF THESE SITES ARE LEASED SITES.

AND THIS WILL ALLOW US TO CONNECT THE PARKER COUNTY RADIO SYSTEM TO THE NORTH TEXAS INTEROPERABILITY RADIO NETWORK, UH, WHICH IS PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS A FORT WORTH RADIO SYSTEM.

UM, IT ENCOMPASSES WITH OUR INCLUSION WILL ENCOMPASS ABOUT SIX OR 7,000 SQUARE MILES.

UH, SO IF YOU LAY THIS ON TOP OF CONNECTICUT, WHERE THE RADIO INTEROPERABILITY NETWORK WOULD COVER THE ENTIRE STATE OF CONNECTICUT.

MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? I GOT A QUESTION.

THIS IS ON THE MOTOROLA PROPOSAL, CORRECT? MM-HMM .

YES IT IS.

I HAD A QUESTION REGARDING THE, UH, THE COST ADJUSTMENTS WITH VOLATILITY ON HOW KNOW HIS BEST TO DISCUSS THAT IN THE CONTRACT.

GOT CASEY MOORE WITH MOTOROLA WITH US.

UH, GOOD MORNING.

CASEY MOORE, MOTOROLA.

ALL RIGHT.

SO HE IS ON PAGE 1 0 1 0 6 OF THIS CONTRACT.

YOU GUYS ARE PROTECTED IF THERE'S ANY COST CHANGES IN THE, IN THE EXPENSE GOES TO THE COUNTY, THERE ARE SOME LIMITATIONS TO THAT IF IT, I DON'T ANTICIPATE THAT, BUT THAT IS A STATEMENT THERE.

IT ALSO, BUT THERE'S NOTHING IN THERE IF THERE'S ANY COST DECREASES TO HELP THE COUNTY OUT EITHER, THAT'S TRUE.

BUT WE RUN IT AS A OVERALL END-TO-END PROJECT.

SO IF WE HAVE ADDITIONAL COSTS, WE DON'T COME BACK TO HIT THE SCOPE.

WE DON'T COME BACK AND DO A TIME OF MATERIALS.

THIS IS ONLY IF OUR LABOR RATES END UP WERE TO GO ABOVE.

I THINK IT'S 5% THAT'S LISTED IN THERE.

UM, SO IT'S, IT'S, THIS IS ONLY THE LABOR.

UM, PROBABLY MATERIAL.

IT'S ABOUT MATERIAL.

I THINK IT'S 5%.

SO IF YOU KNOW THE MATERIAL COSTS NOW, I DON'T KNOW WHY.

WELL, WE, YOU'RE NOT JUMPING ON THOSE TO PROTECT VOLATILITY.

THIS PROJECT IS PREDOMINANTLY LABOR.

WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS WE'RE NOT, I MEAN, I SAW THAT IN THE MONEY TOO.

UM, I MEAN THAT, THAT IS THE TERMS IN THERE.

I MEAN, THEY'RE, THEY WOULD BE NEGOTIABLE IF YOU GUYS WANT TO PUSH BACK ON IT, I COULD ASK, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'D BE ABLE TO MOVE MUCH, YOU KNOW, LOWER ON THAT 5%.

UM, I GUESS WHAT I WOULD SAY IS YOU, YOU'VE RUN SEVERAL PROJECTS WITH US, THAT LANGUAGE IS IN THERE.

WE'VE NEVER ONCE TRIGGERED IT.

WE DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO NOT BE BACK UP HERE ASKING FOR MORE FUNDS FOR OUR PROJECTS.

WE RUN IT AS A, AS A FULL SOLUTION.

TO UNDERSTAND THIS LANGUAGE BECAUSE YOU SEEMED LIKE YOU GUYS WERE REAL PROTECTED AND THE COUNTY, WE DIDN'T, I DIDN'T SEE A LOT OF LANGUAGE ON HOW QUICK ARE YOU MOVING ON LOCKING IN THE PRICES ON THIS HARDWARE OR I UNDERSTAND THE, THE, THE PRICE CHANGE OF 5% OR WHATEVER ON THE RIGHT.

SO IF WE, YOU KNOW, THE OVERAGES FROM THIS CURRENT PROJECT, IF WE HAVE TO SPEND MORE TIME AND MATERIAL OUT OF OUR POCKET, WE WILL DO THAT AS LONG AS IT'S STILL DEFINED BY THE SCOPE THAT'S IN THE PROJECT, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

SO IF WE MISQUOTED DAVE'S MATERIALS, WE DON'T COME BACK AND ASK YOU FOR THAT.

UH, THIS IS JUST TO PROTECT US ON THAT ODD CHANCE THAT, YOU KNOW, CPI DOES SOMETHING LIKE IT DID A FEW YEARS AGO.

YEAH, I KNOW.

THAT'S WHY IT'S A CONCERN FOR ME.

YES, SIR.

I'M A NEWER COMMISSIONER HERE THAT MISSED OUT ON A LOT OF PRIOR CONTRACTS YOU GUYS HAD WITH THE COUNTY.

YES, SIR.

BUT I ALSO CAME IN AFTER THE EAST ANNEX AND I SAW HOW A LOT OF THINGS HAVE HAPPENED.

I'VE SEEN 40% COST INCREASES ON ROAD CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, THESE KIND OF THINGS.

I FEEL LIKE IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS.

AND THIS WAS THE TIME I HAD TO YES, SIR.

TO ADDRESS IT.

AND IT LOOKED TO ME LIKE IT WAS, I WAS WONDERING WHO NEGOTIATED THIS CONTRACT

[00:45:01]

THE LABOR SIDE, WHICH I SAW A LOT OF IT WAS THE DESIGN AND, AND THE, THE ENGINEERING COMPONENT.

I DID SEE THAT.

SO I MEAN, I'M NOT, I UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE AND THE TIMEFRAME OF THIS, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO DOING MY JOB UP HERE, I FEEL LIKE THAT NEEDED TO BE LOOKED AT.

SO I WANTED TO DISCUSS IT.

YES, SIR.

I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS RELATED TO THAT.

I MEAN, FOR ME, UH, ON THIS SIDE, WHAT WE'RE DOING PROMISE COURT IS WE EXECUTE THIS PRETTY QUICK.

IT IT IS FULLY FUNDED BY THE CALL GRANT THAT WE RECEIVED.

UH, PRETTY MUCH ASSURANCE IT'S GONNA BE A HUNDRED PERCENT.

UH, THAT'S WHY WE HAD IT BROKE OUT WITH COG TO DO MILESTONE PAYMENTS AND THAT'S WHY I'M GONNA PRESENT MILESTONES AS THINGS PROGRESS.

AND IF WE HAVE ANYTHING, WE'LL CATCH IT UP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

BUT, UH, I'M HOLDING THEM FEET TO THE FIRE BEST I CAN.

I APPRECIATE IT.

THAT'S WHAT, BUT I WILL, I WILL PRESENT THEM MILESTONE PAYMENTS AS THEY COME IN.

I UNDERSTAND.

AS WE, AND I'M, I HAVE A LOT OF CONFIDENCE.

YOU WILL.

WELL, I APPRECIATE IT, JAMES.

MOVE TO ITEM IN ON THE ELECTIONS BUILDING 8 0 1 SANTA FE DRIVE PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.

UM, WE'RE IN IN ANY OTHER DISCUSSION.

ALL I FAVOR, MOTION CARRIES POP

[8.M. Elections Building, 801 Santa Fe Dr., proposal for construction services. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

SO WE RECEIVED A COUPLE OF, UM, CO-OP CONTRACT PROPOSALS, ONE FROM NA CONTRACTING AND ONE FROM MOORE.

UM, UM, COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RENOVATIONS AT THE ELECTIONS BUILDING.

UM, NA'S PROPOSAL CAME IN AT FOR THE BASE PROPOSAL CAME IN AT 3 54, 3 14, AND THEN THEY HAD ALTERNATES THAT WERE AT 52 3 25 FOR DEMO AND INSTALLATION OF CEILING GRID AND, AND THEN, UM, LED LIGHTING FOR 89 70.

AT THIS TIME, I'M GONNA LET TIM HOPKINS WITH JACOB AND MARTIN GIVE HIS OPINION ABOUT WHAT HE RECOMMENDS THAT YOU ALL, UM, CONSIDER AWARDING.

SO WITH THAT BID ALL IN, UM, WITH THE BASE BID FROM NAE, UM, THAT PUTS US AT, UH, 498,000 245 62.

SO WE'RE UNDER THAT 500,000 MARK THAT, UM, WAS ESTABLISHED.

UM, THERE ARE SOME ALTERNATES TO, UM, IN THE EXISTING OFFICE AREAS WE HAD LEFT THE EXISTING GRID AND, AND, UM, CEILING TILES AND LIGHTING SO THAT IT'D BE FLUORESCENT.

UM, SPEAKING WITH, UH, MR. LONG, UM, HE THOUGHT IT'D BE A GOOD IDEA TO YOU REPLACE ALL THE GRID, REPLACE ALL THE CEILING TILE WITH NEW AND IT WOULD HELP HIS DEPARTMENT, UM, IF ALL THE LIGHTING GOT REPLACED TO THE COUNTY STANDARD, NOT BE WITH THE OLD FLUORESCENT LIGHTS, BUT UPDATED TO THE NEW LED LIGHTS.

THAT'S WHAT THOSE ALTERNATES ARE ABOUT.

UM, THE, THE 89 74 WOULD BE IF THE BUILDING AND GROUNDS PURCHASED THE LED LIGHTS THAT THEY USE, AND THEN NAE WOULD INSTALL, UH, THOSE LIGHTS.

SO THAT'S WHAT THE 89 BUT THEN THE 52, IF I'M RIGHT, MY, THE 52 WAS FOR THE NEW CEILING GRADE, NEW CEILING TILE THREW OUT AND THE DEMO OF THE OLD.

BUT THAT WOULD PUT US OVER, UM, THE, UH, 500,000 ESTABLISHED BUDGET WITH THOSE TWO ALTERNATES.

ANY QUESTIONS? SO 52 WAS THE, WAS THE LAYING TILE CEILING AND THEN THE 89 89 70, WAS THE LABOR TO INSTALL OR THE SWAP OUT TO THE LED CORRECT.

WITH BUILDING GROUNDS PROVIDING THE THE LIGHTING FIXTURES? YES, SIR.

UM, EFFICIENCY AND OVERALL OPERATIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS, ANY COMMENTS? I, I'M NOT SURE.

I THINK THE LEDS ARE BE QUITE A BIT OF AN IMPROVEMENT,

[00:50:01]

I DON'T KNOW.

ENERGY EFFICIENCY, BUT ALSO, YEAH, BETTER ON THE EYES, BETTER ON WORKING, WORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH THE EMPLOYEES OVER, WE WERE OVER THERE, THOSE LIGHT FIXTURES LOOKED A LITTLE AGED.

AND I THINK IF WE'RE DOING ALL NEW UPGRADES AND NEW FINISH OUT OVER THERE, I THINK THEY'RE GONNA STAND OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB.

THE EXISTING ONES.

IT'S ALL, THAT IS MY OPINION BACK OF HOUSE.

BUT IT'S YOUR DAY-TO-DAY EMPLOYEES THAT WOULD BE IN THERE.

WHAT DOES THAT RAISE IT TO? YOU HAVE ALL THAT FROM TWO FIVE TO WHAT? SEVEN.

I WAS GONNA ASK HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE ALLOCATED TO THIS.

500,000.

AND THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE PARKING LOT.

500,000 INCLUDES ENGINEERING.

THE DEMO THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE IN THE CONSTRUCTION.

500 THOUSANDS NOT ORIGINALLY, ORIGINALLY DESIGNED OR WE DIDN'T DESIRE IT TO INCLUDE PARKING.

RIGHT? CORRECT.

Y'ALL, Y'ALL INCLUDED IN THE, IN THE 2024 BUDGET UNDER, UM, BUILDING GROUNDS, UH, 179,600 FOR PARKING LOT.

SO YOU'RE ASKING BASICALLY FOR US TO GO FROM 5,000, OUR ESTABLISHED LIMIT TO 5 60, 61 OR 2 5 61.

THAT'S COMPLETELY REMOVING ALL THE GRID AND CEILING TILES, RIGHT? CORRECT.

AND LIGHTING, REPLACING ALL THOSE, RIGHT? YES.

AND MR, HE'S HE'S NOT HERE.

HE STEPPED OUT.

HE, HE HAD TO, WE WERE TO MAKE THAT CHANGE.

WHERE WOULD THE MONEY COME FROM OVERALL, THE 52 3 NUMBER? IF THAT ONE WASN'T TAKEN, YOU ARE WE REUSING EXISTING? WE REUSED THE EXISTING GRID AND THEN AS LIKE NORMAL MAINTENANCE, IF THERE WERE STAIN TILES, THE COUNTY WOULD SWAP THOSE OUT.

EVERYTHING THAT WAS IN THE LOBBY AND THE NEW AREA THAT WOULD BE, UM, VOTING WAS ALL NEW, ALL NEW LIGHTS, ALL NEW CEILING GRID.

IT WAS LEAVING EVERYTHING THAT WAS EXISTING IN BACK OF HOUSE, EXISTING OFFICES, UM, LEAVING THAT IN PLACE.

ANY QUESTIONS? SO SO THE PUBLIC AREA, THE PRIMARY PUBLIC AREA IS GETTING THE NEW CEILING TILE? YES.

WELL, I'D MAKE THE MOTION HERE THAT WE ACCEPT THE BASE BID WITH THE, THE LIGHTING, UM, OPTION AND FOREGO REPLACING THAT DROP GEARHEAD IN THE BACK OFFICE SPACE THAT'S PROPOSED HERE OF THAT 52 3 35.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER.

HA, WOULD YOU, I'M SORRY, THE, WHAT'S THE TOTAL? THE, UH, 5 0 8 2 15.

WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? CARRIE PAVO.

ITEM N, DISCUSS AND TAKE NECESSARY ACTION REGARDING ARPA FUNDS.

[8.N. Discuss and take necessary action regarding ARPA Projects. (Kim Rivas / Commissioner Walden) ]

ARPA PROJECTS, KIM.

OKAY, SO WE WANNA BEGIN.

UM, MILLSAP WASTEWATER PROJECT IS REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL A HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FUNDING FOR SUBSURFACE U UTILITY LOCATES THROUGHOUT THE ROUTES OF THE PROPOSED SEWER.

REMAINS TO IDENTIFY AND LOCATE ANY EXISTING VARIED UTILITIES SUCH AS POWER CABLES, COMMUNICATION LINES, GAS LINES, AND WATER LINES THAT MAY COME INTO CONFLICT WITH A PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM.

SO LET, LET'S, LET'S BACK UP AND LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE HERE.

WE, WE ARE, UH, UH, OUR COMMITTEE HAS MET AND MADE EVERY EFFORT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO SEND ANY OF THIS MONEY BACK.

AND SO SOME, SOME THINGS THAT COME IN LATER.

AND THEY WERE APPROVED BY, UH, THE COMMITTEE AND THERE'S A LIST OF THEM HERE AND I GUESS WE'RE APPROVING THOSE ONE AT A TIME.

BUT THEY ARE, ARE ALL WITH THE INTENT OF MAKING SURE THAT THERE'S NO MONEY LEFT OVER.

SO THIS, THIS CAME IN, THIS, THIS ADDITIONAL DEAL FOR MILLSAP, UH, CAME IN AS DID LATER, AS DID THE RADIO REPEATER PROJECT.

THAT'S NEXT.

THE DISPATCH FURNITURE FOR THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE EXPANSION

[00:55:01]

OF THE JAIL.

UM, AND THEN THE WATER STUDY FREEZE NICHOLS, THE AMENDMENT TO THAT.

AND THAT SHOULD BRING US TO, UH, ZERO AT THE END OF THE DAY, MR. HEER IS LOOKING FOR ZERO AND WE FOUND ZERO RIGHT HERE.

SO ALL OF THESE ARE PROJECTS THAT WERE APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE TO GET US TO THE ZERO SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO SEND ANY MONEY BACK.

AND IF FOR ANY REASON THAT ANY, UH, THING ANY OF THESE DIDN'T COST AS MUCH OR THE MONEY DID WASN'T SPENT, IT CAN ROLL OVER INTO, UH, OUR WATER STUDY WITH THE ENGINEERS BECAUSE WE HAVE ENOUGH SCOPE IN THAT, UH, AGREEMENT TO ALLOW THAT TO TAKE PLACE.

SO ANY EXTRA MONEY IS GONNA GO TO THE WATER STUDIES THERE.

SO, UH, WE HAVE THESE LISTED INDIVIDUALLY, HOWEVER, UH, THEY'VE ALL BEEN APPROVED.

AND MY MY SUGGESTION IS WE APPROVE ALL OF THEM AS THEY, WE HAVE TO DO ONE BY ONE.

WE CAN, IF WE NEED TO DISCUSS ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, UM, FOR THE, YOU WANNA TALK ABOUT THAT YET? WELL, LET'S, WE'RE GONNA GO THROUGH 'EM ONE BY ONE.

LET'S DO THIS ONE.

YEAH, WE'LL TAKE 'EM ONE AT A TIME.

ITEM ONE ON THE MILLSAP WASTEWATER PROJECT.

ADDITIONALLY FOR A HUNDRED THOUSAND FUNDING FOR THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATION LOCATES THROUGHOUT THE ROUTES OF THE PROPOSED SEWER MAINS TO IDENTIFY AND LOCATE ANY EXISTING BURIED UTILITIES SUCH AS POWER CABLES, COMMUNICATION LINES, GAS LINES, OR WATER LINES THAT MAY COME IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM OR THE SEWER SYSTEM.

I'M SORRY, THAT IS ITEM ONE.

THAT, THAT'S RIGHT.

AND, AND THIS WAS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROPOSAL THAT HAD ALREADY COME.

IT WAS JUST AN ADDITIONAL ASK.

SO, UH, I MOVE TO APPROVE MR. WATERS MADE THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

I'LL SECOND IT.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? I THINK WE ALREADY HAD IT ON THERE.

WE ALREADY HAD COMMISSIONER YOU ALREADY HAD IT.

YEAH, WE ALREADY HAD IT.

SO.

COMMISSIONER CONLEY HAS MADE THE SECOND.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM TWO ON THE PARKER COUNTY ISDS RADIO REPEATER PROJECT WITH MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS ON THE M-C-A-H-G-A-C CO-OP CONTRACT NUMBER 17 7 2 4.

SO THIS WOULD ADD 15, UH, 15 REPEATERS AT THE SCHOOLS IN THE, IN PARKER COUNTY FOR A TOTAL OF 289,008 19 AND 14 CENTS.

OKAY, MOTION TO MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES PAVO.

ITEM THREE ON THE PARKER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DISPATCH FURNITURE PROJECT WITH RUSS BASSETT.

HGAC CO-OP CONTRACT NUMBER ECO SEVEN DASH 23.

SO THIS WOULD BE THE FURNISHINGS FOR THE DISPATCH EXPANSION AND YOU ALL HAD APPROVED, UM, THE FURNISHINGS PLUS ENGINEERING SERVICES, UM, TO BE PAID FOR OUT OF ARPA FUNDS FOR THE DISPATCH EXPANSION.

AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT FOR THE FURNISHINGS WOULD BE 1 76.

6 0 3 70.

MOTION MOVE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

OH, OKAY.

ITEM FOUR, PRO PARKER COUNTY JAIL EXPANSION, MEDICAL ISOLATION, ASBESTOS STUDY EXPENSE.

SO YOU ALL APPROVED THE GEL EXPANSION, UH, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, UM, AT THE LAST COURT, BUT WE DID NOT DISCUSS AN ASBESTOS STUDY FOR THAT EXPANSION.

AND SO IT, UM, WE HAVE RECEIVED A PROPOSAL FROM ECOSYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.

WHO DID THE, THE, UM, STUDY FOR THE CHILLER RELOCATE HERE IN THE MAIN COURTHOUSE SEVERAL YEARS AGO.

AND THEIR PROPOSAL IS $2,450 FOR THAT STUDY.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HA.

AND THE DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ON ITEM.

SO WE NEED TO, BEFORE WE GO TO THAT FIVE, WELL I HAVE A NO ACTION ON THIS ONE.

DO WE TAKE ACTION ON THIS? NO, WE WILL.

WE JUST NEED TO DISCUSS, UM, THE WATER CONSERVATION MARKETING, UM, RUNS WATER.

LET ME, LET ME READ THIS AND JUST OPEN THE ITEM IN ON ITEM FIVE ON THE RFQ PC 24 DASH WELL NO, NO, WE'RE NOT DOING THAT ONE YET.

SKIP IT YET 'CAUSE WE'RE JUST GOING TO DISCUSS.

OKAY, THAT'S WHAT I ASK.

ARE WE TAKING ACTION ON THIS OR NOT? WE WILL, BUT JUST WE'RE GONNA COME BACK.

ALRIGHT.

ITEM SIX, UNOBLIGATED ARPA FUNDS AND CURRENT PROJECTS.

A, UM, IF IT'S NOT A PURCHASE ORDER, SOME SORT OF, UM, STATEMENT OF WORK DETAILING THOSE OBLIGATIONS.

I'VE PROVIDED YOU ALL A BUDGET OF HOW THE ARPA FUNDS OUTSIDE OF THE LOSS REVENUE, WHICH WAS SPLIT BETWEEN THE PRECINCTS, THE 10 MILLION.

UM, THIS REPRESENTS THE REST OF THE BUDGET.

UM, SO THE ITEMS THAT WERE APPROVED TODAY FOR, UM, THAT KIM JUST DETAILED ALL OF THOSE ARE THERE ALONG WITH THE DETAILS OF WHAT THAT INCLUDES.

UM, AS COMMISSIONER WALDEN MENTIONED, WE'RE TRYING TO GET THE FINAL OBLIGATIONS.

UM, ONE THING ON THE RADIO IS WE'RE GETTING, UM, A FINAL ORDER PLACED THERE FOR THE REMAINING, UM, RADIO FUNDS THAT ARE THERE.

UM, ONE ITEM WHERE WE DO NOT HAVE AN AGREEMENT IN PLACE, AND AS WE MENTIONED, IT HAS TO BE AN EXECUTED AGREEMENT THAT HAS

[01:00:01]

AND THAT IS THE PARKER COUNTY RUNS ON WATER.

UM, SO I REACHED OUT TO THE CONTACT LAST WEEK TO SEE WHERE WE'RE AT ON THAT, UM, TO SEE IF WE COULD EXPECT TO HAVE AN AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE END OF, UM, THE MONTH.

AND SO JOHN AND I HAD A CALL WITH HER ON THURSDAY.

UM, AND SO SHE WAS SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE A DRAFT MOU BY THE END OF THE DAY, AND SO SHE DID PROVIDE THAT.

HOWEVER, SHE DID ALSO, UM, PROVIDE THIS MESSAGE THAT SHE SAID ATTACHES OUR A TEMPLATE, MOU AS DISCUSSED IN CONNECTING WITH THE TEAM.

THEY HAD SOME HESITATION ON PUSHING FORWARD WITH AN AGREEMENT WITHOUT GIVING AMPLE TIME TO IRON OUT THE DETAILS.

UM, FOR EXAMPLE, THEIR DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS OUT OF THE OFFICE AND WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW THEIR FISCAL, UM, SPONSORSHIP POLICY.

UM, ON THE CALL, SHE HAD MENTIONED THAT THEY HAVE STARTED A PARTNERSHIP THAT WILL BEGIN, UH, NEXT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR WITH THE TEXAS, UM, WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD.

UM, AND SO YOU KNOW THAT THEY WILL HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL FUNDING THAT THEY MAY BE ABLE TO, UM, ALLOCATE TO THEIR PARTNER CAMPAIGNS, BUT BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T GONE THROUGH ALL THAT, THEY'RE NOT SURE WHAT TO DO.

UM, SO IN KIND OF CLOSING HER EMAIL, SHE SAID, IS THERE A WORKAROUND HERE TO HOLD ALLOCATE ARPA FUNDS? PERHAPS A SIMPLE AGREEMENT STATING THESE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED, UM, AND THEN A FORMAL CONTRACT WILL BE SIGNED.

UM, UNFORTUNATELY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE GUIDANCE, IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT IT CANNOT BE A RESOLUTION, IT CAN'T BE A COURT ACTION OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THAT IT HAS TO BE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STIPULATED.

UM, AS I MENTIONED, WHAT, WHAT THEY'RE PROVIDING, WHAT OUR OBLIGATION IS TO PAY THEM FOR THE SERVICES THAT THEY'RE RENDERING.

AND SO I WASN'T SURE HOW TO PUSH FORWARD WITH THIS.

THE ONLY THING JOHN, AND I JUST BRIEFLY RIGHT BEFORE COURT STARTED WAS IF WE'RE ABLE TO, UM, WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT, UM, WITH THAT ORIGINAL $30,000 WITH THE SCOPE THAT, UM, COMMISSIONER HOLT HAD PROVIDED, UM, IF WE'RE ABLE TO GET THAT EXECUTED TO GO AHEAD WITH THAT, IF NOT, THEN THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO ADD THAT TO THIS ITEM NUMBER FIVE THAT WE'RE GONNA DISCUSS.

SO A REMINDER THAT WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY HAVE BUDGETED THAT MONEY, RIGHT? IT WAS BUDGETED, UM, THERE WAS AN AGENDA ITEM TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT.

AND SO I FOLLOWED UP BECAUSE MY OFFICE HAD NOT RECEIVED THAT EXECUTED AGREEMENT.

AND SO, UM, WITH, I KNOW COMMISSIONER HOLT WAS OUT LAST WEEK, SO I HAD FOLLOWED UP WITH THE CONTACT TO SEE WHERE WE'RE AT ON THAT.

UM, AND SO SHE HAD RECOMMENDED A CALL.

SO JOHN AND I TOOK THAT CALL AT THE END OF THE WEEK.

BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE'VE BUDGETED MONEY.

WE HAVE MONEY IN OUR BUDGET TO FUND THIS IN ARPA BUDGET.

WE, WE HAD MONEY IN THE BUDGET TO FUND THIS INITIALLY.

WELL, NO.

SO WHAT HAD BEEN DECIDED IS YOU GUYS WERE GONNA USE YOUR LOSS REVENUE FOR THAT IF IT WASN'T ALLOWED UNDER THE REGULAR ARPA.

AND SO I CAME BACK AND I SAW THAT THERE IS WATER CONSERVATION, IT'S NOT VERY EXPLICIT AS TO WHAT THAT IS, BUT IF IT'S WATER CONSERVATION AND WE CAN SHOW WHAT THE INTENT OF ALL THAT IS, THEN WE FELT THAT IT WAS ALLOWED UNDER REGULAR ARPA.

SO EVEN IF IT WAS UNDER THE LOSS REVENUE, WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO IT BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO HAVE AN EXECUTED AGREEMENT IN PLACE.

SO IF WE DIDN'T DO THIS WITH ARPA FUNDS AND WE MOVED IT, THEN IF WE STILL WANTED TO PROCEED WITH THAT, THEN I WOULD RECOMMEND A DIFFERENT SOURCE OF FUNDING OR TAKING OUT A CONTINGENCY IF WE NEEDED TO DO THAT.

BUT WE WEREN'T SURE FOR ARPA HOW TO, I THINK WE'D BE WILLING TO, WE DISCUSSED THIS AT BUDGET TIME, I THINK WE'D BE WILLING TO FUND THAT FROM OUR PRECINCT.

THAT WAS ONE OF THE OPTIONS WE DISCUSSED AT BUDGET WAS EACH PRECINCT WOULD FUND 7,500.

SO WOULD WE LIKE TO, SOUNDS TO ME LIKE THAT WOULD BE THE SAFER THING TO DO SINCE WE DON'T HAVE AN AGREEMENT IN PLACE.

IS THAT CORRECT? RIGHT.

WELL, IT WOULD BE BETTER NOT TO PROBABLY RUSH INTO IT.

AND THEN THAT WAY IF, IF THE, YOU KNOW, TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF THERE'S ADDITIONAL FUNDING, PERHAPS THAT 30,000 COULD ACTUALLY GO DOWN AND STILL BE ABLE TO RECEIVE WHAT WE'RE HOPING AND INTENDING TO RECEIVE WITH THE CAMPAIGN SOUNDS.

GO AHEAD.

WELL, THE UPPER TRINITY HAS ALSO INDICATED THAT THEIR FISCAL ROLLS OVER IN JANUARY ONE AND THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES THERE THAT MIGHT ALLEVIATE OUR OBLIGATIONS AS WELL, BUT THEY CAN'T COMMIT TO THAT UNTIL RIGHT JANUARY ONE.

BUT REGARDLESS, IT SOUNDS LIKE ON OUR SIDE, 7,500 FROM BOTH OF US IS REASONABLE.

IF MY MEMORY SERVES FROM BUDGET, Y'ALL WERE AMENABLE TO THAT AS WELL.

BUT I DON'T WANNA SPEAK FOR Y'ALL NOW.

NO, THAT'S GOOD.

SO THE PROCESS NEEDS TO BE THAT WE ELIMINATE THIS FROM ARPA, DROP IT, FIGURE OUT ANOTHER WAY TO FUND IT WHEN IT COMES UP, AND IF ANY, WE'RE GONNA HAVE SOME PARTNERS ALONG THE WAY AND ROLL THAT MONEY OVER.

YES, CORRECT.

WE, YES, WE WILL DISCUSS THE FUNDING AT THE POINT IN WHICH WE IRON OUT AN AGREEMENT.

OKAY, SO YOU CAN ROLL INTO FIVE THEN? YEAH.

WE'RE WAITING ON THEIR DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS TO GET BACK INTO TOWN, LOOK AT THE AGREEMENT.

AND SO JUST TO BE CLEAR ON THIS POINT THOUGH,

[01:05:01]

RIGHT.

SO I THINK WHAT WE'LL DO IS SIT, UM, RESPOND AND SAY, YOU KNOW, PARKER COUNTY WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED, HOWEVER WE WILL BE USING IN AN ALTERNATIVE SOURCE.

SO ONCE, YOU KNOW, AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, IT'D BE A GOOD IDEA TO GET ANY, EVERYONE THAT NEEDS TO BE INVOLVED, INVOLVED IN AND DISCUSS THE AGREEMENT GOING FORWARD.

SO WHAT ITEM SIX NOW, NOW FIVE.

NOW WE CAN GO BACK TO NUMBER FIVE.

DO WE NEED TO, WE'RE ON, WE'RE ON ITEM FIVE, HONOR, WHAT WE JUST DID.

NO ACTION SIR.

NO ACTION.

SO ON, ON ITEM FIVE, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION, MOTION MADE.

SO ON ON, ON ITEM FIVE, THIS WOULD BE AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PLANNING CONTRACT.

AND IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL $291,230 AND 35 CENTS ADDED TO, UM, THE CURRENT EXISTING, UM, AMOUNT FOR A TOTAL OF 1.2 8, 1 1 5 2 AND 35 CENTS.

I'LL SECOND IT.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE, IF WE CAN JUST DO IT UNDER ITEM NUMBER SIX.

I WOULD LIKE TO ASK, UM, THE BUDGET THAT YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU INCLUDES EVERYTHING THAT WAS APPROVED TODAY EXCEPT FOR, UH, THE PARKER COUNTY RUNS ON WATER AND THEN THIS ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT WITH FREEZING NICHOLS.

SO WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IF I COULD ACTUALLY, UM, GO AHEAD AND WHAT YOU SEE HERE AND THE ACTION TAKEN TODAY IS GO AHEAD AND POST THOSE, UM, BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS.

SO THAT WAY THE BUDGET IS IN THERE AS OF 1231, AND THEN I'LL PRESENT THAT ITEM AT THE NEXT COURT.

BUT YOU'VE ESSENTIALLY ESTABLISHED ALL THE BUDGETS.

I'M JUST ACTUALLY PROCESSING IT IN THE SYSTEM AND WE WILL PROVIDE YOU A COPY OF THAT AT THE NEXT COURT BOARD.

A MOTION TO THAT EFFECT.

MOTION BE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER.

HA.

MOVE TO ITEM O ON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AUTO REGISTRATION EXPANSION.

CARRIES FIVE OH

[8.O. Professional Services Agreement for Auto Registration Expansion. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen) ]

SO THIS ITEM, UM, I'M REQUESTING THAT YOU APPROVE THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WRIGHT GROUP ARCHITECTS FOR THE AUTO REGISTRATION EXPANSION AND RATIFY THIS.

UM, I GUESS WITH ALL OF THE GOINGS ON IN SEPTEMBER WITH BUDGET AND ALL THAT, THIS GOT OVERLOOKED.

UM, THE TOTAL AMOUNT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THIS PROJECT IS, UH, WAS INCLUDING IN HER BUDGETS $18,500 WITH RIGHT, THE MONEY'S ALREADY BUDGETED.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL.

P ON REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE PROJECT, MILESTONE CERTIFICATES FOR SERVICES AND TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY.

BILL ITEM

[8.P. Review and Execute the Project Milestone certificates for services and take any action the court deems necessary. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]

JOHN, YOU HAVE ANY INPUT ON THAT? I'LL TAKE NO ACTION ON ITEMS. OKAY, WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM Q.

WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION THERE.

ITEM R, APPROVE THE FOLLOWING OFFICIAL BONDS.

UH, WE WILL TAKE THOSE ONE AT A TIME UNDER BRIAN.

SORRY, SORRY.

Q WE'LL MOVE BACK TO QP.

SORRY, I LAST THINKING AT THE BOTTOM.

WE'LL MOVE BACK TO P REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE PROJECT MILESTONES, CERTIFICATES FOR SERVICE, AND TAKE ANY ACTION TO THE BOARD NECESSARY.

IT'S OKAY.

SORRY ABOUT THAT.

JAMES.

THESE ARE, I THOUGHT WE WERE AT THE BOTTOM LINE.

THESE ARE THREE MILESTONES.

I'M A QUESTION FOR APPROVAL.

PART OF THE ARPA FUNDING OF THE 700 MEGAHERTZ UPGRADE, UH, THROUGH THE COUNTY, UH, WORKED WITH THE COMMITTEE AND MOTOROLA ON THESE.

UH, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING EXTENSIVELY.

WE'RE PLAYING CATCH UP ON INVENTORY.

UH, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING WITH US.

UH, AND TO YOUR POINT ALSO, UH, SORRY, A LOT OF THINGS GOING, BUT WITH THE NEW GRANT WE JUST DID AND, AND INTEGRATION TO FORT WORTH, WE GET A 40% OFF LIST NOW, UH, GOING FORWARD WITH MOTOROLA EQUIPMENT RADIOS, RIGHT? SO, UH, WE ARE GAINING BENEFITS AND SO I'M, I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE WE'RE GETTING UNDERSTOOD.

WE'RE ABLE TO BENEFIT FROM THE BENEFITS.

I, I'VE, I'VE HELD THEM PRETTY CLOSE.

UH, THANK YOU.

WORKING WITH THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE.

I THINK THIS IS PRETTY CLEAN NEGOTIATION GOING FORWARD WITH THE MILESTONES AND, AND HOLD 'EM CLOSE TO, TO WATCH THAT CLOSELY.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ITEM Q ON NOTIFICATION OF TERMINATION OF THE LEASE OF THE RED CROSS FOR THE ONE 18 WEST COLUMBIA BUILDING DUE TO PARKER COUNTY NO LONGER OWNING THE BUILDING, BEING CURRENTLY LEASED AND TAKEN ACTION TO HORTON DEEMS NECESSARY.

CARRIE VO

[8.Q. Notification of termination of the lease for the Red Cross for the 118 West Columbia Building due to Parker County no longer owning the building being currently leased and take any action the court deems necessary. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]

AND I NEED A MOTION FROM THE COURT TO ENACT THE CLAUSE THAT ALLOWS US

[01:10:01]

TO SEND A TERMINATION NOTICE TO RED CROSS FOR THE BUILDING THAT WAS RECENTLY, UH, SOLD AT ONE 18 WEST COLUMBIA.

OKAY, COMM, UH, COMMISSIONER HALE HAS MADE THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

UH, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

CARRIE FABO.

[8.R. Approve the following Official Bonds. (Lila Deakle / Judge Deen) ]

MOVE TO ITEM R.

UH, APPROVE THE FOLLOWING OFFICIAL BONDS WILL TAKE THOSE ONE AT A TIME ON ITEM ONE, BRIANNA FOWLER, THE AUDITOR.

WE DO HAVE THAT.

UH, I'LL ANSWER A MOTION ON THAT.

MOTIONS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

SAY GOODBYE TO COMMISSIONER HALE.

CARRIE FABO.

ITEM TWO ON JOHN FOREST.

UH, WE HAVE THAT, UH, ALSO, SORRY.

MOTION IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

CARRIE FABO.

MOVE TO ITEM THREE ON THE ACCEPTING THE BOND OFFICIAL BOND FOR RU MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM FOUR.

UH, RAY WRIGHT CONSTABLE PRECINCT ONE.

THIS IS ACCEPTING THE BOND FOR THE OFFICIAL BOND.

MOTION VOTE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE.

OH.

ITEM FIVE.

JOE HARRIS JR.

UH, IS THAT ONE WE RECEIVED? OKAY, WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION ON THAT ONE.

MOVE TO ITEM SIX ON GLEN PRADER.

CONSTABLE PRECINCT THREE ON ACCEPTING THE OFFICIAL BOND MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM SEVEN, SCOTT JONES, CONSTABLE PRECINCT FOUR.

ACCEPTING THE OFFICIAL BOND COMM.

UH, COMMISSIONER HALE HAS MADE THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL ON A SECOND.

I THOUGHT I SAW A SECOND.

I SECOND IT.

OH, YOU SECOND IT.

DEPUTY CONSTABLE PRECINCT.

COMMISSIONER WALDEN AND A SECONDED THE MOTION.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR DOWN.

SORRY ABOUT THAT.

THANK I KIND OF FIGURED .

OKAY, WE'LL MOVE DOWN.

MADE ON STEPHEN A DERA, UH, DETO ON THE DEPUTY CONSTABLE PRECINCT.

ONE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THAT BOND.

UH, COMMISSIONER CONLEY HAS MADE THE APPROVAL FOR THE MOTION SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT? UH, MOTION.

ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH.

MOVE TO ITEM NINE ON LAND.

LEE PAGET.

ONE ON ACCEPTING THE OFFICIAL BOND, UH, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONY.

MOVE TO ITEM S ON DISCUSSION ONLY WILL, NO FINAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR

[8.S. Discussion only will occur and no final action will be taken regarding: (a) the active land development regulations of Parker County ("County"); and (b) land development regulation options available to the County. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]

ITEM S HOLD ON ONE SECOND.

DISCUSSION ONLY WILL OCCUR AND NO FINAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN REGARDING THE ACTIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF PARKER COUNTY.

AND I'M SORRY, THOSE ARE THE TWO.

OKAY, SO THAT'S NO ACTION ON THAT, CORRECT? I'M JUST TRYING TO, I I ACTUALLY DIDN'T READ THAT.

[8.T. Discussion and potential action may occur regarding: (a) revisions to the active subdivision and manufactured home rental community regulations of Parker County; and (b) all related matters. (John Forrest / Judge Deen) ]

AND ITEM T DISCUSSION IN PARTICULAR ACTION MAY OCCUR REGARDING SO JOHN, THAT DOESN'T BELONG ON THERE EITHER, RIGHT? THAT BE THERE AS WELL.

THAT JUST ALLOW US OUT.

AND IT TAKES US TO 11 ON A ITEM A PRECINCT ONE.

MOVE TO ITEM UNDER

[9. ACCEPT INTO THE MINUTES: ]

ITEM NINE.

ACCEPT IN THE MINUTES ITEM A PARKER COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT.

ITEM BRFQ PC 24 DASH 39 WATER STUDY A AMENDMENT ONE AND ITEM C, PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BAKER STAFF HEALTH IN DELGADO WITH ACOSTA LLP EXECUTED DOCUMENT ITEM D, EXECUTE EXECUTED AUTOMATED BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION FOR DELL AUTO REPAIR LLC FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS.

ITEM E EXECUTED AUTOMATED BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION FOR RTB TRUCK SALES FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS.

ITEM F EXECUTED AUTOMATED BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION FOR TRAILERS PLUS SALES INCORPORATED FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS.

ITEM G, EXECUTED ASSET FORFEITURE CONTRACT ITEM H EXECUTED ALEDO PUBLIC LIBRARY CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025.

ITEM I EXECUTE, EXCUSE ME.

EXECUTED CONTRACT WITH COOK COUNTY FOR INMATE HOUSING AND ITEM J, EXECUTED CONTRACT WITH VICTOR STAFF HEALTH, DELGADO ACOSTA, LLP AND ITEM K EXECUTED ARPA EXTENSIONS.

THE RECORDS SHOW THAT THOSE ARE ACCEPTED INTO THE MINUTES.

UH, WE'VE DONE 10

[11.A. PRECINCT 1 (Part 1 of 2) ]

[01:15:01]

KIM, DO I NEED TO SIGN THESE FOR YOU? THIS IS THE INTER LOCAL THAT JOB DISAGREE.

WHILE WE'RE GETTING READY, I'M GONNA RUN THIS ONE BUT NOT, WE'LL TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK.

PRECINCT FOUR, TWO, WHAT IS THAT CORRECT? FOUR.

[11.D. PRECINCT 4 (Part 1 of 2)]

NUMBER TWO, I APPROVE THE PROCESS FOR LOWERING THE SPEED LIMIT ON BANKHEAD HIGHWAY AT KELLEY ROAD IN PRECINCT FOUR.

IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

WOULD YOU RECEIVE AN APPLICATION FOR THE REQUEST TO LOWER THE SPEED LIMITS? UH, WE DID RUN ADS IN THE PAPER AS PER THE STATUTE AS WELL.

WE'RE GONNA OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1210.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? COME ON UP.

COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME PLEASE.

MY NAME IS MELISSA HOWELL AND I JUST WANT TO TELL Y'ALL I OPPOSE THE SPEED LIMIT CHANGE.

I DON'T THINK THAT IT'S GONNA BE BENEFICIAL AND UM, I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND IT AND THE DATE OF, YOU KNOW, THAT IT WAS COLLECTED THAT, UM, MAKE Y'ALL DECIDE, MAKE YOU DECIDE WHETHER IT NEEDS TO BE LOWERED OR NOT.

'CAUSE I KNOW IN THE FUTURE IF IT WAS TO, I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF HOUSING GOING ON AND IN THE FUTURE IF IT WAS TO EVER BE RAISED AGAIN, IT WILL COST THE COUNTY MONEY AND YOU KNOW, SURVEYS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

WHEREAS RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST EASY TO LOWER IT.

UM, I KNOW THERE'S SOME HEAD ON COLLISIONS, BUT THE DATA DOESN'T SAY THAT THERE'S ANYTHING, YOU KNOW, THE INFLUX OF VEHICLES IS CAUSING MORE ACCIDENTS OR ANYTHING.

SO IF THAT'S NOT TRUE, I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW WHERE YOUR, THAT DATA COMES FROM.

THIS ORIGINATED FROM SIGNED PETITION FROM RESIDENCE ALONG THAT ON KELLY ROAD FOR YES MA'AM.

SHE WAS LIKE, NO, I THINK THAT'S A DIFFERENT AREA.

PEOPLE AND I, I RECEIVED NUMEROUS PHONE CALLS, FOLKS THAT LIVE THERE THAT HAVE DRIVEWAYS CARS THAT ARE PASSING OTHERS YES.

IN THOSE SPOTS AND YOU KNOW, THERE CAN BE SOME, THOSE HILLS IN THERE AND THERE'S BEEN SOME CLOSE CALLS.

UH, WE, WE'VE TRIED TO HELP WITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.

OUR LOCAL CONSTABLE SCOTT JONES IS THEY'VE, THEY'VE DEDICATED RESOURCES TO TRY TO HELP MANAGE AND UH, IT'S NOT JUST SPEEDING VEHICLES, BUT AS YOU MENTIONED THOSE, THOSE LOADED CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES WHEN THEY'RE COMING THROUGH OUR CONCRETE, CONCRETE TRUCKS ROLLING THROUGH THERE AT PRETTY HIGH RATE OF SPEED AND ROLLING A LOT OF WEIGHT.

THERE'S, THERE'S A LOT OF CONCERN AND THAT, THAT CAME AS A SIGNED PETITION.

WELL, UM, I SPOKE WITH THE, I KNOW WHICH ACCIDENT YOU'RE SPEAKING OF AND I'M NOT REFERRING TO ONE IN PARTICULAR, MA'AM.

ONE, OKAY.

NO MA'AM.

WELL, THERE IS ONE THAT YOU KNOW WAS RIGHT THERE AFTER A TURN AND I SPOKE TO SOMEONE WHO LIVES RIGHT THERE IN THEIR DRIVEWAY JUST LAST NIGHT AND, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, ASKED THEM, YOU KNOW, WHAT, WHAT COULD HAVE CHANGED THE SPEED LIMIT, YOU KNOW, AND THEY DON'T KNOW FOR SURE, BUT THEY DO NOW REALIZE THAT THERE IS PASSING ZONES.

THEY HAVE REQUESTED, UM, NO PASSING ZONE SIGNS MM-HMM AND IT TO BE STRIPED AND I AGREE WITH THEM RIGHT THERE.

YES MA'AM.

UM, SLOWING IT DOWN.

UM, IF YOU'RE ON THAT ROAD, THE LONGER SOMEONE'S DOWN IN THAT HILL, I MEAN RIGHT NOW IT'S, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PASS WITH CARE, YOU KNOW, UM, IF YOU GO DOWN THAT HILL AND IT'S TAKING PEOPLE LONGER TO GET BACK UP AND BE SEEN, THAT'S A LOT MORE CARS THAT ARE JUST GOING TO PLAY CHICKEN WITH THE, YOU KNOW, NOT SEEING IT.

IF YOU SLOW IT DOWN, THEY'RE GONNA BE DOWN THERE LONGER, YOU KNOW, KEEPING IT, YOU KNOW, FROM UM, JUST REACHING OUT TO UH, PEOPLE THAT 40 FIVE'S GOOD, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE IT HIGHER.

NOBODY IS REQUESTING IT TO BE LOWER AS FAR AS I KNOW.

NOW I DID CALL YOUR OFFICE THIS MORNING AND YES MA'AM SHE DID.

UM, AT FIRST SHE ASKED ME, SHE SAID, WELL PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED, UH, YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN SOME SIGNATURES.

YES MA'AM.

AND AFTER TALKING TO HER FOR A MINUTE

[01:20:01]

NO.

SO WERE YOU SURE IT'S FOR KELLY ROAD? THAT YES MA'AM, WE DID.

HAS MA'AM COLLECTED SIGNATURES? YES MA'AM.

UM, THIS WASN'T JUST ARBITRARILY PICKED OUT A BLUE SKY AND SAID, WELL WE NEED TO LOWER THE SPEED LIMIT DOWN HERE.

NO MA'AM.

I MEAN DO YOU, YOU REALLY THINK IT'S GONNA MAKE A CHANGE? I SAY, I MEAN IF SPEED LIMITS ARE THE PROBLEM, YOU KNOW, THEN I MEAN HOW COME WE'RE ALREADY GOING 35 MILES AN HOUR BEHIND ROCK TRUCKS? I HAVE YET TO GET BEHIND ONE THAT'S GOING 70.

LIKE EVERYONE STATES, EVERYONE FLIES DOWN THERE.

SO IT WON'T GET ANY SAFER RAISING THE SPEED LIMIT.

NO, I'M NOT ASKING IT FOR IT TO BE RAISED.

I'M ASKING FOR IT JUST TO BE LEFT ALONE.

YOU KNOW WHAT IS THE SPEED LIMIT NOW? 45.

45.

AND YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE IT TO WHAT? 40 40? YES SIR.

AND IT'S REALLY, THAT'S REALLY TOO SLOW.

OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

OKAY, ANYBODY ELSE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH? AND THESE ROADS ARE ALL DIFFERENT, SO IT'S NOT ALWAYS AN APPLES TO APPLES, BUT WE'VE NOT HAD ANY FATALITIES THAT I'M AWARE OF.

NOW, KNOCK ON WOOD, AND HOPEFULLY I'M NOT FORGETTING ANY, ON NINE 20 SINCE WE REDUCED THE SPEED LIMIT FROM, SINCE WE REDUCED THE SPEED LIMIT BY FIVE MILES AN HOUR.

NOW GRANTED THAT WAS 60 TO 55, BUT THAT FIVE MILE AN HOUR REDUCTION APPEARS TO HAVE HAD A VERY SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT ON THE ACCIDENT RATE.

SO SOMETIMES FIVE MILES AN HOUR CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

I'M NOT SAYING THAT'S THE CASE HERE, BUT LOWERING THE SPEED LIMIT CAN BE A VERY EFFECTIVE TOOL IN 10 YEARS.

THERE HASN'T BEEN A FATALITY THERE THIS YEAR, THERE 10 YEARS BEEN TWO AND A LOT OF THE ACCIDENTS ARE DUE TO DRUNK DRIVING AND UNLICENSED DRIVERS ON THE ROAD.

NONE OF THEM HAVE BEEN AT TO ACTUALLY SPEAK, YOU KNOW.

IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO, UH, SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? WE'RE IN A PUBLIC HEARING HERE.

NONE.

SEE NONE.

WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1216 AND GO TO THE AUTUMN.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

WHAT'S THE LENGTH NOW THAT WE'RE OUTTA THE PUBLIC HEARING, WHAT'S THE LENGTH THAT IS TO BE IMPACTED? LENGTH OF ROAD LINK THE DISCUSSION.

GO AHEAD JAMES.

I DON'T, I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT LENGTH.

I HAVE A, A DESCRIPTION.

SO IT'S, UH, 1187 TO 3 77 PORTIONS OF KELLY ROAD EAST BANK HEAD SIDE TO THE DEAD END AT CLEAR FORK TRINITY REDUCTION ALSO.

SO BASICALLY IT WAS THE, THE WHOLE LENGTH OF KELLY ROAD IS WHAT WAS DISCUSSED OR WHAT IS PRESENTED.

DO YOU HAVE A, IS THAT A MILE? TWO MILES? UH, PROBABLY TWO MILES.

JULIE ROAD'S PRETTY, NO, IT WAS MORE THAN TWO MILES.

IT'S UH, DO YOU KNOW FROM 3 77 NORTH 1187? I WOULD SAY THE BETTER PART OF FIVE IS.

YEAH, IT'S MORE THAN, MORE THAN DOUBLE.

YEAH, IT'S, IT IS FIVE MILES.

THERE'S SOME TIGHT AND NARROW UP AND DOWNS AND LEFT AND RIGHTS AND THEN THERE'S SOME BIG WIDE OPEN STRAIGHTAWAYS.

UM, BUT AT THIS POINT, BECAUSE OF PUBLIC REACHING OUT AND SIGNING THE PETITION AND PEOPLE BEING CONCERNED ON THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC AND THE SPEED LIMIT THAT'S RELATED DOWN THERE, I'M GONNA MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR.

MOTION CARRIES BY VOTE.

MOVE BACK TO ITEM 11, A PRECINCT ONE.

[11.A. PRECINCT 1 (Part 2 of 2)]

APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS GRACE RIDGE CONSISTING OF 12.9988 ACRES DEVELOPED BY RICHARD CLEM AND MARK AND CASEY JOHNSON LOCATED OFF OF SOUTH FM SEVEN 30 WITH THE WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.

THIS IS A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION.

LOT ONE HAS 5.046 ACRES, LOT TWO S, 7.9941 ACRES.

UH, WE HAVE ALREADY WEIGHED THE GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS.

THEY DO HAVE ROAD FURNACE OFF OF FM SEVEN 30 AND WELL WATER IS GONNA BE YOUR WATER SOURCE COUNSELOR.

EVERYTHING GOOD FOR A FINAL? UH, YES, EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER.

THE TAX CERTIFICATE HAS A BALANCE OF $15,153 AND 53 CENTS.

UH, ADDITIONALLY, UH, SINCE THERE'S MORE THAN ONE PROPERTY, THERE

[01:25:01]

IS ADDITIONAL BALANCE OF 1,134 AND 79 CENTS.

THE PERMITTING DEPARTMENT HAS APPROVED PRIVATE WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND THEY HAVE MET ALL OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

OH.

MOVE TO ITEM TWO.

WANNA BEGIN THE PRELIMINARY PROCESS WHERE SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS CLEARVIEW ESTATES AND THE ETJ CITY OF SPRINGTOWN CONSIST OF 107.88 ACRES DEVELOPED BY TWO H HM.

INVESTMENTS LOCATED OFF OF GOSHEN ROAD WITH WALNUT CREEK, SUD AND PRECINCT ONE.

AND THIS SUBDIVISION IS GONNA HAVE 84 LOTS IN IT.

THEY RANGE IN SIZE FROM ONE ACRE, 2.3 ACRES.

UH, THEY ARE GONNA BE PUTTING IN FOUR ROADS THAT WILL BE COME COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADS AND WALNUT CREEK IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE COUNSELOR.

UH, DID WE EVER GET WITH A CITY ABOUT THEM DOING AWAY WITH THEIR ETJ? UH, THEY HAVE RELEASED THIS PROPERTY OVER TO THE COUNTY TO HANDLE THE PLATING.

PARTICULAR ON THIS PROJECT FOR JUST THIS PROJECT? YES, SIR.

SPOKE OUTSIDE OF THAT, BUT RIGHT.

BE A WHOLE CITY COUNCIL ISSUE.

OKAY, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES AND EVERYTHING IS OKAY? MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM THREE, APPROVE THE WAIVER FOR GROUNDWATER STUDY FROM AFFORDABLE WATER WELL WITH A SUBDIVISION BEING BE KNOWN AS HLE ESTATES PHASE TWO AND PRECINCT ONE.

AND THEY DID PULL A REPORT THAT SAYS THE YIELD IS 15 GPM AT A PUMP DEPTH OF 480 FEET.

OKAY, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM FOUR.

BEGIN THE PRELIMINARY TO SUBDIVISION.

BE KNOWN IS HENKEL ESTATES PHASE TWO CONSISTENT OF 2.177 ACRES.

A ABOVE BY RODNEY HENKEL, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF JUANITA HENKEL COFFEE ESTATES LOCATED OFF OF OLD SPRINGTOWN ROAD GLOBAL.

EXCUSE ME, WELL, WATER AND PRECINCT ONE.

THIS A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION.

UH, THIS IS JUST RAW LAND.

THEY'RE GONNA BUILD A BARN TO MINI ON IT.

UH, THEY DO HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE OFF COLD SPRINGTOWN ROAD.

THEY ARE GONNA BE DEDICATING 0.177 ACRES OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY, UH, FOR THIS PROJECT.

AND WELL WATER IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.

COUNCILOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES? UH, YES, FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSE.

EVERYTHING'S IN ORDER.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH.

ITEM FIVE.

ACCEPT THE PERFORMANCE BOND FOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS TERRA VISTA LOCATED IN PRECINCT ONE.

WE APPROVE THIS, UH, FINAL FLAT LAST COMMISSIONER'S COURT.

WE'D LIKE TO ACCEPT THIS, UM, BOND THAT IS IN THE AMOUNT OF 311, 300 $11,000 100, $311,135.

COUNCIL, ARE ALL THE PAPERWORK GOOD? UH, YES.

IT'S OKAY.

MOTION MOVE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE, ANY OF THE DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL THE PAPER CARRIED FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM

[11.B. PRECINCT 2 ]

B PRECINCT TWO ITEM ONE.

APPROVE THE VARIANCE OF THE PARKER COUNTY SUBDIVISION RULES AND REGULATIONS OF PARKER COUNTY.

OSSF RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR LOT ONE AND A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS BRADSHAW ROAD EDITION.

MRS. A THREE ACRE, UH, THREE LOTS SUBDIVISION, TWO LOTS HAVE ONE ACRE IN SIZE, ONE LOT HAS 0.997 OF AN ACRE.

UH, THIS IS NOT A FAMILY, UH, TRACK OF LAND.

THIS IS JUST, UM, A DEVELOPER DIVIDING THIS PROPERTY.

SO WE WOULD HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE OF OUR RULES AND OUR OSSF RULES FOR THIS TO HAPPEN.

I THINK RUSTY HAS SOME COMMENTS ON THIS PROJECT.

I HAVE LOOKED AT THE LOT IT WOULD SUPPORT AN OSSF, HOWEVER, AFTER JOHN AND I, WE'VE HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS.

I MEAN, IT IS BELOW AN ACRE.

SO ONCE THIS DOOR'S OPENED, YOU KNOW HOW MANY YOU SAW WEST BRADSHAW? YES.

THAT, THAT SUBDIVISION WAS PRIOR TO OH SEVEN WHEN WE ADOPTED THE ONE ACRE.

HOWEVER, ONCE THIS STORE'S OPENED, YOU KNOW HOW MANY DEVELOPERS ARE GONNA COME SAY, WELL I WANT DO LOTS LESS THAN AN ACRE.

YOU KNOW, GET A VARIANCE.

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 0.997 AND 0.85? AND THEN WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 0.85 AND 0.78? EXACTLY.

AND CURRENT CURRENTLY MINIMUM STATE RULES, WHICH WE BUT ONE ACRE, THE HALF ACRE WE, WE WOULD .

UM, YEP.

I'M PERSONALLY NOT IN FAVOR OF BREACHING THAT ONE ACRE MINIMUM.

I MEAN IT A NUMBER IS A NUMBER.

WE'RE GONNA DO IT SOMEWHERE LATER ON.

IT'S, IT'S NOT THE ONLY ONE ON HERE TODAY IS IT? NO SIR.

[01:30:01]

SO THAT'S, THAT, THAT'S WHAT QUARTER AN OTHERWISE RENDER THAT NOT USABLE.

ADDITIONALLY, IF YOU CAN BUY 'EM THROUGH THOSE LOTS, YOU HAVE TWO QUARTER ACRES.

THAT'S WHERE IF YOU'RE COMBINING WAS GRANDFATHER, YOU CAN MAKE IT LARGER.

UNDERSTAND THE DEVELOPER REQUESTED A VARIANCE COME BEFORE THE COURT.

BUT I PERMITTING IF WE'RE GOING, IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE RULES, IT NEEDS TO BE THE RULES.

YOU KNOW, THAT'S SO YOUR RECOMMENDATION RUSTY, IS THAT WE NOT APPROVE IT'S NOT NOT APPROVE IT.

THEN 'CAUSE IT, BEFORE Y'ALL SIT DOWN FOR LUNCH, EVERY DEVELOPER'S GOING TO KNOW OR GRANT VARIANCE IS LESS THAN AN ACRE.

I'M GONNA FOLLOW YOUR LEAD ON THIS ONE THEN.

PRIOR TO PRIOR TO OH SEVEN.

SO I, I'M SEEING NO ACTION AS THE POSSIBLE OUTCOME OF THIS PORTION OF THIS, UH, AGENDA ITEM HERE.

WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION ON ITEM ONE.

IS THAT THE DIRECTION COMMISSIONER WE'RE TAKING? YEAH, JAMIE, WE HAVEN'T, HAVE I MET WITH THIS GUY? I DON'T REMEMBER THIS ONE.

UM, LEMME SEE IF WE DID.

OH, I DON'T THINK WE HAD APPROVED THAT WITH THIS GUY.

UH, WE DID NOT.

YEAH, I'M, I'M HAPPY TO MEET WITH HIM AND DISCUSS IT IN PERSON.

BUT YEAH, TAKE NO ACTION ON THIS ITEM.

WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM TWO, APPROVE AND THERE'LL BE NO ACTION TOO.

JUDGE, NO ACTION.

APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR SUDDEN VISION KNOWN AS BRADSHAW ROAD ADDITION IN THE ETJ CITY.

THERE WAS ALSO NO ACTION, SIR.

ONE AND TWO, THANK YOU FOR TELLING ME THAT BEFORE I READ IT.

ITEM THREE, APPROVE.

THE FINAL REVISION FOR THIS IS ITEM THREE, APPROVE THE FINAL REVISION FOR A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS QUAIL SPRINGS RANCH, CONSISTENT OF 6.030 ACRES DEVELOPED BY SEAN AND MARGARET CANNON LOCATED OFF OF BISHOP DRIVE WITH WATER WELL WATER AND PRECINCT TOO.

IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

THIS IS LOT 2 34 WAS SIX ACRES.

IT'S BEING DIVIDED INTO TWO LOTS.

UH, THE PURPOSE OF THIS DIVISION IS THEY'RE GONNA USE LOT 2 35 R ONE FOR EXTRA LAND JUST AS A BUFFER IN BETWEEN THE TWO LOTS.

AND WE DID SEND OUT 146 CERTIFIED LETTERS AND RAN ADS IN THE PAPER AS PER THE STATUTE.

OKAY, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1226 ON ITEM THREE, PRECINCT TWO, ITEM B.

IS THERE ANYBODY HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? THE PUBLIC HEARING IS AT 1226 HEARING IC NINE.

WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1226 AND GO TO THE ITEM AND PROPER NOTICE WAS PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER LISTING THE DATE, TIME, LOCATION, PURPOSE OF TODAY'S HEARING, THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED TAX CERTIFICATE, IT INDICAT BALANCE OF $955 AND 26 CENTS.

PERMITTING HAS APPROVED PRIVATE WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND ALL OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.

MOTION CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM FOUR ON APPROVE THE FINAL PLAN OR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS BEAR HIDE RANCH ESTATES CONSIST OF 8.537 ACRES DEVELOPED BY BEAR HIDE, BEAR HIDE RANCH IN ESTATES LLC LOCATED OFF OF PERKINS ROAD WOOD WATER AND PRECINCT TWO.

AND THIS IS GONNA BE A FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION.

THEY ALL RANGE IN SIZE, THEY'RE ALL A LITTLE OVER TWO ACRES IN SIZE, BUT WE DID WAIVE THE GROUNDWATER STUDY, UH, DECEMBER 9TH OF THIS YEAR AND THEY ALSO ARE GOING TO BE DEDICATING ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF PERKINS ROAD.

DID MD GET WITH YOU ON WHERE WE NEED THE 'CAUSE THEY'RE, THEY'RE LOOKING AT DOING A SPECIAL KIND OF ENTRANCE FOR THE MIDDLE TWO LOTS DUE TO A HILL FOR LINE OF SIGHT.

WE MET WITH THEM.

DID MD TALK WITH YOU ABOUT THAT? PUT IN A, IT'S LIKE HALF HALF CUL-DE-SAC BASICALLY I BASICALLY WHAT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS MAKE SURE THAT THAT PROPERTY LINE IS, COMES OUT AT THE TOP OF THE HILL SO THEY MIGHT END UP ADJUSTING THEIR SURVEY JUST A LITTLE BIT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE VISIBILITY IS PROPER.

SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS SUBJECT TO THE MIDDLE PROPERTY PROPERTY LINE BEING AT THE TOP OF THE HILL SO THEY CAN DO THE, IT'S A QUASI COMBINED ENTRANCE.

I REMEMBER NOW.

I WE'D HAVE TO PROVE TODAY WHAT THEY, THEY SUBMITTED AND DO A REVISION BEFORE HE SOLD OFF ON IT.

WE'RE AT FINAL PLAN.

YEAH,

[01:35:01]

THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING.

WE EITHER APPROVE IT, THEY SUBMITTED TODAY, EITHER REVISION OR COME BACK.

LET ME, LEMME CALL HIM REAL QUICK.

CAN I CALL MY PHONE NUMBER REAL QUICK? YES, SURE.

AND UH, WHAT THEY DID WAS A 40 BY HUNDRED FOOT SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT OFF.

ALRIGHT, MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

BILL, MOVE TO ITEM FIVE.

ACCEPT A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED FOR ADDITIONAL LOT RIGHT OF WAY ON PERKINS ROAD IN A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS BEAR HIDE RANCH IN PRECINCT TO THIS IS MOTION MADE AN ADDITIONAL 0.37 NINTH OF AN ACRE OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE FIVE OH ITEM SIX APPROVED THE FINAL PLA FOR SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS HOPE SIDE RV PARK CONSISTING OF 8.62 ACRES DEVELOPED BY SEAN WALKER LOCATED OFF OF PRATHER ROAD WITH WALNUT CREEK SUD IN PRECINCT TWO.

IT'S A COMBINATION OF THREE TRACKS OF LAND TO GET TO THE 8.62 ACRES TO MEET OUR CURRENT AR PARK REGULATIONS.

UH, THEIR ROAD DOES COME OFF OF PRATHER ROAD AND WALNUT CREEK IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE SOURCE.

YES, THE POINT UH, I HAVE CONFIRMED WALNUT CREEK IS THERE.

THEY DO HAVE THE FIRE HYDRANTS.

THIS WAS ACTUALLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO THE RV PARK INFRASTRUCTURE RULES.

HE DID NOT HAVE HIS TCEQ APPROVED SO IT WAS INITIALLY DENIED.

UH, THEY RETAINED COUNSEL AND WE'VE BEEN NEGOTIATING ABOUT FOR ABOUT SIX MONTHS AND YOU KNOW, SO BOTTOM LINE RUSTY, ARE YOU GOOD WITH THE CURRENT STATE THAT, ARE YOU GOOD WITH US APPROVING THIS? YES.

YEAH, HE, HE, HE'S GOT FIRE HYDRANTS AND HE, HE HAS DONE EVERYTHING THAT HE'S BEEN.

GOODBYE COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

OKAY, MOTION MOVE BACK COMMISSIONER.

HOLD SECOND.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? FOLLOW CARRIES FIVE.

MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN.

I'LL RELEASE THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR LAMBERT MEADOWS AND ACCEPT THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE IN PRECINCT TWO.

I DID GET A NEW LETTER OF CREDIT IN PLACE.

WE'RE GONNA HOLD THIS UNTIL SEPTEMBER 23RD, 2026 AND IT IS FOR 7,105 WISH MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

SECOND MAKE COMMISSIONER WALDEN ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM EIGHT.

RELEASE THE LETTER CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR STONE ESTATES BASE TWO AND ACCEPTS SPRUCE TREE COURT.

MESQUITE TREE COURT PECAN TREE COURT AND CEDAR TREE DRIVE IS A COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAYS IN PRECINCT TWO PRECINCT HAS APPROVED THESE ROADS AND WE'D JUST LIKE TO GET THEM ADDED TO OUR COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM.

OKAY, MOTION MOVE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

SECOND, MAKE COMMISSIONER WALDEN FURTHER DISCUSSION.

ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM NINE.

RELEASE THE LATERAL CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR ARBOR HILLS AND EXCEPT ARBOR HILLS COURT AS A COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAY IN PRECINCT TWO PRECINCT HAS APPROVED THE RELEASE OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE, UH, FOR THESE ROADS MOTION MAY BY COMMISSIONER HOL SECOND TO COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES ABOVE VOTE.

MOVE TO ITEM 10, RELEASE THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND ACCEPT THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR ESCONDIDO BRANCHES PHASE TWO AND PRECINCT TWO.

AND I DID RECEIVE A NEW LETTER OF CREDIT AND THIS ONE IS GONNA BE GOOD UNTIL DECEMBER 5TH, 2026 AND IT'S IN THE AMOUNT OF 29,953.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM 11 RELEASE OF 3.06 ACRES DEVELOPED BY THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD ETJ LOCATED OFF OF MCFARLAND LANE IN PRECINCT TWO.

WE DID RECEIVE A CONFIRMATION FROM THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD THAT THIS LAND HAS BEEN RELEASED.

WE'D JUST LIKE TO GET THAT NOTED MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER

[01:40:01]

WALDEN.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM 12 AND DISCUSS ENACT ON THE RELEASE OF TAKING OF THE MAINTENANCE ESCROW FUNDS PER ROAD CONSTRUCTION FOR CLAREMONT PHASE TWO AND TAKE ANY ACTION OF THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY.

AND WE DID SEND OUT, UH, NOTICE TO UH, THE COUNSEL ON THIS PROJECT BACK IN NOVEMBER THAT THESE ROADS WERE NOT UP TO COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND TO GET IN CONTACT WITH US TO MAKE OTHER ARRANGEMENTS.

AND AS OF TODAY WE HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING EITHER IN WRITING OR VIA EMAIL FROM MR. FRAZIER OR HIS ATTORNEY.

SO THIS BOND IS SET TO EXPIRE JANUARY 9TH SO WE DON'T COME BACK TO COURT PRIOR TO THAT DATE.

SO I'D LIKE TO REQUEST THAT WE PULL THIS IS $5,997 AND 74 CENTS WORTH OF, UM, BOND LEFT ON THIS PROJECT.

SO APPROXIMATELY 6,000? YES.

YOU SAID JANUARY 9TH AND WE HAVE OUR DUCKS IN A ROW.

WE'RE GOOD.

COUNSEL, UH, WE'LL PROCEED ON THAT IF Y'ALL WOULD LIKE TO PULL THAT.

I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE PULL THIS MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? JUST FOR THE SAKE OF CLARIFYING.

SO I'M USING THE RIGHT LANGUAGE HERE THAT WE TAKE THE FUNDS FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION COUNSELORS AT ADEQUATE .

YOU ACTUALLY CALLED CALL CALL THE BOND THAT WE CALL THE BOND.

THAT'S MY MOTION.

ALL ALL.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION JOHN INPUT? YES SIR.

CURIOUS IF I A VOTE ITEM 13, RELEASE A LETTER OF CREDIT FOR CONSTRUCTION PERSON TO STATE PAGE FOUR AND ACCEPTED A LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE IN PRECINCT TWO.

WE DO HAVE, UH, A BOND IN PLACE FOR THIS.

WE'D JUST LIKE TO RELEASE THE CONSTRUCTION.

ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOL SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM 14 RELEASE A LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR GATLIN RANCHING EXCEPT GATLIN CIRCLE.

WILLY DILLEY ROAD IN TIER CIRCLE IS A COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAY IN PRECINCT TWO PRECINCT , THESE ROADS AND WE LOVE TO GET THEM ADDED COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM.

AND JAMIE, YOU NAMED ALL THREE OF THESE RIGHT? ABSOLUTELY.

THAT'S WHY IT SAYS TIER CIRCLE.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY MOTION? MOVE BY COMMISSIONER HALL.

ANY THOSE GOOD WAS YOURS AS WELL? ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM

[11.C. PRECINCT 3 ]

C PRECINCT THREE.

ITEM ONE APPROVED A WAIVER FOR GROUNDWATER STUDY FOR MOORE WATER.

WELL FOR A SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS WDW ADDITION AND PRECINCT THREE.

AND THIS IS A, UH, TWO LOT SUBDIVISION THAT A PURPOSE OF THIS.

IT'S CURRENTLY UH, TWO TRACKS OF LAND.

THEY ARE MOVING A LOT LINE ON THIS.

SO THEY PULLED ONE OF THE WELL REPORTS FOR THIS AND IT'S PUTTING OUT A YIELD OF 10 GM AT A P PUMP DEBT.

WE HAVE A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND IT.

UM, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIED FIVE OH ITEM TWO BEGIN THE PRELIMINARY FOR SUBDIVISION.

BE KNOWN AS WDW EDITION.

THIS IS UH, LOT ONE.

WELL I'M, LET ME FINISH.

I'M SORRY.

CONSISTENT OF, I HAD TO TURN THE PAGE CONSISTENT OF 4.33 ACRES OF BELLA BY WILLIAM DALE WALKER LOCATED OFF OF 10 DOPP THE STATES ROAD WITH AN EXISTING WATER WELL AND PRECINCT THREE.

SORRY TWO LOT SUBDIVISION.

THEY ARE MOVING A LOT LINE ON LOT ONE AND TWO.

UM, SO THE NEW CHANGES IS GONNA BE LOT.

ONE IS GONNA HAVE TWO ACRES AND LOT TWO IS GONNA HAVE 2.33 ACRES.

UH, THEY DO HAVE OUT THE STATES AND WELL WATER.

WATER SOURCE IS EVERYTHING IN PLACE? EVERYTHING IN PLACE.

MOVE TO APPROVE MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

MOTION CARRIES FIVE OH ITEM THREE, APPROVE THE VARIANCE FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY AND DRIVEWAY DISTANCES FOR WESTERN LAKE DRIVE WITH WESTERN LAKE ESTATES.

LOT 35 AND THE SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS WESTERN LAKE ESTATES AND PRECINCT THREE.

SO THESE TWO LOTS HAVE BEEN, UH, OUT THERE SINCE WESTERN LAKE WAS PUT IN PLACE.

THEY'RE CURRENTLY SITTING AT, UM, THE TOTAL FOR BOTH LOTS IS 256 FEET.

SO THEY'RE EACH CURRENTLY AT ONE 17 AND 1 39.

AND REGULATIONS AND PARKER COUNTY OS OF RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR LOT 35 R DASH ONE IN A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS WESTERN LAKE ESTATES AND PRECINCT THREE.

A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT DURING THE DISCUSSION.

ALL IN FAVOR CARRIE? FIVE OH ITEM FOUR, APPROVE THE VARIANCE FOR PARKER COUNTY SUBDIVISION RULES

[01:45:01]

SO THESE TWO LOT, LOT 35 R ONE IS GONNA HAVE 0.888 OF AN ACRE AND 35 R TWO IS 1.513 OF AN ACRE.

UM, WE STARTED THIS PROCESS BACK IN FEBRUARY THIS YEAR AND DUE TO SOME ISSUES WE'VE HAD TO POSTPONE IT.

UH, WE DID TALK ABOUT WAIVING THESE UH, BACK IN FEBRUARY, UM, BEFORE WE CAME.

THE FINAL, I GUESS RUSTY HAS BOTH THOUGHTS WILL SUSTAIN , ALTHOUGH WITH I WASN'T REAL SURE UNTIL FRIDAY, YOU KNOW WHEN THESE LITTLE LOTS GOING BIGGER OR WAS A BIG LOT GOING SMALLER.

MM-HMM .

SO, AND THE OWNER IS HERE IF Y'ALL LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THE PURPOSE IS.

I THINK YOU'VE ALREADY TOLD US.

WE'RE GOOD.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH.

ITEM FIVE.

APPROVE THE FINAL VERSION REVISION FOR A SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS WESTERN LAKE ESTATES.

CONSISTENT OF 2.401 ACRES DEVELOPED BY BENJAMIN JOHNSON AND JAMES AND AMANDA WILLIAMS LOCATED OFF OF WESTERN LAKE ESTATES AND SOUTHWEST WATER IN PRECINCT THREE.

IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

WE DID SEND OUT 27 CERTIFIED LETTERS AND RAN ADS IN THE PAPER.

AS PER THE STATUTE WE'VE KIND OF TALKED ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE, SO, OKAY, WE'LL OPEN PUBLIC HEARING AT 1240.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ON ITEM FIVE HERE? NINE.

WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1240 AND GO TO THE, GO TO THE, UH, AGENDA ITEM IS EVERYTHING IN PLACE FOR THE FINAL REVISION.

PROPER NOTICE WAS PLACE A NEWSPAPER LISTING TO DATE, TIME, LOCATION, PURPOSE OF TODAY'S HEARING, THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATING A BALANCE OF $4,689 AND 66 CENTS.

PERMITTING HAS APPROVED PUBLIC WATER AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL AND THEY HAVE MET ALL OF THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

OKAY, MOTION ARE MADE BY COMMISSIONER WAL AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT.

MOTION CARRIES BY VOTE.

MOVE TO ITEM SIX.

I'LL BEGIN THE REVISION FOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS ELEVATION ESTATE PHASE TWO CONSISTENT OF 2.14 ACRES DEVELOPED BY JAY EVERETT.

CUSTOM HOMES LLC AND CT THREE.

INVESTMENTS IN HOMES LLC LOCATED OFF OF INFINITY DRIVE AND DOWN SLOPE LANE WITH TEXAS WATER UTILITIES, LP AND PRECINCT THREE.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVISION IS TO CHANGE THE LOT LINE ON LOT 28 AND 29.

IT'S GONNA LEAD THEM WITH 1.1 ACRE ON LOT 28 AND 1.04 ACRES ON LOT 29.

WE'D JUST LIKE TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.

IS EVERYTHING IN PLACE? YES.

MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH.

MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN.

BEGIN THE ABANDONMENT PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS COUGAR MEADOWS AND TAKE ANY ACTION OF THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY.

THIS SUBDIVISION WAS 106.6 ACRES OF LAND.

UM, AS YOU KNOW, THEY WERE UNSUCCESSFUL WHEN DRILLING THEIR WELLS, SO THEY'D LIKE TO.

WE DO ALSO HAVE A LETTER OF CREDIT IN PLACE FOR THEM.

UH, WE'D LIKE TO BEGIN THE ABANDONMENT PROCESS TO CANCEL THIS SUBDIVISION.

I THINK THEY'RE GONNA COME BACK IN AND DIVIDE IT INTO THREE LARGE TRACKS OF LAND.

UM, BUT WE'D JUST LIKE TO GET PERMISSION TO START SO THAT WE CAN, UM, GET RID OF THAT LETTER OF CREDIT FOR THEM AS WELL.

CARRIES FIVE OH.

MOVE TO ITEM

[11.D. PRECINCT 4 (Part 2 of 2)]

D PRECINCT FOUR.

ITEM ONE.

BEGIN THE REVISION FOR A SUBDIVISION.

BE KNOWN AS LAKERIDGE RANCHES IN THE ETJ CITY OF FORT WORTH.

CONSISTENT OF 113.39 ACRES DEVELOPED BY JRM LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY LLC LOCATED OFF OF WATT SETTLEMENT ROAD OF WALL WATER AND PRECINCT FOUR MS. WEST REALLY FROM THE CITY OF FORT WORTH.

UH, THIS IS GONNA BE 44 ACRES.

44 LOTS.

THEY ARE GONNA RANGE IN SIZE FROM 2.05 ACRES TO 4.38 ACRES.

UH, NONE OF THESE LOTS ARE GONNA HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE COMING OFF OF WHITE SETTLEMENT ROADS.

ALL THEIR ROAD FURNISH IS GONNA BE FROM INTERIOR LOTS.

UM, AND, UH, I'M SORRY.

WELL WATER IS GONNA BE THEIR WATER SOURCE.

THEY ARE ALSO GONNA BE PUTTING IN THREE ROADS THAT WILL BE COUNTY MAINTAINED ROAD.

WE JUST LIKE TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS TO GET THIS REDONE.

WE HAVE EVERYTHING TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS.

WE HAVE EVERYTHING IN ORDER.

IN PRECINCT FOUR IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

MOTION WILL BE BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH.

MOVE TO ITEM THREE.

APPROVE THE PROCESS OF POSTING A FOUR-WAY STOP SIGN AT BEAR CREEK RIDGE HILL DRIVE AND SCENIC VIEW DRIVE

[01:50:01]

I DID RECEIVE A PETITION, UH, REQUESTING THIS CHANGE AND I RAN ADS IN THE PAPER AS PER THE STATUTE.

OKAY, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1244.

IS EVERYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM 3D, PRECINCT FOUR? IT IS 1244.

IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING HERE ON C NINE.

WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1244 AND GO TO THE ITEM MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY.

MOTION MADE BY, I'M SORRY.

UM, MOTION PASSES.

FIVE OH.

WE WILL GO TO ITEM FOUR.

WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION.

WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM FIVE.

WE'LL REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE ADDENDUM WITH THE TOWN OF BENETTA NORTH FOR ROAD REPAIR SERVICES AND PRECINCT FOUR.

AND THIS ADDENDUM IS FOR, UH, ROAD WORK DONE ON QUAIL RIDGE AND IT'S IN THE AMOUNT OF $58,000.

AND I HAVE THAT UP THERE FOR YOU TO SIGN.

I'VE SIGNED IT.

MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE.

AN AGENDA ITEM ON ITEM EIGHT C, APPROVAL OF THE CREATION OF THE REINVESTMENT ZONE 20 24 0 3 THAT CHRIS TRAYER, UH, SPOKE ON AND ON THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CREATION OF THAT REINVESTMENT ZONE, UH, THAT WE DID AND APPROVED.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? MOTION PASSES.

FIVE OH.

UH, THERE IS AN ITEM THAT WE OVERLOOKED.

[8.C. Approval of the creation of the reinvestment zone 2024-03. (Chris Strayer / Judge Deen) ]

UH, WITH THIS IS ITEM C.

UH, OBVIOUSLY HE'S LEFT, BUT, UH, WE CAN EITHER BRING HIM BACK AND HAVE HIM COME BACK.

BUT WE DID GO THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THAT AND THIS WAS JUST THE FOLLOW UP ON THE APPROVAL OF THAT AND REINVESTMENT ZONE.

WE DID NOT DO THAT ONE.

I THOUGHT WE APPROVED IT.

UH, I THOUGHT WE DID TOO.

EIGHT C.

IT IS THE ONE IN PRECINCT FOUR.

THOSE SHOULD BE COMBINED.

IT SAYS PUBLIC HEARING SO IT SHOWED UP.

Y HAD A PUBLIC HEARING.

WE HAD A PUBLIC HEARING.

YOU CAME OUTTA THE PUBLIC HEARING.

DID Y'ALL VOTE AT THAT POINT? IF Y'ALL DID THAT? WE VOTE, WE VOTED FOR THE, WE WE CAME OUTTA PUBLIC HEARING AND VOTED FOR IT.

SO IT'S THE SAME ITEM AS AS B.

ALRIGHT THEN WE'RE COVERED ON THAT.

WE'RE GOOD.

ALRIGHT.

I WOULD ASK FOR MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT.

MOTION TO THE ADJOURN.