* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:03] I'D [Call to Order] LIKE TO WELCOME EVERYONE TO THE PARKER COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT, AND I WANNA CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER ON THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. LET THE RECORD SHOW IT IS 9 0 1. WE WILL HAVE, DO, HAVE A QUORUM AS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AND MEMBERS OF THE COURT PRESENT. UH, MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND THE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ARE ALSO PRESENT. WE WILL BEGIN WITH AN INVOCATION LED BY MARK JULIAN FROM NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE, LED BY PARKER COUNTY, JUDGE PROAM. COMMISSIONER CONWAY, PLEASE STAND, LET'S PRAY. HEAVENLY FATHER, GOD, WE COME TO YOU THIS HOLY WEEK. WHAT AN OPPORTUNITY, GOD FOR US TO RECOGNIZE AND PRAISE YOU BECAUSE OF ALL THAT YOU'VE DONE, CERTAINLY THROUGH YOUR SON JESUS THAT GIVES US LIFE AND LIFE FOREVER. GOD, WE HAVE TO TRUST YOU. AND MAY GOD WE HONOR YOU THIS WEEK WITH EVERYTHING THAT'S SAID AND DONE FOR THIS COURT AND WHAT IT MEANS TO US. I PRAY FOR OUR COUNTY, GOD, THAT YOU WOULD HELP US MAKE THE RIGHT DECISIONS FOR IT. AND FOR THOSE THAT ARE LIVING HERE, MAY WE, WE JUST SIMPLY BE THANKFUL. WE GIVE YOU ALL THE PRAISE AND THANKS IN JESUS' NAME. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED SAINTS OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I LEADING TWO DEEP TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE INDIVIDUAL. MOVE TO THE ITEM [4. CONSENT] FOUR ON THE CONSENT AGENDA UNDER ITEM A AUDITOR, ITEMS ONE THROUGH FOUR, ITEM B ON THE TREASURER ITEMS ONE AND THREE, AND THEN ITEMS C, COUNTY JUDGE ITEMS ONE THROUGH AND THREE. I'D ASK FOR A MOTION. JUDGE, I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT ITEMS PRESENTED TO COURT TODAY. MOTION I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS, UM, UNDER FOUR, THREE PAYMENT OR ROUTINE BILLS. THERE'S A COUPLE ITEMS THAT I WOULD LIKE FURTHER ACTION FROM THE COURT ON. UM, THE FIRST ONE THERE WAS AN INVOICE TURNED IN FROM SPI ASPHALT, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF 119,730, UM, RELATED TO THE ZION HILL LOOP ROAD PROJECT. UM, MY OFFICE WAS INFORMED THIS MORNING THAT ALL SERVICES HAD NOT BEEN COMPLETED ON THIS, UM, AND IT WAS TURNED IN. SO I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT WE REMOVE THIS, UM, AS THOSE SERVICES HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED, UM, FULLY FOR WHAT IS BEING INVOICED. SO, UM, JUST AS A REMINDER, ANYTIME ANYTHING IS TURNED INTO THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE, UM, ALL SERVICES OR GOODS, UM, RECEIVED THAT WE'RE BEING INVOICED FOR SHOULD BE RECEIVED OR SERVICES, UM, PERFORMED. WE DO RELY ON ALL THE BACKUP DOCUMENTATION AS WELL AS THE SIGNATURE ON THE PO THAT, UM, THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL IS CERTIFYING THAT, UH, SERVICES HAS BEEN PERFORMED AND GOODS RECEIVED. BRIAN, HONOR, REAL QUICK QUESTION ON THAT ONE. MM-HMM . UH, DID DUSTIN TALK TO YOU ABOUT THAT? UH, I BELIEVE KIM WAS NOTIFIED THIS MORNING. I'M SAYING AHEAD OF TIME, LIKE LAST WEEK. DID HE, 'CAUSE HE HAD WALKED ME THROUGH THE PLAN WHERE THE, THE CONTRACTOR WANTED TO BE PAID AS SOON AS THE WORK WAS DONE. AND SO WHAT HE HAD PROMISED WAS HE WOULD GET THE WORK DONE. SO WE SAID WE WOULD FLAG IT, GIVE IT TO Y'ALL, AND THEN CONFIRM BEFORE IT CAME THROUGH COURT THAT IT WAS NOT DONE, THAT IT WAS DONE OR NOT DONE. SO IF IT HAS NOT BEEN DONE, WE DO NOT PAY IT. RIGHT. AND I WAS NOT INFORMED OF THAT PREVIOUSLY. UM, ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION SIGNATURES, I MEAN, IT LOOKED LIKE EVERYTHING HAD BEEN. AND SO I KNOW THIS HAS COME UP BEFORE, BUT WE CANNOT AUDIT A CLAIM UNLESS IT'S BEEN COMPLETED. AND SO, UM, AGAIN, IF IT'S SOMETHING AHEAD OF TIME WHERE WE'RE FINALIZING PAYABLES, THEN WE'RE TOLD, NO, IT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, THEN WE WON'T ENTER IT. BUT BECAUSE IT HAD ALREADY BEEN, YOU KNOW, GONE THROUGH THE AUDIT PROCESS, AND LIKE I SAID, ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION WAS SIGNED OFF AS IT HAD BEEN COMPLETED. AND WE ARE JUST INFORMED THIS MORNING. YEAH, THIS SHOULD NOT BE PAID YET. OKAY. SO, UM, WE WILL, UH, I, I CAN YEAH, PLEASE DO. YEAH. THE, THE, THE TIMING THERE IS SINCE THAT'S THE CTF REIMBURSEMENT. YES. UM, YOU KNOW, WE WERE, WE WERE GETTING THAT WITH ANTICIPATION. THE CONTRACT WAS GONNA BE DONE LAST WEEK, AND NOW THERE'S GONNA BE DONE IN NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS. SO WE'LL NEED TO BE ON NEXT COURT. YEAH. SO APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. YEAH, NO, NO WORRIES. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT FRIES AND NICHOLS HAD DISCUSSED WITH ME AHEAD OF TIME, THAT IT WOULD BE FLAGGED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DID NOT PAY IT IF THE WORK HAD NOT BEEN DONE. OKAY. UM, SO AGAIN, IT WAS INCLUDED IN ALL OF THIS. SO WE WILL NOT, WE WILL VOID THAT CHECK AND THEN IT WILL BE SUBMITTED AT THE NEXT COURT. PERFECT. IF ALL WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED. OKAY. UM, THE OTHER ITEM IS THERE WERE SOME INVOICES FOR PURCHASES FROM THE TEXAS FACILITIES COMMISSION FEDERAL SURPLUS [00:05:01] PROPERTY PROGRAM. ANYTIME THAT, UM, PROPERTY IS RECEIVED FROM THIS, UM, IT IS BASICALLY THE PROGRAM CONSTITUTES AN ACCEPTANCE OF FEDERAL ASSISTANT AWARD, WHICH IS SUBJECT TO SINGLE AUDIT. UM, AND SO BECAUSE WE ARE ACCEPTING PROPERTY UNDER THIS PROGRAM, UM, IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO INCLUDE IN OUR FEDERAL GRANT AWARDS. UM, SO I WOULD LIKE THE COURT TO, UM, ACCEPT THESE FEDERAL FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF 70,000 155 16. AND THEN GOING FORWARD, WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS THAT THE COURT SIGN A RESOLUTION, UM, GIVING AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE PROPERTY FROM THIS PROGRAM, AND THEN THE, UM, SUBSEQUENT, UH, ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE FEDERAL AWARDS JUST TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE IN COMPLIANCE, UM, FOR SINGLE AUDIT PURPOSES. OKAY. I'M THINKING THAT WE HAVE THE COUNTY JUDGE SIGN A DOCUMENT EACH YEAR PRIOR ANNUAL, RIGHT. SO DO THE RESOLUTION, AND THEN WHEN WE ACTUALLY PURCHASE IT, UM, ON THE INVOICE THAT ACTUALLY SAYS, UM, YOU KNOW, ACCEPTANCE OF THIS IS ACCEPTING, YOU KNOW, FEDERAL WORD ASSISTANCE. SO WE'LL HAVE THE JUDGE SIGN THE ACTUAL INVOICE THAT GOES WITH THE PO FOR THAT. UM, BECAUSE THE INVOICE ALSO, UM, HAS ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF FEDERAL GRANTS, UM, YOU KNOW, IF UPON DISPOSITION OF THAT PROPERTY OR ANYTHING OTHERWISE, UM, THAT THEY'RE STIPULATING AS RECEIVING FEDERAL, UH, PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE TO ABIDE BY. SO WE SIGN A DOCUMENT FROM THEM, UH, EACH TIME THAT WE, WE PURCHASED SOMETHING FROM TEXAS FACILITIES COMMISSION THAT TELLS THEM THAT WE WILL FOLLOW THEIR RULES AND GUIDELINES AND THAT WE WILL BE, UH, IN COMPLIANCE. AND THEY DO CHECK THAT TOO, BY THE WAY. YES. SO THAT IS CORRECT. UM, BUT I, I THINK WE SHOULD GOING FORWARD, HAVE THE COUNTY JUDGE SIGN THAT AS THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL, AND THEN JUST DO A RESOLUTION AT THE BEGINNING GIVING US THAT AUTHORIZATION BEFORE THOSE PURCHASES. 'CAUSE THE REASON I'M QUESTIONING THAT IS BECAUSE THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM ANYTHING THAT I'VE DONE PREVIOUSLY. WE'VE, WE'VE NOT DONE THAT BEFORE. AND I, I, I MAY BE THE ONLY ONE THAT PURCHASED THINGS FROM YES, I THINK IT WAS ACTUALLY BACK IN, UM, FISCAL YEAR 23. AND SO WE RECEIVED A FED A SINGLE AUDIT, UM, LETTER FROM THEM BASICALLY STATING, HERE'S THE AMOUNT OF FAIR MARKET VALUE, UM, THAT WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE, UM, FOR FINANCIAL PURPOSES IN SINGLE AUDIT. AND SO, UM, WHEN I WAS REVIEWING ON FRIDAY, UM, PAYABLES, I HAD NOTICED THAT WE HAD MADE A PURCHASE FROM THEM. SO I PULLED UP, UM, THE BACKUP AND THE INVOICES, UM, BASICALLY HAS ALL THOSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. AND THEN I DID THE CALCULATION, UM, IT'S A CERTAIN CALCULATION OF WHATEVER THE GOVERNMENT ACQUISITION COST WAS TO GET THAT $70,000. SO IT'S NOT $70,000. THAT'S THE VALUE OF IT WHEN CORRECT. UM, I WANT TO SAY THE, THE ACTUAL AMOUNT IS MUCH LESS THAN THAT. YES. UM, SO THEY BASICALLY SHOW IT AS A HANDLING FEE. SO WE PAID 23,700, UM, THE GOVERNMENT ACQUISITION COST IS 300,579. AND THEN THE AMOUNT THAT WE REPORT, UM, AS ACCEPTANCE OF FEDERAL AWARD IS 70,000 155 16. OKAY. OKAY. THE RECORD SHOW ON THESE, ON THE MOTION AND THE SECOND, UH, IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIES FIVE OH, WE'RE GONNA MOVE DOWN TO ITEM SEVEN [7.A. Approve Resolution 25-13 recognizing the City of Weatherford and honoring their achievement of receiving the prestigious Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Triple Crown Award. (Judge Deen)] A ON THE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 25 DASH 13, RECOGNIZING THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD AND HONORING THEIR ACHIEVEMENT OF RECEIVING THE PRESTIGIOUS GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, GFOA TRIPLE CROWN AWARD. WE DO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THEM. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT THE MAYOR, UH, DISTINGUISHED MAYOR PASCAL AND THEIR CITY MANAGER ALSO COME UP. THANK YOU, JUDGE. MEMBERS OF THE COURT , THANK YOU, JUDGE. MEMBERS OF THE COURT. YOU KNOW, WE'VE, WE'VE GOT A LOT OF GREAT EMPLOYEES THAT DO A LOT OF GREAT THINGS FOR THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD. BUT ONE OF THE THINGS WE THINK IS PROBABLY THE MOST IMPORTANT THING WE CAN DO, AND I KNOW THE COURT AGREES WITH THIS 'CAUSE Y'ALL HAVE THE SAME STANDARDS, FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY, YOU KNOW, PAUL PASCAL'S, OUR MAYOR AND OUR CITY COUNCIL, PUT THAT AS ONE OF THE UTMOST UH, PRIORITIES FOR THE CITY STAFF. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE FEEL DEEPLY RESPONSIBLE ABOUT EACH AND EVERY DAY TO OUR TAXPAYERS, JUST LIKE YOU DO. UH, THE WARD THAT YOU'RE HERE TO RECOGNIZE US FOR HERE TODAY, JUDGE, REALLY DOESN'T FALL ON ME. IT REALLY FALLS ON ALL THE, UH, FOLKS THAT WE HAVE IN OUR FINANCE DEPARTMENT LED BY MS. DON BROOKS, WHO'S OUR CFO, AND I'LL LET YOU LET HER BRIEFLY, UH, TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE WARD. BUT THAT WARD IS HONESTLY SOMETHING THOUGH THAT, UM, WE, WE SEE AS THE MINIMUM STANDARD FOR FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY. AND I THINK WHEN YOU SET THAT AS A MINIMUM STANDARD, UH, THEN TAXPAYERS KNOW THAT THEIR TAXPAYER DOLLARS ARE BEING USED WISELY. AND, AND THAT IS AS ALL AS PUBLIC SERVANTS IS ONE OF THE GREATEST THINGS THAT WE'RE ENTRUSTED WITH. AND THAT'S, THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE OBVIOUSLY HOLD THE UTMOST RESPONSIBILITY FOR. SO, DOC, GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING, JUDGE COMMISSIONERS, UM, DON BROOK, CFO OF THE CITY. I JUST WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR RECOGNIZING [00:10:01] OUR DEPARTMENT FOR THIS, UH, THIS VARIOUS PRESTIGIOUS AWARD. UH, THERE ARE ONLY ABOUT 33 ENTITIES IN THE GOVERNMENT, ENTITIES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS WHO RECEIVED THIS. AND IT'S, UH, MADE UP OF PRODUCING THREE DIFFERENT REPORTS. FIRST IS THE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT, WHICH WE'VE RECEIVED FOR, UM, ABOUT 35 YEARS NOW. UM, THE NEXT IS THE, UH, THE BUDGET, THE DISTINGUISHED BUDGET AWARD, WHICH, UH, WE, WE'VE RECEIVED THAT AWARD FOR ABOUT 14 YEARS. AND THEN THREE YEARS AGO, WE ADDED IN THE THIRD REPORT, WHICH IS WHERE THE TRIPLE CROWN COMES FROM, UM, CALLED THE POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. AND THAT'S MORE OF LIKE A READER'S DIGEST OF THE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE, THE ACT FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT. AND IT'S, UH, JUST A REAL QUICK SUMMARY, UM, THAT THE PUBLIC CAN EASILY UNDERSTAND ON WHERE THE CITY'S FINANCES, UM, WHAT WE SPEND OUR MONEY ON, WHERE IT COMES IN FROM AND, AND ALL THAT FUN STUFF. WHAT, HOW MUCH DEBT, HOW MANY ASSETS, ALL OF THAT. SO, UM, THANK YOU FOR YOUR RECOGNITION. UM, WE HAVE A PHENOMENAL TEAM, UH, BACK AT CITY HALL, UH, RACHEL VINEYARD, ASHLEY ESQUIVEL, HANNAH SEYMOUR, UM, WHO ARE, UH, AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS PROCESS. MAYOR PASCAL, WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE SAY A FEW WORDS? WELL, I JUST WANNA PRAISE OUR CITY MANAGER, WHO'S OUR CEO AND OUR CFO, UH, IS THE MAYOR AND, AND OUR COUNCIL TEAM, WE'RE JUST ALONG FOR THE RIDE AND, AND GET TO STAND IN THE, THE BRIGHT, SHINY, UH, EXCITING LIGHT OF WINNING THE AWARD. THE STAFF IS WHAT MAKES THIS POSSIBLE AND WHAT MANAGES THE DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES OF THE CITY. AND WE'RE JUST FEEL REAL FORTUNATE TO HAVE JAMES OP AND HIS EXECUTIVE TEAM. IT'S A REAL BLESSING, NOT ONLY TO US, BUT IN THE PARTNERSHIP WE HAVE WITH PARKER COUNTY AND OTHER ENTITIES IN PARKER COUNTY. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING US TODAY. THANK YOU. WE'D LOVE TO HAVE A PHOTO JUDGE IF, IF THE COURT COULD OH, WE WILL, COULD DO THAT WITH, OKAY, GREAT. YEAH. SO, NOT YET, NOT HOLD ON. STEADY, STEADY . WE'RE, WE'RE GONNA, WE'RE GONNA, UM, YOU GET TO BE MY AGE. YOU DON'T WIN MANY AWARDS THESE DAYS. YOU WANNA DOCUMENT THINGS, WE'RE GONNA APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. AND, UM, UH, I WOULD LIKE TO READ IT AND THEN, UH, HAVE Y'ALL COME UP, SIR. AND SO IF YOU WOULD JUST, IF YOU DON'T MIND JUST STAYING RIGHT THERE. 'CAUSE YOU'RE NOT, DO YOU, IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE YOU HAVE HERE, UH, FROM WEATHERFORD? NO, THAT'S IT. OKAY. YEAH. NOT THAT IT'S NOT ENOUGH, BUT, UH, WE DO HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HA. UH, FOR THE PROCLAMATION. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIES FIVE. OH. UM, BEFORE I READ THIS, I WANT, I WANT TO SAY A COUPLE THINGS THAT'S NOT IN THIS REPORT BECAUSE YOU'RE HERE FOR THE RECOGNITION IN THIS ACHIEVEMENT, BUT THE LEADERSHIP AND, AND, AND, AND MAYOR PASCAL, YOU TALK ABOUT, YOU'RE ALONG FOR THE RIDE. UM, UH, I'LL TAKE IT A LITTLE BIT FURTHER THAN THAT, THAT I DON'T BELIEVE. AND, AND I THINK WITH THE COMPETENCY OF, WITH DON AND, AND YOUR CFO AND, UM, THESE THINGS WOULD, WOULD LIKELY HAPPEN. BUT IT'S YOUR LEADERSHIP THAT HAS RESULTED IN TRICKLES INTO THE ORGANIZATION, UH, THAT HAS BEEN VERY PREVALENT. AND, UH, WE RECOGNIZE THAT. AND THE RELATIONSHIP THAT WE HAVE WITH THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD MEANS A GREAT DEAL TO US. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. THE RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENT AND THE RESOLUTION ON THE 25 13 CITY OF WEATHERFORD, WHERE AS THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD HAS NOW BEEN HONORED FOR THE PAST THREE CONSECUTIVE YEARS WITH THE PRESTIGIOUS GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF TRIPLE CROWN AWARD. AND WHEREAS THE DISTINGUISHED RECOGNITION REPRESENTS THE PINNACLE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE REPORTING, PLACING THE CITY OF WEATHERFORD IN THEIR FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AND A TRULY ELITE CATEGORY FOR FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY. WHEREAS JUST 33 GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES IN TEXAS, AND ONLY ONE TO 2% OF APPROXIMATELY 90,000 GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES NATIONWIDE RECEIVED THIS HONOR. WHEREAS THE GFOA TRIPLE CROWN AWARD RECOGNIZES THE EXCELLENCE ACROSS THREE DISTINCT FINANCIAL REPORTING CATEGORIES, WHICH NUMBER ONE, ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT, A THOROUGH AND DETAILED ACCOUNTING OF THE CITY'S FINANCIAL POSITION AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. NUMBER TWO, POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT, A SIMPLIFIED FINANCIAL REPORT DESIGNATED TO COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO RESIDENTS IN AN ACCESSIBLE USER-FRIENDLY FORMAT. AND NUMBER THREE, DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION. IT'S A RECOGNITION FOR A BUDGET DOCUMENT THAT SERVES AS A POLICY DOCUMENT, FINANCIAL PLAN, OPERATIONS GUIDE, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE. AND NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION'S COUNTY, THE COURT OF THE COUNTY OF PARKER COUNTY RECOGNIZED AND CONGRATULATE THE CITY OF WEATHER FOR THIS ENORMOUS ACCOMPLISHMENT, THEIR AWARD-WINNING RESULTS AND ITS PROVEN OF SUCCESS. SO RECOGNIZE THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. PLEASE GIVE THEM A HAND. PLEASE. COME ON AROUND HERE. [00:15:16] APPRECIATE COMMISSIONER MAYOR. THANKS. SO OUR CHURCH. YEAH. OKAY. I UNDERSTAND THAT OUR, UM, COUNTY ENGINEER HAS A PLOT TO CATCH. I'M GONNA PUNISH YOU FOR THAT. UM, I'M GONNA MOVE HIM UP IN THE AGENDA. WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM FIVE [5.A. Discuss/Take action on ongoing reporting of bond projects to Commissioners Court by Freese & Nichois. (Chris Bosco / Commissioner Holt / Judge Deen)] A UNDER DISCUSSION. TAKE ACTION ON ONGOING REPORTING OF BOND PROJECTS TO COMMISSIONER'S COURT FROM FREEZING THE CHRIS BOSCO WITH FREEZE NICHOLS. UH, SO FIRST ITEM IS THE MONTHLY REPORT FOR APRIL. LET'S SEE. UH, SO A FEW PROGRAM UPDATES. UH, I THINK I PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO Y'ALL THAT THE, THE TIT MOD DID GO THROUGH ON OLD WEATHERFORD ROAD. UH, WE TALKED EARLIER ABOUT THE C TIFF FUNDING. SO THE ZION LOOP, UH, THAT WAS SPOKE ON EARLIER IS THE LAST ITEM. SO, UH, WHEN THE CONTRACTOR COMPLETES THAT WORK IN THE NEXT COUPLE WEEKS, WE'LL BRING THAT, UH, TO COURT, UH, AT THE NEXT COURT AND, AND FINALIZE THAT REIMBURSEMENT FOR THAT PROGRAM. UH, THE VANCE FUNDING AGREEMENTS. UH, SO WE HAVE ONE ON THE COURT TODAY FOR FM FIVE. I'M WORKING ON THREE OTHERS, SO IT'D BE THE 7 30, 11 87, AND I 20. UH, SO THOSE WILL COME IN FUTURE COURTS, BUT TODAY IS THE FM FIVE, UH, ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH TECH STOCK. UH, SO, UH, OVERALL PROGRAM, UH, SO AS YOU KNOW, WE, WE BID, UH, JOHNSON BEND, UH, AND GREEN ACRES AND JAY AND WOODY. SO THOSE HAVE KIND OF MOVED TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, UH, PHASE WE'RE CURRENTLY ADVERTISING RICK WILLIAMSON. UH, THE NEXT, UH, PROJECTS WERE SLATED TO ADVERTISE IN MAY WILL BE, UM, UH, KELLY ROAD SOUTH, UH, MIDWAY ROAD, AND THEN OAK RIDGE. UH, SO THOSE ARE KIND OF THAT, THAT NEXT, UH, BUNCH TO GO, UH, TO BE ADVERTISED. UH, SO HIGHLIGHTS, UH, IN EACH PRECINCT, AS I MENTIONED, UM, WE'RE, WE'RE CURRENTLY, UH, WORKING ON GETTING, UH, MIDWAY ROAD OUT TO BID. UH, EXPECT TO DO THAT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS. UH, WILL BE, UH, LATE APRIL, EARLY MAY ADVERTISEMENT, UH, CHURCH ROAD. WE'RE, UH, IN THE, UH, RIGHT OF WAY NEGOTIATION PHASE AND CONTINUE TO COORDINATE WITH T STOCK AT THE SIGNAL, UH, FOR SEVEN 30 WHERE CHURCH WILL TIE IN, UH, THOMAS ROAD. UH, WE COMPLETED A MARKET STUDY AND WE'LL BRING THAT TO COURT FOR THAT ACQUISITION AT THE NEXT COURT. UH, AND THEN, UH, WE HAD DELIVERED THE PLANS ON THE SIGNAL AT STEWART, UH, FOR, UH, TECH STOCK TO LET THAT JOB IN THE SUMMER. UH, AND THEN BEGINNING SURVEY ON THE VEAL STATION REALIGNMENT THERE AT 51. UM, IN PRECINCT TWO, AS I MENTIONED, UH, WE'RE IN RIGHTAWAY, UH, ACQUISITION ON OAK RIDGE, UM, MAINLY AT THE INTERSECTION OF RED EAGLE, UH, LOOKING TO ADVERTISE THAT PROJECT IN MAY. UH, WE HAVE CONSTRUCTION ACTUALLY BEGINS, UH, HERE IN TWO DAYS ON JOHNSON BEND AND GREEN ACRES, UH, ZION LOOP. UH, AS I MENTIONED THAT WE GOT A COUPLE MORE WEEKS TO WRAP UP THE CONSTRUCTION, UH, AT THAT INTERSECTION. UH, OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE UNDERWAY, UH, FM 51 AND CARTER ROAD, UH, HALF IS WORKING ON SEVEN 30. WE HAVE A MEETING THIS WEEK TALK ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL, BUT THEY'RE IN THAT STUDY PHASE AND LOOKING AT ALIGNMENT OPTIONS FOR, UH, THE SEVEN 30 EXTENSION. UH, WE DID GET, UH, COUNTS, UH, TRAFFIC COUNTS AS PART OF THE PROGRAM FOR POJO ROAD EXTENSION. UH, THE, THE GOAL THERE IS TO KIND OF EVALUATE HOW THE TRAFFIC WOULD ADJUST IN, IN THE COMPLETION OF THAT ROAD. AND, AND LOOKING AT, UM, 1 99 AND, AND 51 THERE, HOW MUCH TRAFFIC WE EXPECT, WE'LL UTILIZE POJO ROAD EXTENSION. UH, IN PRECINCT THREE. UH, WE'RE HAVING RIGHT OF WAY DISCUSSIONS ON, UH, THE EAST [00:20:01] WEST CONNECTOR. UH, WE HAVE RICK WILLIAMSON OUT TO BID WITH THE BID OPENING PLAN FOR APRIL 28TH. UH, TECH STOCKS STILL UNDER REVIEW WITH THE FRONTAGE ROADS AND RAMP, SO THAT WOULD BE A BETHEL. BUT WE'RE ALSO WORKING ON, UH, GRAHAM AND ASSOCIATES WAS A SELECTED FIRM FOR THE FRONTAGE ROADS. UH, AND SO WE'RE WORKING ON THE SCOPE AND FEE FROM THEM TO BRING, UH, FORWARD TO COURT FOR, UH, CONSIDERATION, UH, ACTUALLY TARGETING MAY 12TH FOR THAT, UH, FOR THAT, UH, CONTRACT, UH, IN PRECINCT FOUR. UM, WE ARE WORKING ON RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION. UH, WE'VE KIND OF BROKEN THAT INTO TWO PHASES. LOOKING AT, UH, BIDDING THE PART FROM 1187 TO VERNON AND DEAN. UH, ONE REASON FOR THAT IS WITH THE SCHOOL, WE DIDN'T REALLY WANT THE ENTIRE ROAD BEING UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT ONE TIME. SO WE FEEL LIKE, UH, BREAKING THAT IN PHASES WILL ACCOMMODATE MANAGING TRAFFIC FOR THE BUSINESSES IN THE SCHOOL. UH, ON, UH, BANKHEAD BRIDGE, UH, THAT'S ONE OF THE ITEMS I HAVE FOR COURT TODAY IS APPROVAL OF DESIGN CONTRACT ON THAT PROJECT, UH, OLD WEATHERFORD ROAD. THE TEMPORARY PAVEMENT'S BEEN INSTALLED, UH, AND THE TRAFFIC HAS BEEN SWITCHED FOR THAT PROJECT. UH, 1187 WIDENING, SIMILAR TO SEVEN 30. UH, OL PERKINS IS, IS IN THAT KIND OF EARLY STUDY PHASE, UH, EVEN THOUGH THAT ONE DOESN'T HAVE A LOT OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS, KIND OF LOOKING AT THE ULTIMATE, UH, TYPICAL SECTION FOR THAT SEGMENT ON KELLY ROAD SOUTH. UM, WE'RE ABOUT 90% IN THE PLAN PRODUCTION AND LOOKING TO ADVERTISE THAT ONE IN MAY AS WELL. WE HAVE COMPLETED A WARRANT STUDY. WE'RE LOOKING AT GETTING A SIGNAL INSTALLED AT KELLY ROAD AND 3 77, WHICH IT DID WARRANT, AND WE WILL HAVE THAT TO TECH STOCK THIS WEEK FOR REVIEW. UH, SO WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN IT UP TO ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. OKAY. DO YOU, ANY QUESTIONS? NOT I ASK FOR A MOTION, PLEASE. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OF THE DISCUSSION ON THE SIDE BEFORE WE VOTE? WHAT ARE WE APPROVING? IT'S A DISCUSSION. ACTION. JUST THE REPORT. JUST THE REPORT ITSELF. I TO UPDATE. PERFECT THERE. OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE. OH, THANK YOU, CHRIS. UH, ITEM B, DISCUSS AUTHORIZED [5.B. Discuss/Authorize the County Judge to sign Advance Funding Agreement CCSJ #1469-01-024 with TxDOT regarding FM 5 and Bankhead Hwy intersection. (Chris Bosco / Judge Deen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iscuss/Approve Construction Phase Services for the Johnson Bend Rd. and Green Acres Rd. Realignment project. (Chris Bosco / Judge Deen)] C, DISCUSS APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE JOHNSON BEND ROAD AND GREENACRE ROAD REALIGNMENT PROJECT. UH, SO THIS IS FOR THE INTERSECTION OF JOHNSON BEND AND GREEN ACRES AND PRECINCT TWO. UH, WE'VE ALREADY BID THAT JOB. AND WHAT WE'RE SEEKING APPROVAL FOR HERE WOULD BE THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INSPECTION AND TESTING, UH, FOR THAT PROJECT. UH, LIKE WE'VE DONE IN PAST CONTRACTS WITH CONSTRUCTION, IT'S A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF 125,000, UH, 18. UH, AND THEN, UH, IT'S, IT'S AN HOURLY DEAL. WE'VE ESTIMATED ABOUT, UH, PART-TIME, UH, INSPECTION EFFORT. AND ONE REASON FOR THAT IS, UH, HERE IN THE COMING MONTHS, WE'LL HAVE RICK WILLIAMSON ALSO MIDWAY, SO ALL THREE UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SO OUR INSPECTOR AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CAN, CAN BE DOING MULTIPLE JOBS AT ONCE. OKAY. YOU HAVE THE DISCUSSION, CHRIS. YOU, YOU GOOD? UH, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? [00:25:02] ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIED BY BOTH. MOVE TO ITEM D, DISCUSS, [5.D. Discuss/Take action on FM 5 and Bankhead Intersection Engineering Design Contract. (Chris Bosco / Commissioner Hale)] TAKE ACTION ON FM FIVE AND BAN KIT INTERSECTION ENGINEERING DESIGN CONTRACT. UH, SO THIS IS RELATED TO THE AGREEMENT WITH TECH STOCK. I MENTIONED THAT THE ESTIMATED BUDGET THERE WAS 160,000. UH, WHAT WE'VE INCLUDED IN HERE IS THE DESIGN OF THE INTERSECTION. ONE THING I FAILED TO MENTION, THE, THE SCOPE IS TO HAVE A NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE AND THEN LEFT TURN LANES ON, UH, FM FIVE. TURNING ONTO BANKHEAD, THE, THE IDEAS WITH THE NEW BANKHEAD BRIDGE AND THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BANKHEAD, UH, HEADING TO 1187, THAT THIS ROUTE WILL BE NOT ONLY AN ALTERNATE TO 20, BUT A, A DOMINANT ROUTE TO GET TO ALITO SCHOOLS AND THE PRIVATE SCHOOL. UH, SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT'S DRIVING THIS PROJECT. UH, AS PART OF THAT AGREEMENT WITH TECH STOCK, THE REQUIREMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL, WE HAD SOME SURVEY, UH, WHEN WE WERE DOING A CULVERT EXTENSION AT FM FIVE, WE HAD THAT SURVEY, BUT THIS ADDS THE FULL SURVEY. AND THEN WE'RE ANTICIPATING, UH, RIGHTAWAY ACQUISITION OF, UH, ONE OF THE CORNERS IN ORDER TO GET THE RIGHT TURN LANE IN. OKAY. UH, SO THE MOUNT WOULD BE 1 49, 5 60. WE HAVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE, THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE. OH, MOVE TO [5.E. Discuss/Take action on Bankhead Bridge Engineering Design Contract. (Chris Bosco / Commissioner Hale)] ITEM E. DISCUSS, TAKE ACTION ON BANKHEAD BRIDGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CONTRACT. CHRIS? UH, SO THIS IS THE BANKHEAD BRIDGE PROJECT. UM, WE ARE PARTNERING WITH MBC. THEY'RE A STRUCTURAL FIRM DOING THE BRIDGE PORTION OF THE DESIGN. UH, SO THIS INCLUDE, IT'S REALLY JUST THE SEGMENT. UM, WILLOW PARK IS, UH, GONNA BE DOING THE EXTENSION OF THE ROAD, UH, KIND OF FROM THE BRIDGE, UH, BACK TO THE WEST. UH, SO WHAT THE COUNTY IS PROVIDING IS THE APPROACHES TO WHAT WAS THE OLD BRIDGE CONNECT TO THE, UH, THE ROADWAY THAT'S ALREADY BEEN BUILT ADJACENT TO THE PRIVATE SCHOOL. UH, AND SO THIS INCLUDES THE, THE BRIDGE ENGINEERING, UH, THE CIVIL WORK AROUND THAT, UH, GEOTECHNICAL WORK AND RIGHTAWAY ACQUISITION. UH, THE TOTAL BUDGET FOR THIS PROJECT IS 1 73 700. OKAY. WE DO HAVE THE CITY MANAGER HERE FROM WILLOW PARK. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENT ON THIS AT ALL? OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIES BY VOTE. OKAY. IF, IF YOU WOULD, WE'RE GONNA ADVANCE DOWN THERE. THERE'S ONE OTHER ITEM THAT CHRIS, YOU NEED TO BE HERE FOR, AS I UNDERSTAND. UM, IT IS IN PLAS. IT IS UNDER ITEM [10.B. PRECINCT 2 (Part 1 of 2)] B, PRECINCT TWO, ITEM NINE. CONSIDER DISCUSSING, ACT UPON THE CHANGE OF THE SPEED LIMIT ON RICK WILLIAMSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY IN PRECINCT TWO, AND TAKE ANY ACTION OF THE COURT THEM NECESSARY. IT IS A, IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU WOULD, UH, JUST KIND OF OPEN THAT UP AND WE'LL GO TO A PUBLIC HEARING. JUST A MOMENT. OKAY. UM, SO WE'RE LOOKING AT THE MOST NORTHERN SEGMENT. SO THIS IS WHAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE IS THE SEGMENT OF THE LOOP FROM 51 TO SEVEN 30. UH, AFTER GETTING THE LOOP OPENED, UH, WE'D RECEIVED, YOU KNOW, SEVERAL COMMENTS AROUND, UH, THE SPEED BEING TOO LOW ON THIS SEGMENT. UH, SO THIS IS THE MOST NORTHERN SEGMENT. AND SO, UH, WE CONDUCTED A SPEED STUDY. UH, YOU'LL SEE THERE, IT, UH, LOOKED AT SIX DIFFERENT LOCATIONS AND, AND KIND OF THE PROCESS THERE IS IDENTIFYING, UH, WHAT IS THE 85 PERCENTILE SPEED ON THE ROAD. I'M GONNA KIND OF JUMP TO JUST SHOW YOU A QUICK GRAPH. UH, SO THIS GRAPH SHOWS THAT YOU CAN SEE AT THE 45. IT'S WHAT IT'S POSTED TODAY. UH, WHAT YOU SEE THERE IN BLUE SHOWS THE WESTBOUND DIRECTION. AND THEN, UH, THAT KIND OF GOLDEN COLOR SHOWS THE EASTBOUND DIRECTION. SO, UH, AS THE DATA KIND OF INDICATES, UH, WE FEEL LIKE 55 MILES AN HOUR WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE SPEED FOR THAT SEGMENT. UH, GIVEN THE APPROACH. GOING BACK TO THE EXHIBIT, THE APPROACH INTO THE INTERSECTION AT SEVEN 30, AND THEN THE CURVES ON THE OTHER END, APPROACHING 51, WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHANGE IN SPEED BE WHAT'S SHOWN IN RED FROM JOYCE STREET, UH, TO HILLTOP. UH, IT'S APPROXIMATELY ABOUT THREE MILE SEGMENT THERE. UH, AND SO THAT, THAT'S WHAT, UH, WE WANTED TO BRING FORWARD FOR PUBLIC HEARING IS, IS MAKING THAT SPEED ADJUSTMENT. OKAY. WE'RE GONNA OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 9 31. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM? AND THIS IS ITEM 10 ON THE PLATTING UNDER ITEM B, PRECINCT TWO, [00:30:01] ITEM NINE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? AGAIN, WE'RE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING. JUDGE, WE, UH, IF WE HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. BOSCO, SHOULD WE RAISE IT NOW OR AFTER PUBLIC HEARING? YES. NOW, MR. BOSCO, I'VE GOT A QUESTION FOR YOU. I'VE, I'VE HAD, UH, THIS IS IN MY PRECINCT AND I'VE HAD NUMEROUS AS AN UNDERSTATEMENT REQUESTS TO RAISE THE SPEED LIMIT ON THAT PARTICULAR STRETCH OF ROAD. IT'S VERY EASY TO GO OVER 45. UM, IN GENERAL, UM, I'M IN FAVOR OF IT. I DO HAVE KIND OF A DEVIL'S ADVOCATE TYPE QUESTION. IF WE RAISE THE SPEED LIMIT FROM 45 TO SAY 55, DO WE HAVE ANY DATA ON BEHAVIORAL CHANGES WHERE FOLKS WERE GOING 10 MILES OVER BEFORE NOW THEY'RE GONNA GO 10 MILES OVER AGAIN, NOW THEY'RE ALL GONNA GO 65. LIKE, WHAT DO Y'ALL SEE ON THAT FROM A TRAFFIC PERSPECTIVE? UM, GENERALLY SPEAKING, 'CAUSE THE WAY THAT THE STUDY'S DONE, WE ACTUALLY BAG THE SPEED LIMITS. AND SO DURING THE STUDY TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO DRIVE WHATEVER THEY FEEL COMFORTABLE, UH, SO GENERALLY IT'S A DRIVER COMFORT. UH, YOU KNOW, MEANING AS YOUR, UM, YOU KNOW, LIKE PEOPLE DRIVE ON THE HIGHWAY, YOU, YOU JUST KIND OF HIT A SPEED THAT FEELS COMFORTABLE WITH THE ROAD GEOMETRY. ONE REASON WHY WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO IT ON THE CURVES, 'CAUSE IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A, A SHARPER CURVE AS WE KIND OF NAVIGATED THE DEVELOPMENT IN THAT AREA. SO THAT, THAT'S ONE REASON WHY IT'S DONE AT THE 85 PERCENTILE YOU'RE TRYING TO GET, YOU KNOW, 85% OF THE PEOPLE ARE AT THAT SPEED OR GREATER. AND SO, UH, WE HAVEN'T REALLY SEEN THAT KIND OF CHANGE WHERE PEOPLE WILL PUSH THE LIMIT EVEN FURTHER. IT'S NOT TO SAY THERE AREN'T PEOPLE EXCEEDING 55 TODAY. YOU NEVER, I DO SEE MS. MCCULLOUGH HAS A GUILTY LOOK ON HER FACE. OKAY. , YOU'VE NEVER MET MY GRANDSON. HAVE YOU? YEAH, HIS COMFORT ZONE IS 85. OH, OKAY. YEAH. TO PROVE IT, THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION. I I, THERE'S, THERE'S NOT A TON OF HOUSES ALONG THAT. UM, I, I DO THINK A SPEED IN INCREASE IS, IS WARRANTED FOR SURE. SO YOU HAVE NO CONCERNS ON THE SAFETY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? NO. YOU KNOW, WHEN WE, WHEN WE DESIGNED THIS ROADS, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE SET THE SPEED THAT WE SET IT FOR THE AREAS THAT HAVE THE LOWEST LEVEL. SO IN THIS CASE, YOU KNOW, THE CURBS IN AT 51, WE'VE, YOU KNOW, HAD PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE AREA THERE AROUND SILVERSTONE. AND SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT'S SETTING THE SPEED FOR THE WHOLE LOOP. AND THEN IT'S VERY COMMON TO DO THESE STUDIES TO REASSESS. IN FACT, WEATHERFORD DID IT ON THE OTHER PHASE OF THE LOOP. I THINK THEY UPPED IT TO 50, UH, AFTER WE FINISHED THAT PHASE. SO THAT'S PRETTY COMMON PROCESS TO ASSESS THAT. YEAH. IF I RECALL IN OUR DISCUSSIONS ON THIS, YOU HAD SAID, JUST TO KIND OF SUMMARIZE THAT, WHEN YOU PUT IN A NEW ROAD, YOU SET THE ENTIRE SPEED LIMIT FOR THE LOWEST PORTIONS. THAT'S CORRECT. AND THEN YOU GO BACK AND ADJUST LIKE WE'RE DOING NOW FOR THE PORTIONS THAT NEED IT. YES. OKAY. OKAY. FINAL CALL. ANY ANYBODY ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? WE'RE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING HERE. NINE C NINE. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 9 34 AND GO TO THE ITEM AND ASK FOR A MOTION. JUDGE, I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE INCREASE THE SPEED LIMIT ON THE PORTION IN RED FROM JOYCE STREET TO JUST BEFORE FM SEVEN 30 TO 55 MILES PER HOUR. MOTIONS MADE BY COMMISSIONER. HALT WITH THE SECONDMENT. COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE WE HONOR? IF WE APPROVE THIS TODAY, IS THERE A CERTAIN DELAY? I KNOW WE'VE HAD, WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THIS IN COURT AND WE HAD TO WAIT 30 DAYS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WHEN WOULD THIS GO INTO EFFECT COUNSEL? IF WE APPROVE IT TODAY IMMEDIATELY, BUT THEN I RIGHT. IT'D BE UPON VOTE. 'CAUSE PROPER NOTICE WAS PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER LISTENING TO THE DATE, TIME, LOCATION, PURPOSE OF TODAY'S HEARING. SO UPON APPROVAL BY THE COURT, IT WOULD CHANGE. PERFECT. IMMEDIATE. OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION CARRIES FIVE. OH, THANK YOU, BILL. CATCH YOUR FLIGHT. THANK YOU. WE'RE GONNA MOVE DOWN TO ITEM SEVEN B [7.B. Proclaim April 21-25, 2025 as Every Kid Healthy Week in Parker County. (Mandy Ebner / Kathy Smith / Cintia Ortiz / Judge Deen)] ON THE PROCLAIM. APRIL 21 THROUGH 25TH. 2025 IS EVERY KID HEALTHY WEEK IN PARKER COUNTY. UH, WE HAVE MANDY EBNER AND KATHY SMITH, UH, HERE. UH, IF YOU WOULD COME UP. WELL, THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING US TO COME TODAY. AND WE HAVE AARON AVAREZ AND ROSEMARY REAGAN. REAGAN, AND THEY ARE WITH COOK'S CHILDREN. AND EACH YEAR THE LA UH, THIS WEEK IS, UH, APRIL 21ST THROUGH 25TH IS DESIGNATED AS HEALTHY KIDS WEEK. AND IT'S, UH, BEEN A COLLABORATION PARKER COUNTY AND EXTENSION OFFICE, AS WELL AS COOK'S CHILDREN. AND, UH, WE ALL LOVE KIDS AND I FEEL LIKE PARKER COUNTY'S A GREAT PLACE TO, TO GROW UP AS A KID, BEING A PRODUCT OF PARKER COUNTY. AND, YOU KNOW, WE WANT OUR KIDS TO [00:35:01] BE HEALTHY AND, AND, AND THEY'RE OUR FUTURE FOR PARKER COUNTY. AND SO THE NATIONAL, UH, THE HEALTH KIDS WEEK EACH DAY FOCUSES ON A, ON A MAJOR TOPIC LIKE MONDAY IS MINDFUL MONDAYS, TASTY TUESDAYS, UH, WELLNESS WEDNESDAYS THOUGHTFUL THURSDAYS AND FAMILY FRIDAYS. AND, UH, THAT THROUGH THE WEEK WE'VE GOT, WE'RE GOING, WE'VE GOT BAGS TO GIVE OUT TO, TO KIDS. SO WITH HEALTHY TIPS AND NUTRITION, WE'VE GOT SOME OTHER ACTIVITIES GOING ON, BUT THE MAIN THING IS WE JUST WANNA PROMOTE HEALTHY KIDS. WE IN PARKER COUNTY AND WE APPRECIATE Y'ALL'S SUPPORT FOR THIS. OKAY. WOULD Y'ALL LIKE TO COME UP AND SAY ANYTHING? SURE. ON BEHALF OF COOK CHILDREN'S AND THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH, WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR THE PARTNERSHIPS THAT WE HAVE HERE IN WEATHERFORD AND PARKER COUNTY, ESPECIALLY WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND ALSO OTHER COMMUNITY PARTNERS SUCH AS PECAN VALLEY THAT HAVE MADE TREMENDOUS STRIDES ON MAKING SURE THAT ALL OF OUR KIDS ARE STRIVING FOR A BETTER HEALTHY LIFESTYLE. ALMOST 15 YEARS AGO, COOK CHILDREN'S, UH, CONDUCTED A COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PARKER COUNTY, THE STAKEHOLDERS AND EVERYBODY JUST SPOKE UP AND SAID, WE WANT 'EM TO SEE OUR KIDS HEALTHIER. SO WE'VE STARTED DIFFERENT INITIATIVES AND PARTNERED WITH GREAT PARTNERS, SUCH AS THE ACRO LIFE EXTENSION OFFICE TO COLLABORATE ON EVERY KID HEALTHY WEEK. AND SO WE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE CONTINUING PARTNERSHIP THAT WE HAVE WITH YOU. AND WHAT IS YOUR NAME, SIR? AARON RIS. OKAY. UM, MY APOLOGIES. OKAY. UM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING? OKAY. UM, WE HAVE A MOTION, UH, TO APPROVE THE PROCLAMATION BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY ON A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE. OH, UH, I HAVE A PROCLAMATION TO READ. THEN WE'LL HAVE Y'ALL COME UP AND TAKE A PICTURE WITH US. OKAY. THE START ABOUT THAT PROCLAMATION ON THE EVERY KID HEALTHY WEEK, WHEREAS IT, IT IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP FAMILY MEMBERS AND STUDENTS HEALTHY DURING THIS TIME, WHICH INCLUDES ALL AREAS OF HEALTH. AND WHEREAS HEALTHY KIDS ARE BETTER PREPARED TO LEARN AND THRIVE, AND WHEREAS THERE IS A NEED FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION AND A WIDE SCALE EFFORT TO ENHANCE HEALTHY PRACTICES. AND WHEREAS TEXAS A AND D AM AGGRO LIVE EXTENSION, CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY, PARKER COUNTY SYSTEM OF CARE PROJECT THRIVE, LED BY PECAN VALLEY CENTERS AND COOK CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH AND THEIR UNIQUE PARTNERSHIP AND PREVENTION BASED APPROACHES TO SERVING CHILDREN AND EFFECTIVELY ADDRESSING THE HEALTHY LIFESTYLES NEEDS OF CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES IN OUR COMMUNITY. NOW THEREFORE, BE A NOTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SCORE TO THE COUNTY OF PARKER DUE, HEREBY PROCLAIM APRIL 21 THROUGH 25TH. 2025 IS EVERY KID HEALTHY WEEK AND URGE ALL CITIZENS TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN. ENCOURAGING FAMILIES TO PARTICIPATE THIS WEEK BY HAVING FUN, PRACTICING HEALTHY HABITS AT HOME WITH EVERY KID HEALTHY WEEK ACTIVITIES, AND ALSO RECOMMEND ALL SCHOOLS ADOPT THESE ACTIVITIES TO IMPLEMENT WITH THEIR STUDENTS SAFELY. SO PROCLAIMED THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 IF Y'ALL WOULD COME ON OUT. OKAY. SORRY. ALRIGHT, WE'LL TAKE TWO PICTURES. 1, 2, 3. ONE MORE. 1, 2, 3. OKAY, THANK YOU. LET'S SEE HERE. I DON'T SEE, WE'RE GONNA GO AND I'M GONNA MOVE DOWN ONE MORE TIME ON THE MOVE DOWN TO ITEM SEVEN C [7.C. Approve the use of Parker County lots (4 quadrants, corner lots on Dallas/Spring and Waco/Spring) by The Weatherford Chamber of Commerce at no charge for the 40th Annual Parker County Peach Festival on Saturday, July 12th from 8am - 4pm. (Tammy Gazzola / Gloria Martinez / Judge Deen)] ON THE APPROVAL OF THE PARKER COUNTY. LOTS FOUR QUADRANTS, CORNER LOTS ON DALLAS, SPRING, AND WACO. SPRING BY THE WEATHERFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AT NO CHARGE FOR THE 40TH ANNUAL PARKER COUNTY PEACH FESTIVAL ON SATURDAY, JULY 12TH FROM EIGHT TO FOUR. UM, THERE YOU ARE. OKAY, HERE I AM. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. GLORIA MARTINEZ WEATHERFORD CHAMBER AND WE ARE REQUESTING THE USE OF THOSE LAWS. WE WILL BE CELEBRATING THE 40TH ANNUAL PARKER COUNTY PEACH FESTIVAL THIS YEAR. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION CARRIE? FIVE. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. [00:40:01] JUDGE, CAN YOU DO D WHILE YOU'RE THERE? D WHAT? RIGHT UNDER THE ONE YOU JUST DID. OH, OKAY. ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN D. [7.D. Consider/Approve the appointment of Alanna Melcher for membership to the Parker County Historical Commission. (Bill Warren / Judge Deen)] CONSIDER APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF ATLANTA MILER. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE PARKER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION. UH, BILL, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP, PLEASE? I SEEN BILL GETTING A LITTLE NERVOUS BACK THERE. WELL, YEAH, ALL I CAN SAY IS I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU ALL COVER ALL THAT YOU DO HERE. UH, I WOULD LIKE TO, UH, INTRODUCE ALANA MELCHER. SHE HAS ASKED FOR APPLICATION FOR THE PARKER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION. UH, SHE IS A RECENTLY RETIRED PHARMACIST, AND, UH, SHE ALSO HAS HAD A, SHE'S HAD AN INTEREST IN HISTORY AND PRESERVATION FOR A LONG TIME. SHE DID TELL ME THAT SHE STARTED OUT WANTING TO BE AN ANTHROPOLOGIST, UH, ALTHOUGH AS THEY SAY, LIFE GOT IN THE WAY WHILE YOU WERE MAKING OTHER PLANS. SO NOW SHE IS WANTING TO FULFILL HER, HER INTEREST IN, IN, UH, HISTORY AND ARCH, UH, THROUGH HER ARCHEOLOGIC ARCHEOLOGICAL ROOTS. THANK YOU. UH, SO, UH, BUT SHE DOES HAVE AN INTEREST IN CEMETERIES IN OLDER BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. AND, UH, WE THINK THAT SHE WOULD MAKE A MARVELOUS FIT TO THE PARKER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION. OKAY. AND ASK YOUR PERMISSION, UH, FOR HER APPOINTMENT. WOULD YOU, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING? NO. SO WE'VE BEEN HERE SINCE 2009 AND I ABSOLUTELY LOVE PARKER COUNTY. I'M VERY GLAD MY HUSBAND CHOSE TO RELOCATE HERE, AND THE HISTORY IS FABULOUS AND I'M REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO LEARNING MORE AND ACTUALLY HELPING MAKE A DIFFERENCE. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE. OH, I THINK THE IMPORTANCE, AGAIN, I I GO BACK TO, UH, I THINK IT IS THE LOCAL CHAPTER OF THE PARKER COUNTY OF THE HISTORIC COMMISSION THAT KEEPS US GROUNDED BECAUSE OF THE GROWTH THAT WE'RE HAVING. WE'RE CHALLENGED WITH MAINTAINING THAT RURAL INTEGRITY AND MAINTAINING THE WHO WE ARE, IF YOU WILL, AND MAINTAINING THOSE VALUES OF WHAT, WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE WE, WHERE WE CAME FROM AND WHERE WE'RE GOING. AND I THINK THE HISTORIC COMMISSION REALLY IS A BIG PART OF THAT. AND I THINK OUR DEMONSTRATION OF THIS CONTINUES TO THIS DAY. IF Y'ALL WOULD COME ON UP, WE'RE GONNA GET A PICTURE. , IF, IF YOU, IF YOU DON'T MIND, I CAN'T LET YOU OUT HERE WITHOUT OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. 1, 2, 3. ONE MORE. 1, 2, 3. THANK YOU. I PROMISE THE COURT I'M NOT GONNA HAVE EVERY ONE OF THESE ITEMS FOR A PICTURE, BUT IF YOU INDULGE ME HERE, WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM [4.D.1. Interdepartmental transfers of equipment and inventory reports.] D ONE ON ANY DEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS OF EQUIPMENT INVENTORY REPORTS. UH, KIM, WE DO HAVE SOME INVENTORY TRANSFER REPORT, UM, REPORTS OF EQUIPMENT, UM, MOST OF IT'S IT RELATED EQUIPMENT AND SOME RADIOS. THERE IS A PAVER THAT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM PRECINCT TWO TO PRECINCT FOUR, A FLATBED TRUCK FROM PERMITTING TO PRECINCT ONE AND A 2017 TAHOE FROM CONSTABLE THREE TO CONSTABLE TWO INCLUDED IN THE STACK THAT I GAVE TO LIAH. IT'S USE THAT IT'S A GOOD STACK. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HILL, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM FOR VOTE? ALL FAVOR, CARRIE? FIVE VOTE. MOVE TO ITEM TWO AND [4.D.2. Approve the donation of Bulletproof Vests & Helmets to ESD's & PCHD. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] APPROVE THE DONATION OF BULLET APPROVED VESTS AND HELMETS TO ESDS AND P THE PARKER COUNTY, UH, IS THIS PC HOSPITAL DISTRICT. HOSPITAL DISTRICT. OKAY. I WANNA BE SURE THAT THAT ACRONYM WAS CORRECT WHAT I WAS SAYING. UM, PROCEED. SO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IS REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO DON DONATE THESE, UM, BULLETPROOF VEST AND HELMETS. UM, 14 VESTS AND 16 HELMETS TO SD ONE FOUR VEST AND FIVE HELMETS TO ESD SIX, SIX VEST AND SEVEN HELMETS TO ESD SEVEN, SIX VEST AND SEVEN HELMETS TO ESD EIGHT, TWO VEST AND THREE HELMETS TO SD NINE AND FOUR VEST AND FIVE HELMETS TO PARKER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HA. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? IS IT, I GOT A, IS IT GETTING THAT DANGEROUS OUT THERE THAT THE ESDS HAVE TO WEAR BULLET PROOF OF THIS? SO, UM, NOT REALLY. UH, HOWEVER, THERE IS A THREAT FOR ACTIVE SHOOTER INCIDENTS, ESPECIALLY AT SCHOOLS AND GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS AND SHOPPING CENTERS. SO IN ORDER TO, UM, THE TRAINING FOR FIRE [00:45:01] AND POLICE IS TO STOP THE KILLING AND THEN STOP THE BLEEDING. SO, SO WHAT THEY DO IS THEY GO IN, THE COPS TAKE OUT THE BAD GUYS, AND THEN WE HAVE TO GO IN TO POTENTIALLY WARM ZONES WHERE IT'S NOT NECESSARILY SAFE FOR THOSE FIREFIGHTERS AND MEDICS TO GO IN THERE AND, AND COLLECT THOSE FOLKS, TRIAGE 'EM, GET 'EM TO CASUALTY COLLECTION POINTS AND GET 'EM TO THE HOSPITAL SO THEY HAVE SOME BALLISTIC PROTECTION BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING INTO AREAS WHERE IT'S NOT BEING CLEARED. SO THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THIS. THIS EQUIPMENT WAS DONATED RIGHT TO PARKER COUNTY AND WE'RE JUST PASSED THROUGH PUSHING IT OUT TO THOSE FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND EMS AGENCIES SO THAT THEY HAVE SOME BALLISTIC PROTECTION IN CASE WE HAVE A ISSUE INCIDENT LIKE THAT. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? YEAH, WELL, WE MAY NEED SOME OF THEM BEST DONATED TO US COMMISSIONERS THE WAY, THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING, WE CAN, WE CAN CHANGE THAT ALLOCATION IF NECESSARY. THE NEXT ONES THAT COME UP THINK ABOUT US BUDGETS. REALLY. YEAH. AND THEN BUDGET. THE BUDGET STUFF IS COMING UP. SO THAT'S, THAT'S ALL I GOT. WHY DON'T WE JUST GIVE SOMEBODY THE IDEA. UH, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CURIOUS FILE. MOVE TO ITEM THREE, APPROVE THE [4.D.3. Approve the salvage/destruction of Bulletproof Vests & Microsoft Surface Pro. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] SALVAGE OBSTRUCTION OF BULLETPROOF VEST AND MICROSOFT SURFACE PROBE. SO IT IS REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO SALVAGE AND DESTROY A MICROSOFT SURFACE PRO SIX. UM, IT DOES NOT HAVE A, A REMOVABLE HARD DRIVE ON IT, AND SO WE CANNOT, UM, WIPE IT ALL THE INFORMATION OFF OF IT. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? PAUL IN FAVOR WILL. WE ALSO HAD THREE, UM, ABOUT LIKE CARRIER VESTS THAT ALSO WERE REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO, TO, TO DESTROY THOSE AS WELL. OKAY. THE RECORD SHOW THAT THAT IS PART OF THE MOTION. ITEM FOUR EXCEPT [4.D.4. Accept/Rej ec t/Renew PC22-I5 Pavement Striping Services. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] FOR REJECT RENEW PC 22 DASH 15 PA STRIPPING SERVICES BID PC 22 DASH 15 FOR PAVEMENT DROPPING SERVICES WAS AWARDED TO TOTAL HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE AND IS ELIGIBLE FOR RENEWAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIOD. THE VENDOR HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN RENEWING THE BID FOR THE PERIOD OF MAY 1ST, 2025 THROUGH APRIL 30TH, 2026 AT THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER HALE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY DISCUSSION? JUDGE? I ACTUALLY DO HAVE A QUESTION ON THIS. UM, IF WE WERE TO UNDERTAKE A LARGE AMOUNT OF STRIPING IN OUR PRECINCT THAT WAS ALSO INSIDE OF, FOR EXAMPLE, CERTAIN, UH, TOWNS LIMITS OR ROADS THAT ARE UNDER CONTROL OF THE SCHOOL, CAN WE DO THAT VIA ONE? IN OTHER WORDS, CAN CAN THEY PAY THEIR PORTION TO THE COUNTY? CAN WE PIGGYBACK TOGETHER IN OTHER WORDS ON THAT? MM-HMM . HOW DOES THAT WORK? SO OUR CONTRACTS ARE PIGGY BACKABLE BY, UH, OTHER ENTITIES. OKAY. UM, AND SO WE JUST HAVE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING OR, OR AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THAT ENTITY TO UTILIZE OUR CONTRACTS. I'VE GOT A MEETING IN A COUPLE OF DAYS WHERE THAT MAY COME OUT. SO IF, IF THAT DOES LOOK LIKE THE DIRECTION WE'RE GOING, IF I SEND, IF I GET YOU, YOU AND BRIANNA, I GUESS IN THE LOOP, WE SHOULD BE GOOD. SO IS IT CITY OF EASTER? YES. OKAY. AND THEN ALSO THE SCHOOL OWNS A COUPLE OF ROADS THAT MIGHT NEED TO BE STRIPED AS WELL. I'LL CHECK. I DO BELIEVE, I THINK WE HAVE, HAVE DO WHAT WE CAN DO WITH ISDS TOO, JUST RIGHT. I I BELIEVE WE HAVE INTERLOCAL, BUT I'LL CHECK. WE DO HAVE A, YEAH, WE, WE DO HAVE AN MOU WITH, UH, WITH THE TOWN. UM, I'M PRETTY SURE WE HAVE WOMEN. OKAY. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU. YEP. CAME ANY, THE DISCUSSION ALL IN PAPER. CURIOUS POP. OH, MOVE TO ITEM [4.D.5. Accept/Reject/Renew RFP PC24-36 Countywide Waste Receptacles / Trash Pickup. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] FIVE, ACCEPT, REJECT, RENEW, RFP PC 24 DASH 36 COUNTYWIDE, WASTE RECEPTACLES TRASH PICKUP. SO RFP PC 24 DASH 36 COUNTYWIDE, WASTE RECEPTACLES AND TRASH PICKUP WAS AWARDED TO TJ SERVICES AND IT'S ELIGIBLE FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIOD. AND THE VENDOR HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN RENEWING AT THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 1ST, 2025 THROUGH MAY 31ST, 2026. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR, PERIOD. I MOVE TO ITEM SIX [4.D.6. Accept/Reject/Renew RFP PC24-41 Sale of Scrap Metals. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] EXCEPT REJECT. RENEW. RFP PC 24 DASH 41. SALE OF SCRAP METALS RFP PC 24 41 SELL OF SCRAP METALS WAS AWARDED TO GAIN TAX INDUSTRIES AND IS ELIGIBLE FOR RENEWAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIOD. THEY ALSO HAVE EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN RENEWING THE BID UNDER THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR JUNE 1ST, 2025 THROUGH MAY 31ST, 2026. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. YOU UNANIM THE DISCUSSION FOR THE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, CURIOUS BY VOTE. MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN. WE [4.D.7. Accept/Reject/Renew RFP PC24-44 Pharmaceutical Drugs for Jail Inmates. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] SET PROJECT RENEW AT RFP PC 24 DASH 44. PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS PER JAIL, INMATES R-F-P-P-C 24 44, PHARMACEUTICAL [00:50:01] DRUGS FOR PARKER COUNTY JAIL. INMATES WAS AWARDED TO INDEPENDENT HEALTH SERVICES AND IT'S ALSO ELIGIBLE FOR RENEWAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIOD. THE VENDOR HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN RENEWING UNDER THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR JULY 1ST, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30TH, 2026. MOTION IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE AND I SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. UM, JUST ONE QUICK THING, UM, AND I'M GLAD YOU CAME IN, UH, CAPTAIN ON THAT AND THE, UH, DISCUSSION WE HAVE WITH THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT ON THE PHARMAC, THE, THE PRESCRIPTION PHARMACEUTICALS. HOW DOES THAT APPLY HERE? IS THERE ANY ISSUE ON THIS? I'M GONNA BE HONEST WITH YOU. I I WASN'T PART OF THAT DISCUSSION. I HAVE NO IDEA. OKAY. WELL, WE'LL DEFER THAT DOWN FROM THE FUTURE DISCUSSION AND I'LL BRING THAT UP WITH THE SHERIFF. OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? WELL, PROBABLY MOST LIKELY THE, UH, ACCEPTING THIS, UH, BID WILL NOT HAVE ANY EFFECT ON. I, I DON'T THINK SO. I JUST WANTED TO THE BID THERE. WE CAN USE IT IF WE NEED TO, BUT IF SOMETHING ELSE RIGHT, SUPERSEDES THAT, THEN YEAH, I JUST, I JUST WANTED TO DOUBT THE I ON THAT. OKAY. UM, ALSO ALL IN PAPER, CARRIE FIVE OH, MOVE TO [4.D.8. Authorization to Advertise RFP PC25-20 Collections of Fines & Fees - JP Courts. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] ITEM MADE ON AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE RFP PC 25 DASH 20 COLLECTIONS OF FINES AND FEES DUE, JP COURTS REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE THE R-F-P-P-C 25 20 FOR COLLECTION OF OUTSTANDING FEES FOR JP COURTS. WE'RE HOPING TO ADVERTISE ON APRIL 16TH AND APRIL 23RD WITH AN ANTICIPATED OPENING OF MAY 7TH AND AN AWARD DATE OF MAY 27TH. OKAY, COMMISSIONER WALDEN HAS MADE THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL ON PAPER CARRIES FIVE OH, MOVE TO ITEM [4.D.9. Authorization of Surplus Property List in an Online Auction. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] NINE, AUTHORIZATION TO SURPLUS PROPERTY LIST AND AN ONLINE AUCTION. SO REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO, UM, ADVERTISE AND OPEN THE ONLINE AUCTION FOR SURPLUS MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, UM, WITH AN ADVERTISING DATE OF APRIL 19TH AND APRIL 23RD. AND THE AUCTION WOULD START ON APRIL 21ST AND RUN THROUGH MAY 2ND. AND THEN PICKUP WOULD BE MAY 5TH THROUGH THE 16TH. OKAY. AND THERE'S A LIST OF ALL THE ITEMS, UM, THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED, UH, PREPARED AND HANDED OUT. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. CURIOUS. FIVE OH, MOVE TO ITEM 10. AUTHORIZATION ADVERTISE [4.D.10. Authorization to Advertise RFP PC25-21 HVAC Units. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] R-F-P-P-C 25 21 HVAC UNITS REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE R-F-P-P-C 25 DASH 21 HVAC UNITS. THESE ARE FOR THE DISTRICT COURTHOUSE ANTICIPATED, UM, ADVERTISING DATES OF APRIL 16TH AND 23RD. A BID OPENING OF MAY 6TH AND AWARD DATE OF MAY 12TH ON, I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL. WE'RE IN THE DISCUSSION PASS. I HAD A QUESTION WHERE, WHERE DO WE ADVERTISE SOMETHING SUCH AS THIS? WELL, UM, WE ADVERTISE IN THE DEMOCRAT AND THEN WE ALSO WILL BE ADVERTISING IN AT THE, UM, COMMUNITY NEWS. YES, NEWS. COMMUNITY NEWS. I WAS GONNA SAY LEAD TRIBUNE. I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT CAME, BUT, UM, AND THEN ALSO WITH MY BONFIRE BIT SOFTWARE, IT SENDS OUT PUBLIC NOTIFICATIONS TO ANY VENDOR THAT IS REGISTERED THROUGH THAT PORTAL FOR THAT COMMODITY. OKAY. SO PERFECT. SHOULD THAT BE SOMETHING WE PUT ON OUR WEB PAGE ALSO? IS THAT THERE'S A LINK TO THAT. THERE IS. OKAY. VERY GOOD. YEP. OKAY. UM, WE HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE FIVE OH, MOVE TO ITEM 11. ACCEPT [4.D.11. Accept/Reject/Renew PC25-12 Motor Fuels. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] REJECTING UPC 25 DASH 12 MOTOR FUELS FOUR RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED FOR PC 25 DASH 12 MOTOR FUELS FROM SYNERGY PETROLEUM, US ENERGY, SUNCOAST RESOURCES, AND OFTEN PETROLEUM. IT'S RECOMMENDED THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT AWARD THE BID TO SYNERGY PETROLEUM AS THE LOWEST OF BEST VALUE BID. UM, WITH THIS IT'S GONNA COME SOME CHANGES. UH, YOU ALL HAVE, UH, THE METER MONITORS ON YOUR GAS TANKS AND SO FUEL TANKS AND SO THOSE BELONG TO, UM, THE INCUMBENT MARTIN, OR IT USED TO BE MARTIN EAGLE. IT'S NOW THE US UM, ENERGY. YEAH. SO THEY WILL BE COMING AND PICKING THOSE UP. NOW THERE WE DID HAVE THE OPTION TO, FOR YOU ALL TO PURCHASE YOUR OWN METERS. UM, THIS LAST GO AROUND. UM, IF YOU WANT THOSE METERS, IT, IT IS A BIG HELP TO THE VENDOR IN ORDER TO KNOW WHEN TO DELIVER FUEL SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE THESE ISSUES OF RUNNING OUT. I'LL GET THROUGH HER. I I NEED TO GO BACK AND LOOK. I BELIEVE IT WAS, UM, LESS THAN A THOUSAND LAST YEAR. WELL, I'LL GO BACK AND CHECK. OKAY. WHY I I SAY IT. BUT ARE THEY AWARE OF OUR DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS? YES. OKAY. THEY ARE. AND [00:55:01] IN FACT, THE, UM, THE VENDOR THAT WAS ORIGINALLY AWARDED LAST YEAR'S CONTRACT OFF IN PETROLEUM, THEY WERE THE LOW BID. HOWEVER, I DON'T RECOMMEND THEM BASED ON THE, THEIR, UM, PERFORMANCE LAST YEAR AND US CANCELING THAT CONTRACT. I, I SAW THAT AND I RECOGNIZED THAT. I JUST YES. CHECKING TO BE SURE. SYNERGY, UM, UM, IS A WELL KNOWN PETROLEUM DELIVERY COMPANY AND, UM, I FEEL LIKE WE'LL BE IN GOOD HANDS. OKAY. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL OF FAVOR. CARRIE? FIVE OH. ITEM 12 [4.D.12. RFP PC24-43 Jail Expansion Change Order #3, ADA Ramp. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] RFP PC 24 DASH 43. JAIL EXPANSION CHANGE ORDER NUMBER THREE, A DA RAMP. SO THIS IS, UM, AN A CHANGE ORDER TO THE JAIL EXPANSION PROJECT. THE JAIL, UM, THERE'S AN A DA RAMP THAT NEEDS TO BE BUSTED OUT IN FRONT OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND REPLACED. AND SO WE'VE AT REQUESTED, UM, THE VENDOR INTEGRITY CONTRACTORS TO GIVE US A PROPOSAL FOR THIS AND INCLUDE IT ON THEIR PROJECT SO THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO GO BACK OUT FOR BID. AND SO THEY AGREED TO DO SO. AND THE CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT IS FOR $10,826. AND WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE OLD ONE? IT'S GOT SOME, UH, SO IN ORDER FOR OUR VENDOR, UH, BEAR HAMPTON AND BROWN TO SIGN OFF ON THE DISPATCH EXPANSION, THERE HAS TO BE AN AADA, A COMPLIANT RAMP INTO THE BUILDING RIGHT NOW. UH, THE LANDING, WHEN YOU COME TO THE FRONT DOORS, THERE'S ABOUT A MAYBE A THREE INCH, UH, STEP UP. SO IT'S NOT COMPLIANT. AND SO THEY SAID THAT WE HAVE TO FIX IT. BASICALLY THE CHEAPEST AND EASIEST WAY TO DO IT WOULD BE TO BUST IT UP AND REPORT THAT SECTION. THANK YOU. WHERE'S THE MONEY GONNA COME FROM? SO, UM, THIS, WE'RE GONNA, WE'RE LOOKING AT TEXT NOTES TO COVER THESE THINGS WITH, WITH LEFT FROM THE, UM, UM, I'M SORRY, I'M DRAWING WHICH PROJECT WAS IT? WE HAVE . WE HAVE THE, UM, PATROL BUILDING PERHAPS. YES. YES. AND THEN THERE MIGHT BE SOME CLOTHES LEFT FROM, UM, LAST YEAR'S BUDGET FROM THE AUTO REGISTRATION. OKAY. FOR RENOVATION. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIES FIVE VOTE. I WANNA MOVE DOWN TO ITEM [10.D. PRECINCT 4 (Part 1 of 2)] D, PRECINCT FOUR, NUMBER SEVEN. AND AGAIN, UH, BRIAN, I APOLOGIZE THAT THAT SLIPPED BY ME IF YOU HAD COME ON UP. UM, WHAT, WHAT PRECINCT? PRECINCT FOUR. I'VE, I'VE GOT MORE TIME THAN MONEY JUDGE. I'LL REMEMBER THAT. . UM, THIS IS ITEM SEVEN. APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF WILLOW PARK FOR ROAD REPAIRS AND TAKE ANY ACTION ON THE COURT TEAMS NECESSARY. COMM, COMMISSIONER. HA. WE'VE, WE'VE, UH, HAD INTERLOCALS IN THE PAST WITH WILLOW PARK AND IT'S BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL AND, UH, SO I RECOMMEND THAT WE DO THIS AGAIN. I WANNA COMMEND YOUR GUYS. Y'ALL DO SOME OF THE BEST WORK. I'VE HAD 17 YEARS OF, OF CITY MANAGEMENT A GREAT JOB. APPRECIATE THAT. I'LL BE SURE AND LET THEM KNOW. THANK YOU. OKAY. MOTION RIGHT BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECOND, MY COMMISSIONER. COLLEEN, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE WE VOTE? ALL ON PAPER CARRIES FIVE. OH AGAIN, SORRY TO MAKE YOU WAIT. OH, NO PROBLEM. NO PROBLEM. SLIP. THANKS GUYS. THANK YOU. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO, UH, GIVEN THE AUDIENCE THAT WE HAVE HERE, UH, WE'RE GONNA MAKE A MOVE DOWN TO AN ITEM NINE OR EXECUTIVE SESSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH [9. EXECUTIVE SESSION] SECTIONS 5 5 1 0 7 1 AND OH SEVEN TWO. AND SO SEVEN SIX AND TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE RESERVING THE RIGHT TO MEET AND CLOSE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE, THIS WOULD BE THE ITEM C AS MIGHT AS WELL JUST GO AHEAD AND COVER IT. MOVE TO ITEM A IF WE DO DECIDE TO DO THAT UNDER ITEM A. REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE CLAIMS COMPENSATION BUREAU OF ACTION CASE FOR PRESCRIPTION DEDUCTS AND TAKE ANY ACTION QUANTITIES AS NECESSARY. ITEM B, UPDATE DISCUSSION ON PARKER COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER. ITEM C, DISCUSS RECOMMENDATIONS, SECURITY MEASURES FOR THE SPACE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE AND TAKE ANY ACTION OF COURT DEEMED NECESSARY. AND THE RECORD SHOW. UM, WE WILL MOVE TO, UH, EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 10 O'CLOCK. DO YOU WANT A COUPLE MINUTE BREAK OR YOU WANT TO GO ON IN? UH, WE'LL MOVE RIGHT ON INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 10 0 1. AMEN. YES. WE'LL TAKE A COUPLE MINUTE BREAK AND THEN WE'LL AJOUR THE EXECUTIVE SESSION. [01:00:04] EXECUTIVE SESSION, THE RECORD SHOW AT 1103 AND MOVE TO ITEM NINE AND GO UNDER ITEM A REVIEW AND EXECUTE THE CLAIMS COMPENSATION BUREAU CLASS ACTION CASE FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. AND TAKE ANY ACTION ON THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY. IS THERE A MOTION ON THAT? I'M MAKING THE MOTION THAT WE AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE COMPENSATION SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE CLAIMS COMPENSATION BUREAU. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER. HOLD SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE. OH, MOVE TO ITEM I, I. SORRY. MOVE TO ITEM B UPDATE, DISCUSS. PARKER COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER WILL TAKE NO ACTION. MOVE TO ITEM C, DISCUSS RECOMMENDATIONS AND SECURITY MEASURES FROM THE SPACE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE AND TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT NEEDS NECESSARY. JUDGE, I MOVE THAT THE, UH, I MOVE TO APPROVE THE, UH, RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPACE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE FOR THE COURTHOUSE ANNEX. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL THE PAPER THERE VOTE. I'M SORRY. COMMISSIONER, YOU SAID SOMETHING. MY MINE'S NOT WORKING'S, NO MATTER LETTER. OKAY. TELL TELL ME WHAT IT'S UP. WHAT WE'LL DO, WE'LL DO A, A VOCAL BEFORE YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE. I WANT TO, I WANT TO THANK THE COMMITTEE ON THE OUT THE, UH, RELOCATION OF EVERYBODY IN THE ANNEX, JUDGE MARTIN AND JENNY GENTRY AND CHIEF LILA DLE BROWN AND MR. LONG. I I WANT THANK Y'ALL FOR WHAT ALL Y'ALL DID. YEAH. WE, WE ALL SECOND THAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ESPECIALLY UNDER A COST EFFECTIVE MEASURES THAT MINIMIZE THAT. BRIANNA, THAT SHOULD MAKE YOU HAPPY. . OKAY. WE'LL MOVE BACK TO ITEM [7.E. Discuss/Take action on utilizing Bureau Veritas for Parker County's fire plan reviews. (Randy Franks / Judge Deen)] SEVEN E, DISCUSS, TAKE ACTION ON UTILIZING BUREAU OF VERITAS FOR PARKER COUNTY'S FIRE PLAN REVIEWS. RANDY FRANKS, YOU WOULD COME UP YES. AS YOU REQUESTED, I BROUGHT, UM, GENTLEMAN BRIAN HANNA FROM, UH, BUREAU VERITAS TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT Y'ALL HAVE. OKAY. IF YOU WOULD COME ON UP PLEASE AND STATE YOUR NAME. THANK YOU FOR COMING BY THE WAY. OH, NOT A PROBLEM. I'M BRIAN HANNA FROM BUREAU VERITAS FIRE PROGRAM MANAGER. EXCUSE ME. YOU SAY YOUR NAME AGAIN? I'M BRIAN HANNA. I'M WITH BUREAU OF VERITAS. I'M THE FIRE PROGRAM MANAGER FOR, FOR THE STATE. BRIAN, THANK YOU FOR COMING. NOT A PROBLEM. OKAY. SO IF YOU WOULD JUST, I GUESS, GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN OVERVIEW OF KIND OF WHAT THAT, THAT SERVICE ENTAILS. WHAT WE EXPECT HERE IS YES, IT'S, IT'S A, UH, WE, WE DO IT SEVERAL DIFFERENT WAYS FOR DIFFERENT, UH, JURISDICTIONS. WHAT WE'VE PROPOSED HERE IS BASICALLY IT'S A THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT WITH THE CONTRACTORS, SO THERE'S NO COST TO THE COUNTY. UH, IT'S A WAY IT GIVES THE CONTRACTORS AND, AND DEVELOPERS AN OPTION TO USE US AS A THIRD PARTY AND EXPEDITE IT THROUGH THE COUNTY'S PROCESS. UH, TRY TO TAKE A LOAD OFF OF, OFF OF YOUR STAFF HERE, AND IT, IT WOULD BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IF THEY CHOOSE TO GO THAT ROUTE. UH, BUT IT WOULD JUST, IT WOULD NEED TO BE ACCEPTED, YOU KNOW, OUR REPORTS AND EVERYTHING WOULD BE, NEED TO BE ACCEPTED BY YOUR STAFF HERE. WHAT COUNTIES DO YOU CURRENTLY WORK WITH? UH, WELL, WE HAVE OVER 200 CITIES IN TEXAS RIGHT NOW. OKAY. UH, BUT SPECIFICALLY WITH THIS TYPE OF AGREEMENT, WE HAVE HIGHLAND PARK, UH, PROSPER SHERMAN. UH, WE DO INSPECTIONS THERE AS WELL, UH, IN HIGHLAND PARK AND, UH, SHERMAN, WE DO INSPECTIONS, BUT, YOU KNOW, THAT'S NOT BEING PROPOSED HERE AT THIS TIME. BUT, UH, UH, PROSPER, WE DO PLAN REVIEW FOR, BUT THEN ARLINGTON, WE'VE DONE PLAN REVIEW, BUT THEN WE ALSO DO SOME SPECIAL PROJECTS LIKE CHOCTAW, WHO THEY DON'T HAVE AN A SJ TO SPEAK OF, SO THEY HIRE US TO, UH, WE DID THE RANGER STADIUM AND WE'RE DOING TEXAS INSTRUMENTS IN SHERMAN. SO WE'VE DONE SOME, SOME VERY LARGE PROJECTS, BUT, UH, WE ALSO DO A LOT OF SMALLER CITIES WHO ARE GROWING. THE ANNA VAN STEIN, MELISSA ALL UP NORTH. THOSE ARE ALL OF OUR CUSTOMERS AND WE BASICALLY JUST HELP BOLSTER THE STAFFING AND, UH, AND, UH, PROVIDE. BUT LIKE I SAID, WHAT WE PROPOSE HERE IS BASICALLY THIRD PARTY TO WHERE THE CONTRACTORS WOULD BE PAYING THE, OUR FEES FOR THAT. OKAY. JUST TO EXPEDITE IT THROUGH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE COMMISSIONERS ON THIS? I HAD A COUPLE QUESTIONS ON, ARE, ARE YOU FAMILIAR, HAVE YOU LOOKED AT OUR COUNTY REGS AND WHAT EXACTLY YOU WOULD BE REVIEWING AND LOOKING FOR? WE WOULD BE GETTING WITH, [01:05:01] UH, MR. FRANKS ABOUT THAT, UH, LATER. UH, I KNOW THE COUNTY DOESN'T HAVE BUILDING CODES PER SE, UH, BUT YOU CAN'T ADOPT A FIRE CODE OR AT THE VERY LEAST YOU HAVE TO, UH, YOU KNOW, HAVE SOMETHING TO REVIEW TOO. OF COURSE. YEAH. SOME, UH, STANDARDS. SO, UH, BASICALLY WITH ALL THE CITIES WE WORK WITH, WE GATHER ALL OF THAT INFORMATION IN A SURVEY PACKAGE FOR OUR PLAN REVIEWERS MM-HMM . AND PROVIDE ALL THE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND ALL OF THAT. SO I WOULD BE GETTING THAT TOGETHER BEFORE ANY WORK WAS DONE. AND THAT'S KINDA WHERE WE ARE BEING A COUNTY. MM-HMM . AND THEN WE HAVE, ESPECIALLY IN MY PRECINCT, SO MUCH COMMERCIAL COMING AND, UM, YOU KNOW, IT'S, WE'RE WORKING ON QUITE A BIT NOW, BUT, UH, THAT'S WHERE I WAS WONDERING WHAT OUR ACTUAL COUNTY OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY IS AT THE MOMENT AND WHAT MM-HMM . YOU'RE ABLE TO ACTUALLY REVIEW AND REQUIRE. WELL, UH, SO AT THE COUNTY LEVEL, SORRY. OH, OKAY. YEAH. UH, WELL, THE, THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE, OR THEY ACTUALLY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REVIEW PLANS, OF COURSE, NOT HAVING A FIRE CODE PER SE IN YOUR ORDINANCE, YOU WOULD JUST REVIEW TO WHATEVER'S NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STANDARD. THEY CHOOSE TO, YOU KNOW, THAT'S, UH, TYPICALLY IT'S AN INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE MM-HMM . WHICH A REVERSION, THE STATE IS UNDER THAT 2018, I BELIEVE RIGHT NOW. SO YOU COULD JUST CHOOSE THAT AS BY POLICY THAT WE REVIEW THAT, THAT WAY IT'S MORE, YOU KNOW, IT'S CONSISTENT. YOU DON'T WANT TO PICK AND CHOOSE REVIEW TO THIS ONE ON THIS PERSON AND THIS ONE ON THIS PERSON. 'CAUSE THAT'S ASKING OH, I, I WOULD AGREE. BUT, UH, NO, WE WOULD, UH, WE WOULD JUST, UH, GET WHATEVER POLICY THAT THE COUNTY EITHER THAT, THAT STANDARD, I WOULD RECOMMEND THE IFC OF COURSE. 'CAUSE THAT'S ALL THE NEIGHBORS ARE GONNA BE DOING THE SAME. THAT BUILDS CONSISTENCY. DO, DO OUR CURRENT ESDS HAVE ANY AUTHORITY OR ANY OVERSIGHT ON COMMERCIAL TYPE PROJECTS OR NEW COMMERCIAL GOING VERTICAL? WE GO ABOUT, LIKE I TOLD YOU, UH, LAST MEETING WAS ANYTHING OVER 12,000 SQUARE FEET. MM-HMM . WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. YEP. UNLESS, UNLESS THEY CAN SHOW ME WHERE THE BUILDING'S GONNA BE BUILT, WHAT'S IT GONNA BE NEXT TO, AND WHAT THEY'RE GONNA HAVE INSIDE THE BUILDING. AND THEN WE CAN GO TO TWO DIFFERENT OPTIONS. WE CAN GO TO FIREWALLS AND FIRE BREAKS. OKAY. BUT IN THE MAJORITY, WHEN I'M HAVING A LOT OF THESE PEOPLE CALLING ME SAYING THEY'RE GONNA PUT A 70 AND A 80,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING IN MM-HMM . AGAIN, WE GO BACK TO WHERE'S IT GONNA BE BUILT AT? WHAT'S IT GONNA BE NEXT TO, IS IT GONNA BE NEXT TO A SCHOOL, A CHURCH, WHATEVER, WHAT'S, WHAT'S GONNA BE IN IT? AND WE, WE, WE REQUIRE 'EM TO PUT A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN. UH, AND AGAIN, I THINK THE, THE LITTLE DEAL THAT I SENT Y'ALL, THE LITTLE I HAVE PEOPLE CALL ME ALL THE TIME AND SAY, WELL, I WAS TOLD I DIDN'T HAVE TO HAVE ONE IN THE COUNTY. I DIDN'T HAVE TO FOLLOW ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS OR ANY, AND, YOU KNOW, AND, AND MY REQUIREMENT TO HIM WAS, WELL, THEY'RE GOING, I SAID, THIS IS WHAT WE REQUIRE. AND HE SAYS, WELL, HOW COME YOU'RE PICKING ON ME TO DO THAT? I SAID, I'M NOT, YOU MADE THE MISTAKE. YOU CALL ME AND TELL ME WHERE YOU WAS GOING TO BUILD IT AND WHAT YOU'S GONNA HAVE IN IT. SO NOW YOU PUT ME ON THE SPOT THAT I KNOW WHAT'S GONNA BE IN IT. SO THAT'S WHY I'M REQUIRING YOU TO PUT A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. SO, AND IF WE DON'T WANT TO DO THAT, THEN ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS, IS JUST, Y'ALL JUST SAY, WE DON'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING WITH THAT, THEN WE'LL PUT IT IN WRITING AND I WON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. SO I, I THINK WHAT WE NEED IS, 'CAUSE WE GET THOSE QUESTIONS TOO, A LOT, A LOT OF TIMES DEVELOPERS OR BUILDERS WILL CALL US. YEAH. UH, I THINK WHAT WE NEED IS, IS TO, UM, TO KNOW WHAT OUR REQUIREMENTS ARE SO THAT WE, AND, AND SO NOT, NOT, NOT RIGHT NOW, BUT WHAT I'D ASK YOU TO DO CHIEF, IS, IS JUST GET THAT INFORMATION TO US, WHAT THE ACTUAL REQUIREMENTS ARE, AND, UH, WE CAN, WE CAN START, CAN APPROVE, UH, THE THIRD PARTY, UH, INSPECTION TODAY. AND, UH, BUT, BUT OVER TIME, AS YOU HAVE TIME, JUST GET THAT INFORMATION TO US SO THAT WE CAN DID Y'ALL, I GET THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT I SENT YOU. I, I'LL HOLD IT IN MY HAND RIGHT HERE. I'LL EXPLAIN ALL THAT STUFF. I'M, I'M HOLDING IT IN MY HAND RIGHT HERE. OKAY. BUT, UH, UH, I, I, I DIDN'T SEE WHERE WE CAN CHOOSE. I MEAN, WE HAVE AN OPTION OF ONE OR THE OTHER. I, I SAY THAT, UH, IF IT'S A RULE THAT WE HAVE, UH, TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY REVIEW AND HAVE PLANS OF A BUILDING OVER 12,000 SQUARE FEET, THEN THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I CAN CONVEY THEN TO PEOPLE WHO ASK ME RATHER THAN JUST TELLING 'EM TO CALL YOU. SEE? RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE KIND OF INFORMATION THAT I WANT. I WANNA BE SURE THAT I'M ON FIRM GROUND WHEN I'M QUOTING, YOU KNOW? OKAY. [01:10:01] SO THAT'S ALL I'M AFTER. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OTHER, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION, THEN I'M GONNA MOVE THAT WE, UH, APPROVE THE, UH, UTILIZATION OF THE BUREAU TIS FOR PARKER COUNTY'S FIRE SW REVIEWS. YES, IT WORKED. OKAY. WE HAVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OF THAT DISCUSSION? ALL, ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? CARRIE FIVE VOTE. THANK YOU FOR COMING VERY MUCH. THANKS FOR BEING HERE. SORRY TO MAKE YOU WAIT SO LONG. NO, THANK YOU, HONOR. [7.F. Discuss/Approve the County Judge to sign MOA for federal encryption keys. (James Caywood / Judge Deen)] MOVE TO ITEM F. WE DISCUSS, APPROVE THE COUNTY JUDGE HAS SIGN A MOA FOR FEDERAL ENCRYPTION KEYS, JAMES. SO, UH, LOOKING FOR APPROVAL, HAVE THE JUDGE SIGN A HOMELAND SECURITY AGREEMENT. UH, TAKE, UH, UH, BETTER DOCUMENTATION ON, UH, UH, ENCRYPTION KEYS THAT GO IN EFFECT FOR OUR ENCRYPTION, UH, ENCRYPTED RADIO CHANNELS, ANY MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? CARRIE? FIVE. OH, THANK YOU, JAMES. OKAY. YOU GOT THE NEXT ONE TOO? OKAY. APPROVAL FOR MOTOROLA UPGRADE PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS THREE, FOUR, AND FIVE AS WE, UH, TAKE NO ACTION. AND I'LL SCHEDULE AGAIN TO HAVE MOTOROLA, UH, WITH ME. SOUNDS NEXT COURT. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM H AND TAKE NO ACTION ON ITEM G. LET, UH, NO ON H NO ON G ON G. NO. NO ON G. NO ACTION ON G. OH OH. OKAY. OKAY. GOTCHA. MOVE TO [7.H. Discuss/Approve updated North Residential Disposal Center price sheet to go into effect 5/1/2025. (Commissioner Conley)] ITEM H AND DISCUSS APPROVE. UPDATED NORTH RESIDENTIAL DISPOSAL CENTER PRICE SHEET TO GO INTO EFFECT 5 0 1 20 25. MR. CONLEY, WE'RE CHANGING SOME OF OUR PRICES TO MATCH, UH, THE SOUTH DISPOSAL CENTER. THAT'S ALL THIS IS ABOUT. AND IF YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT WE'RE CHANGING, SEVEN H HAS SOME OF THE, THE PAPER ON WHAT WE ONLY CHANGED A FEW ITEMS, BUT, UH, MOVE TO APPROVE THE CHANGING OF SOME OF THOSE PRICES. KING BUSH MAY BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER. HA. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. GARY'S FIVE, OH, GO BACK TO UNDER ITEM [7.I. Discuss/Approve modifying the scope of the Additional Personnel Committee to include requests for new capital purchases and take any other actions as necessary. (Commissioner Holt)] I DISCUSS APPROVED MODIFYING THE SCOPE OF THE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL COMMITTEE TO INCLUDE REQUESTS FOR NEW CAPITAL PURCHASES AND TAKE ANY OTHER ACTIONS AS NECESSARY. COMMISSIONER HOL, WE MET LAST WEEK AND PART OF THE CONVERSATION THAT WE CAME TO WAS THAT GIVEN HOW CONNECTED, A LOT OF TIMES LARGE CAPITAL PURCHASES ARE TO NEW EMPLOYEES, SUCH AS WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ET CETERA, BUT IT MADE A LOT OF SENSE TO BROADEN THIS JUST A BIT SO THAT WHEN WE'RE DISCUSSING THESE NEW PERSONNEL, UM, IN THE BUDGET CYCLE, THAT WE INCLUDE CAPITAL AS WELL. SO A HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE COMMITTEE AGREED THAT THESE TWO ARE INTERCONNECTED, AND THEN WE NEED THAT SCOPE AS WELL. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALL, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIE PAVO MOVE TO ITEM J, UH, WILL TAKE NO ACTION. MOVE TO ITEM K, [7.K. Discuss policies and procedures for purchasing auction equipment. (Brianna Fowler / Commissioner Walden) (Part 1 of 2)] DISCUSS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PURCHASING AUCTION EQUIPMENT. BRIANNA. OKAY. I ASKED FOR THIS AGENDA ITEM TO BE PUT ON, UM, TODAY TO DISCUSS WHAT, UM, WE DON'T HAVE IT FORMERLY IN OUR PURCHASING POLICIES, UM, BUT FOR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE IN A, UM, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS AND POLICIES REGARDING AUCTIONS. SO, UM, THIS RELATES TO BUYING, YOU KNOW, EQUIPMENT, PERSONAL PROPERTY OFF OF THE AUCTIONS. AND SO, UM, WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DO IS PRIOR TO REGISTERING FOR ANY OF THESE, ENSURING THAT THEY ARE AN APPROVED VENDOR. UM, SO THAT'S GETTING WITH PURCHASING TO GET ALL THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION SET UP. UM, AND ALSO JUST THAT ALSO, UM, ALLOWS KIM TO SEE WHAT IS IT THAT WE'RE PURCHASING AND, UM, WHAT SORT OF THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE, UM, IN COMPLIANCE WITH, UH, PROCUREMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF BID THRESHOLDS. UM, ONE RECOMMENDATION I WOULD MAKE IS, UM, ANNUALLY FOR COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO APPROVE A DISCRETIONARY EXEMPTION FOR PERSONAL, UH, FOR PURCHASES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AT AUCTION BY A STATE LICENSED AUCTIONEER, AS WELL AS PURCHASING FROM OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS. SO, UM, UNDER 2 62 0.024, THERE ARE DISCRETIONARY EXEMPTIONS FOR THIS. UM, SO IF WE JUST GO AHEAD AND HAVE THAT APPROVED, SAY AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH FISCAL YEAR, THEN IT GIVES US THE AUTHORIZATION, UM, TO PURCHASE OFF OF AN AUCTION AND STILL BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH, UM, ALL PROCUREMENT LAWS. UM, [01:15:01] SO AGAIN, IT'S DOING THAT, HAVING THAT VENDOR SET UP AHEAD OF TIME, UM, MAKING SURE THAT YOU HAVE APPROPRIATE BUDGET IN THAT LINE, AND THEN MAKING SURE THAT AN APPROVED PURCHASE ORDER, UM, IS IN PLACE. AND SO WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IS IF YOU'RE PURCHASING SOMETHING, UM, HAVE THAT PO TO THE MAX BID THAT YOU'RE WILLING TO BID ON WHATEVER ITEMS THAT IT IS. UM, AND THEN IF YOU WEREN'T, YOU KNOW, IF YOU DIDN'T ACTUALLY GET THAT WINNING BID, THEN IT'S EASY ENOUGH TO CLOSE THAT PURCHASE ORDER OR AGAIN, THEN WE HAVE A PURCHASE ORDER IN PLACE, UM, PRIOR TO, UM, BIDDING ON THOSE ITEMS AND HAVING THAT LIABILITY OF THE COUNTY. SO I'M THE ONLY ONE THAT'S EVER DONE THIS, I'M QUITE SURE. HOWEVER, UH, THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, THAT'S THE NEXT ITEM. THERE WAS A, WAS A TRAILER THAT I BOUGHT, UH, AT AN AUCTION THAT I WAS GONNA BUY A NEW ONE FOR. AND I BOUGHT THIS TRAILER WITH PERFECT SHAPE FOR ABOUT HALF PRICE OF WHAT A NEW ONE WOULD COST. SO, UH, I NEED TO POINT OUT THAT IN DOING SO THAT I, I DID NOTIFY PURCHASING EACH TIME AND LET THEM KNOW, UH, KIM, THAT, THAT I WAS GOING TO BID ON AN ITEM AT AN AUCTION AHEAD OF TIME IN BOTH OF THESE. THE OTHER ONE, I BOUGHT A, A, A PAVING MACHINE FROM TARRANT COUNTY, UH, THROUGH, THROUGH RENEE BATES AUCTION. AND SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I'M, I, I NEED THE ABILITY TO DO BECAUSE I HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THOSE THINGS. UH, I NEED TO, TO BE ABLE TO EVALUATE AND, AND MAKE A PURCHASE HERE FOR THE, FOR THE PAVER THAT I BOUGHT FROM TARRANT COUNTY PRECINCT TWO, I THINK, UH, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S A PAVER THAT'S ABOUT 10 YEARS OLD AND I GAVE $40,000 FOR IT, AND NEW WOULD COST 500, YOU KNOW, AND IT'S A VERY USABLE MACHINE. WE'VE GOT IT. AND, AND, UH, WE'LL BE PAVING WITH IT NEXT WEEK. BUT, UM, I, I JUST HAVE FOLLOWED THE CORRECT, THE SAME PROCEDURES THAT WERE OUTLINED FOR ME 12 YEARS AGO WHEN I BECAME COMMISSIONER. BUT I, I WANT TO BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE FOLLOWING THE CORRECT PROCEDURE AND, UH, THAT, BUT, UH, I ALSO WANT IT VERY CLEAR THAT WE DID NOT VIOLATE ANY PURCHASING PROCEDURES THAT WERE KNOWLEDGEABLE TO US BECAUSE WE'VE DONE WHAT WE'VE DONE FOR THE LAST 12 YEARS. AND THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TWO PIECES THAT I BOUGHT. IT'S PROBABLY 10 OR MORE THAT I BOUGHT THROUGH AUCTION. WELL, THE ISSUE IS, IF I LOOK AT LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 1 13 0 6 5, IT SAYS THE COUNTY AUDITOR MAY NOT AUDIT OR APPROVE A CLAIM UNLESS THE CLAIM WAS INCUR INCURRED AS PROVIDED BY LAW. AND PART OF THAT IS TO HAVE AN EXECUTED PURCHASE ORDER IN PLACE. I I UNDERSTAND THAT. AND SO THAT'S WHY I'VE ASKED FOR THE PROCEDURES TO PUT ON HERE BECAUSE ON WHICH, JUST SO WE HAVE IT FOR THE RECORD OF COURT, THAT THERE WAS, UM, YOU PURCHASED EQUIPMENT AT AUCTION ON SATURDAY, MARCH 15TH, AND THEN THE REQUEST FOR A PO WAS MADE ON THAT SUBSEQUENT MONDAY. I UNDERSTAND THAT IN THE PAST, I, I HAD NOT HAD THAT ISSUE IN THE PAST WHEN I HAD NOTIFIED PURCHASING, I HAD NOTIFIED PURCHASING THAT I MIGHT BUY A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AT, AT AUCTION, WHICH I DID FOR, FOR EACH OF THESE. UH, BUT IF WE'RE NOT FOLLOWING A PROCEDURE, WE WANT TO FOLLOW A PROCEDURE. CORRECT. AND THAT'S WHY I'VE ASKED THIS TO PUT ON YOU, WE TO, HOWEVER, UM, I I I JUST WANTED VERY CLEAR THAT, THAT I HAD FOLLOWED THE SAME PROCEDURES THAT I HAD PREVIOUSLY USED WHEN I BOUGHT EQUIPMENT AT AN AUCTION. WELL THEN I BELIEVE YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED TO HAVE A PO IN PLACE PRIOR TO I UNDERSTAND THAT. I UNDERSTAND THIS, I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT I'M TELLING YOU THAT THAT WAS NEVER THE CASE BEFORE. RIGHT. AND SO, BECAUSE IT DID COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, THAT'S WHY I ASKED FOR THIS TO BE ON THERE. SO THAT WAY WE ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH YEAH, I, I DON'T THE LAW, SO DON'T MISUNDERSTAND. RIGHT. I DON'T WANNA BE IN, I DON'T WANNA BE OUT OF COMPLIANCE ON ANYTHING, BUT I, I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE RULES ARE AHEAD OF TIME BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, I, I DID NOT FOLLOW THE RIGHT, I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY FROM WHAT I HAD DONE WHEN I PREVIOUSLY PURCHASED ITEMS AT AN AUCTION. SO ANY SORT OF PURCHASE, WHETHER WE'RE DOING PURCHASING, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, ANYTHING ELSE, AN APPROVED PURCHASE ORDER MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO, UM, THOSE SERVICES BEING PERFORMED OR MAKING ANY SORT OF LIABILITY, UM, FOR THE COUNTY. I UNDERSTAND THAT. UH, I, WHAT I'M GOING TO POINT OUT AND I WANT CLEARLY STATED IN THE MINUTES, IS THAT WE DID NOT VIOLATE ANYTHING OTHER, UH, THAT WE DID NOT DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN WHAT WE HAD DONE PREVIOUSLY WHEN WE PURCHASED THE ITEMS AT AUCTION. AND THAT IF WE HAD KNOWN THAT WE NEEDED TO HAVE A PURCHASE ORDER TO COVER THE MAXIMUM PRICE AHEAD OF TIME, WE WOULD HAVE HAD THAT IN PLACE. RIGHT. AND THAT'S WHY I ASKED FOR THIS TO PUT ON THERE BECAUSE IF THAT'S WHAT HAD BEEN GOING ON WHEN IT'S TURNED INTO US, WE DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION. OR IT WASN'T INCLUDED IN THERE WHENEVER IT MAY HAVE BEEN PURCHASED PREVIOUSLY. AND SO SINCE THIS WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION OF WHAT IS INCURRED, I CANNOT SUBMIT IT FOR PAYMENT BECAUSE IT DIDN'T GO THROUGH THE PROPER PROCUREMENT PROCESS. AND SO I JUST WANNA, SO IT'S OUT THERE FOR THE REST OF THE COURT AS IF YOU WERE PURCHASING FROM AN AUCTION. THESE ARE THE CORRECT STEPS TO TAKE. AND WHAT WE NEED TO DO, AND AGAIN, [01:20:01] IN ORDER FOR ME TO THEN PROCESS THIS INVOICE FOR THIS CLAIM, IS FOR COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO APPROVE THAT. OKAY. SO WE CAN STILL GO TO AN AUCTION, WE JUST CORRECT. WE JUST NEED TO FOLLOW THIS. AND SO MAYBE WHAT WE'LL DO IS I'LL ASK FOR KIM, UM, TO HAVE THIS DISCRETIONARY EXEMPTION TO PUT ON THE AGENDA TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE MEETING PROCUREMENT POLICIES AS WELL AS ANY OTHER, UM, PROCEDURES, WHICH AGAIN, ALL OF 'EM IS TO HAVE AN APPROVED PURCHASE ORDER IN PLACE PRIOR TO INCURRING THAT LIABILITY. SO WE'LL TAKE NO ACTION ON THAT TODAY, THEN YOU'LL HAVE THAT NO, I NEED IT TO BE APPROVED. YOU NEED, YOU NEED THAT PART APPROVED, CORRECT? YES. OKAY. CAN I, CAN I GET SOME CLARIFICATION? YES. JUST FOR ME, UH, DOES THE AUCTIONEER OR THE AUCTION COMPANY, THEY HAVE TO BE AN APPROVED, THEY HAVE TO BE ON SYSTEM, A VENDOR, THEY HAVE TO BE A VENDOR. NOW THIS PARTICULAR, UH, O'LEARY AUCTIONS WILL NOT TAKE A PO. SO HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THAT? BUT THAT, THAT'S THE ONE THAT YOU USE. CREDIT CARD MM-HMM . SO WE, WE PAY, MAKE PAYMENT THROUGH THE CITIBANK. AND I'VE ALWAYS TOLD Y'ALL, I'LL MAKE SURE YOU HAVE YOUR CITIBANK PO IN PLACE. BUT THIS, THIS, THIS PURCHASE WITH THE, UM, PAPER HAPPENED OVER A WEEKEND. I WAS OUTTA COUNTRY. NO, WITH THE TRAILER. AND ACTUALLY I DID SPEAK TO YOU THE MONEY AFTER HOURS, AFTER HOURS ON FRIDAY. I WAS OUTTA THE COUNTRY. I'VE TALKED TO YOU ABOUT IT. AFTER HOURS ON FRIDAY, I TALKED TO SOMEBODY AT PURCHASING AFTER HOURS ON FRIDAY WITH THIS TREASURE, I WAS OUTTA THE COUNTRY. 'CAUSE I FOUND OUT FROM AN EMAIL ON A, YEAH. AND THEN SHE SENT A TEXT SABRINA THEN. YEP. OKAY. SO, UM, YEAH, WE ALWAYS, YOU KNOW, EVEN WHEN YOU USE A CREDIT CARD, WE ALWAYS SAY, MAKE SURE YOU HAVE YOUR PO IN PLACE AT CITIBANK NOW, AND NOT JUST THAT WITH THE CREDIT CARD, WE CANNOT, YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TO, JUST LIKE ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE ARE PAYING FOR, YOU HAVE TO HAVE THAT ITEM BEFORE A PAYMENT IS BEING ISSUED. RIGHT. AND THAT WOULD ALSO REQUIRE, BECAUSE THE CREDIT CARD IS ONLY FOR TRAVEL, UNLESS IT'S BEEN DISCUSSED THAT THAT'S THE MOST, YOU KNOW, EFFECT MOMENT IN THERE OF SAYS THE CARD POLICY SAYS WITH PURCHASING'S APPROVAL TO CORRECT. SO IT'S WITH THAT, WITH THIS, BUT WE ALWAYS SAY YOU HAVE TO HAVE SPECIFIC TO WHAT BRIANNA IS ASKING, DID THAT PART OF IT, WE NEED APPROVAL, WE NEED A MOTION FOR THAT. AND THEN YOU'LL COME BACK TO US WITH THE OTHER OKAY. IN THE NEXT AGENDA. AND IF YOU WOULD GET WITH RICH ON THAT AND WE'LL COVER THAT. OKAY. SO IT'S ALL WORKABLE, RIGHT? CORRECT. AND THAT'S WHAT IT IS. WE JUST WANNA, WE WANNA BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ALL CAN OPERATE AND PURCHASE WHAT YOU NEED. WE JUST NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? YES, THE, THE, UH, THE REASON THAT THIS WAS PURCHASED AT THIS AUCTION AT THIS PARTICULAR DEAL WAS BECAUSE IT WAS ABOUT HALF PRICE OF WHAT A NEW ONE WOULD COST. AND I CHOSE TO BUY THAT USED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AT THIS AUCTION. AND I WILL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO MAKE SURE, BUT I, I, AGAIN, WE DIDN'T FOLLOW ANY PROCEDURE THAT WE HADN'T USED PREVIOUSLY. OKAY. NOTED. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE? FIVE VOTE. [7.L. Take action regarding Precinct 3 equipment purchase from Bradley O'Leary Auctions. (Brianna Fowler / Commissioner Walden)] MOVE TO ITEM L, TAKE ACTION. REGARDING PRECINCT THREE. EQUIPMENT PURCHASED FROM BRADLEY O'LEARY AUCTIONS. THAT WAS THE ITEM. SORRY, THE FIRST WAS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AND THE SECOND WAS THE APPROVAL MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WAL AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? FIVE VOTE. [7.M. Update on Opioid Abatement Settlement Funds and Reporting and take any action the court deems necessary. (Brianna Fowler / Judge Deen)] MOVE TO ITEM M, UPDATE ON OPIOID ABATEMENT, SETTLEMENT FINES AND REPORTING AND TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY. BRIANNA, UM, I'VE PROVIDED YOU ALL AN EMAIL THAT I RECEIVED AS AN UPDATE TO THE OPIOID ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT FUNDS, AND NOW NEW REQUIRED REPORTING. UM, SO FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025, WE WILL HAVE TO, UM, PROVIDE AN ANNUAL REPORT, UM, TO THE COMPTROLLER ON, UM, THE AMOUNT OF FUNDS THAT WE'VE RECEIVED FROM THE O OPIOID ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT, AS WELL AS ANY, UM, USES OF THOSE FUNDS TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES. UM, SO TO DATE, WE HAVE RECEIVED THREE PAYMENTS, UM, WITH THE LAST ONE BEING, UM, APRIL 1ST OF THIS YEAR. AND SO WE HAVE RECEIVED 320,485 AND 35 CENTS. UM, SO IN THAT EMAIL THAT I PROVIDED YOU ALL, UM, IS ALL THE USES, UM, FOR THE OPIOID ABATEMENT SETTLEMENT FUNDS. SO, UM, SHOULD THE COURT WANT TO BRING ANYTHING FORWARD, UM, FOR USE OF THOSE FUNDS, THAT'S THE GUIDANCE THAT YOU NEED TO REFERENCE. AND THEN AGAIN, UM, I'M IMAGINING YOU WILL RECEIVE MORE INFORMATION, BUT AT THE BEGINNING OF NEXT YEAR, UM, WE'LL RECEIVE WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO THE REPORT. AND SO ALL THEY'VE PUT IS BASICALLY HOW MUCH HAVE YOU RECEIVED AND HOW HAVE YOU UTILIZED THOSE FUNDS? OKAY. YOU WANNA ASK FOR MOTION? DO WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE? NO, IT'S REALLY JUST AN UPDATE. IS THAT, YEAH. WELL, OKAY. RIGHT. NO ACTION ON THAT. JUDGE, CAN I REVISIT, [7.K. Discuss policies and procedures for purchasing auction equipment. (Brianna Fowler / Commissioner Walden) (Part 2 of 2)] UH, ITEM K, PLEASE. JUST FOR A MOMENT. WE'RE [01:25:01] ON ITEM K. SO THE NEXT QUESTION, AND I I, IT SLIPPED MY MIND, BUT I NEED TO ASK THIS QUESTION. SO IF THERE'S AN ITEM THAT COSTS MORE THAN $50,000, THEN HOW ARE WE GOING TO MANAGE THAT? 'CAUSE I HAPPEN TO KNOW THAT TARRANT COUNTY HAS TWO, TWO PIECES OF EQUIPMENT THAT COME UP THAT ARE GOING TO COME UP IN A, UH, FUTURE AUCTION THAT COSTS MORE THAN 50, THAT WILL MOST LIKELY COST MORE THAN $50,000. THAT'S THIS DISCRETIONARY EXEMPTION. UM, BOTH ONE OF 'EM IS, UH, PURCHASING FROM A LICENSE, ESTATE LICENSE AUCTIONEER, AND THEN ALSO FROM ANOTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION. SO IN THAT RESOLUTION, WE'LL HAVE BOTH OF THOSE ITEMS OR DO 'EM AS, AS SEPARATE. OKAY. SO THAT WAY, BECAUSE EVEN IF IT'S SAY YOU'RE PURCHASING JUST THE TRAILER, THAT'S LESS THAN IT IF AN AGGREGATE RIGHT, WE'RE PURCHASING, WE NEED TO LOOK AT ALL PURCHASES. OKAY. SO THAT'LL COVER BOTH OF THOSE PIECES FROM THE PROCUREMENT AND THEN MAKING SURE THAT THE PO'S IN PLACE. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. YOU FOR CLARIFICATION. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM [7.N. Discuss/Take action on FY 2024 Rebatable Arbitrage and Yield Restriction Post-Issuance Compliance Reports. (Brianna Fowler / Judge Deen)] N ON DISCUSS TAKE ACTION ON FY 2024, DEBATABLE ARBITRAGE AND YIELD RESTRICTION POST ISSUANCE COMPLIANCE REPORTS. OKAY, SO WHAT I'VE PROVIDED YOU ALL, UM, THIS FIRST PAGE IS A SUMMARY OF OUR ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE FOR FY 2024. SO AS OF SEPTEMBER 30TH. UM, SO PART OF, IN EVERY SINGLE, UM, BOND ORDER THAT WE HAVE, ONE THING THAT WE HAVE TO, UM, CONFIRM TO IS THAT WE ARE GOING TO PERFORM POST ISSUANCE COMPLIANCE AS IT RELATES TO, UM, ARBITRAGE AND YIELD RESTRICTIONS. AND SO, UM, WE DO UTILIZE A THIRD PARTY HILLTOP SECURITIES, UM, OR A DIVISION OF HILLTOP SECURITIES TO PERFORM OUR, UM, ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE. AND SO, UM, WE AS THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE SEND THEM, UM, ALL THE DOCUMENTATION, INVESTMENT STATEMENTS, EVERYTHING THAT THEY NEED TO DO TO PERFORM THEIR CALCULATIONS. UM, I BELIEVE I'VE PROVIDED YOU ALL, IF NOT I WILL THE FULL REPORTS, UM, WHICH THEY'RE ABOUT 40 PAGES OF CALCULATIONS FOR EVERY SINGLE BOND SERIES. AND THEN THIS HERE IS THE SUMMARY. UM, SO AS YOU CAN SEE FOR THE DELIVERY DATE FOR OUR UNLIMITED TAX ROAD BOND SERIES 2020 THAT WERE ISSUED MARCH 12TH, 2020, UM, WE ACTUALLY AS OF SEPTEMBER 30TH, HAVE A LIABILITY OF 559,668 AND 90 CENTS. UM, SO YOU CAN SEE THAT BOND YIELD IS 1.9%, UM, WHEN WE ISSUED THOSE BONDS. AND SO AGAIN, THAT'S PART OF RIGHT, THE INTEREST PAYMENT THAT WE PAY, UM, FOR THOSE. AND IF WE LOOK AT WHERE OUR INTEREST EARNINGS ARE RIGHT NOW, IT'S A LOT HIGHER THAN THAT. AND SO WHAT IT IS IS, UM, BECAUSE THESE ARE TAX EXEMPT, UM, BONDS, UM, BASICALLY LOOKING AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BOND YIELD AND THEN WHAT WE'RE INVESTING THOSE PROCEEDS IN. AND SO THAT DIFFERENCE THEN HAS TO BE REBATED TO THE IRS. UM, SO THIS NEXT ITEM, SO THIS IS JUST A SUMMARY OF IT, THIS NEXT ITEM IS, UM, TO ACTUALLY PAY THE IRS FOR, UM, THAT'S ARBITRATED OR DEBATABLE ARBITRAGE PAYMENT, UM, THAT IS DUE MAY 12TH OF THIS YEAR. AND SO, UM, THE CALCULATION DATE IS MARCH 12TH, 2025. AND SO, UM, I'VE PROVIDED HILLTOP WITH ALL THE INFORMATION THAT THEY NEED TO UPDATE, UM, THE CALCULATION FROM WHAT THEY'VE PERFORMED AT SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2024. AND SO I DO, UM, I EXPECT THAT THE LIABILITY WILL GROW AND BECAUSE WE HAVE TO MAKE THAT PAYMENT ON TIME, I'M REQUESTING THAT THE COURT, ONCE I RECEIVE, UM, THE UPDATED CALCULATION THAT WE CAN, UM, PROVIDE THAT OR WE CAN PROCESS THAT PAYMENT TO THE IRS OUTSIDE OF COURT. UM, ONE OTHER ITEM THAT THEY REQUIRE IS TO, UM, COMPLETE THE IRS FORM 8 0 3 8 DASH T AND GIVING ME AUTHORIZATION TO, UM, SIGN THAT FORM. AND SO AS PART OF THE ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE HILLTOP, UM, FILLS OUT THAT FORM AND ALL THE INFORMATION THAT WE NEED IN ORDER TO MAKE THAT PAYMENT TO THE IRS. DO WE HAVE AN ESTIMATE ON WHAT THE TOTAL MIGHT GROW TO? UM, NO. JUST REASONABLY SPEAKING ROUND NUMBER, I DON'T, AND SO ONE THING I GUESS KIND OF TO GO TO THAT IS THIS IS ON OUR 2016 TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM. AND SO I'VE WORKED WITH FREEZE AND NICHOLS TO, UM, SOME OF THE 2023 PROJECTS, UM, SOME OF THE ENGINEERING RIGHT AWAY, SOME OF THOSE COSTS WE'VE ACTUALLY PUSHED USING 2016 FUNDS. [01:30:01] UM, BECAUSE ONCE ALL OF THOSE FUNDS HAVE BEEN EXPENDED, HAVE BEEN USED, THEN THAT BASICALLY OUR LIABILITY WILL STOP AT THAT POINT. UM, AND JUST ONE THING, JUST TO MAKE CLEAR WITH THIS IS WE WILL ALWAYS BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS, UM, THAT WE DREW DOWN. THIS IS ONLY RELATED TO THE INTEREST. AND SO WE GET TO, WHICH IS GREAT, WE GET TO USE, UM, PART OF THAT INTEREST FOR PROJECT FUNDS, WHICH AGAIN, YOU KNOW, STRETCHES THOSE DOLLARS. AND SO THIS, THE ARBITRAGE BASICALLY JUST, UM, REDUCES THE AMOUNT THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY ABLE TO USE, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE ARE ALWAYS GONNA BE ABLE TO USE, UM, THE TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS THAT WE DREW DOWN THAT WAS AUTHORIZED. AND WHAT'S THE CHECK WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO WRITE 'EM ESTIMATED TO BE TODAY? UM, SO 5 59 6 6 8 AS OF SEPTEMBER 30TH. AND SO, UM, BECKY AND I ACTUALLY HAVE A HAD A PHONE CALL LAST WEEK WITH THE PERSON THAT HANDLES IT AND HE THOUGHT IT WAS PROBABLY GONNA BE AROUND 650,000, BUT HE WAS STILL, UM, WORKING ON THOSE CALCULATIONS. SO IT MAY, IT MAY ACTUALLY BE A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN THAT. SO YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO GET AT IS WHAT IS THAT ESTIMATE? THAT'S WHAT HE THOUGHT, BUT IT WAS KIND OF 700 PROBABLY. YES, YES. OKAY. SO YES. AND THIS IS THE SERIES 2020, WHICH ARE THE FUNDS FROM THE 2016 BOND THAT WERE NOT CALLED UNTIL 2020, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT, YES. YES. DO WE HAVE, AND SO JUST SO YOU KNOW, UM, ON THIS SUMMARY, WHICH IT'S GREAT TOO, IT HAS, UM, UPCOMING IRS DATES AND SO THIS SHOWS WHAT THE CALCULATION DATE AS WELL AS THE PAYMENT DATE IS. AND SO I THINK FROM THIS PAYMENT THEN OUR FINAL ONE WILL BE DUE IN FIVE YEARS. BUT I THINK WHAT WE'LL ACTUALLY DO, UM, IS ONCE WE ALL THOSE ARE EXPENDED, HAVE THEM DO A FINAL CALCULATION AND GO AHEAD AND JUST PAY THAT EARLY TO HAVE IT, UM, THAT LIABILITY MOVED OFF OUR BOOKS. SO WE'VE ALREADY HANDLED THIS FOR THE, THE 20 17, 20 16 ET CETERA, BECAUSE OF A FIVE YEAR WINDOW. YEAH. ON SOME OF THOSE, WHEN THEY CALCULATE IT, WE DIDN'T HAVE IT. AND ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, IN THE PAST THIS HASN'T REALLY BEEN AN ISSUE, BUT YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY IF YOU LOOK AT, AGAIN, WHEN WE ISSUED DEBT IN 2020 WHERE RATES WERE AND NOW WHERE INVESTMENT RETURNS ARE RIGHT NOW, YEAH, IT'S CREATED IT, SO IT'S VERY COMMON THAT A LOT OF ENTITIES ARE, YOU KNOW, HAVING TO MAKE THESE PAYMENTS. AND SO, UM, IT'S REALLY GOOD THAT WE DO HAVE THAT CONTRACT WITH THEM TO DO, TO PERFORM THIS CALCULATION ANNUALLY. SO THEN THE COURT, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE KNOWING KIND OF WHAT YOUR LIABILITIES ARE AND REALLY WATCHING THAT VERSUS, YOU KNOW, IF YOU WEREN'T DOING IT AND THEN FIND OUT YOU ACTUALLY HAVE PAYMENTS DUE. AND THEN I ASSUME THIS IS ONLY IN THE EVENT OF ARBITRAGE. SO IN OTHER WORDS, IF IT GOES THE OTHER DIRECTION, WE'RE NOT PENALIZED BY THE ROS. RIGHT. AND THERE'S ONE THING TOO THAT THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT, THERE'S UM, REBATE ARBITRAGE AND THEN THERE'S YIELD RESTRICTIONS. SO EVEN IF YOU LOOK, UM, SAY AT THAT 2020 SERIES, UM, FOR THE REBATE LIABILITY, IT'S ACTUALLY NEGATIVE, BUT THEN ON THE YIELD RESTRICTION IT'S POSITIVE. AND SO THEY DON'T LET YOU KNIT THOSE TWO THINGS. THEY'RE ACTUALLY TWO IN THE TAX CODE, THEY'RE TWO SEPARATE CALCULATIONS, TWO SEPARATE THINGS. SO UNFORTUNATELY WE CAN'T NET THEM. YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THEM SEPARATELY. AND SO THEY PERFORM BOTH THOSE CALCULATIONS FOR US. GOT IT. I COULD BE WRONG, BUT I DON'T REMEMBER HAVING TO PAY THIS BEFORE. I DON'T THINK WE EVER MET. WE HAVEN'T. THIS IS, I MEAN, PRIOR TO ENGAGING HILLTOP, UM, WE DIDN'T HAVE SOMEONE DOING THESE CALCULATIONS, BUT PROBABLY HISTORICALLY BASED ON WHERE THINGS WERE, IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SOMETHING THAT WAS NECESSARY. AND WHEN WE FIRST ENGAGED THEM, UM, WHICH PROBABLY WAS IN, I WANT TO SAY IT WAS IN 2019 PERHAPS, WE ACTUALLY HAD TO DO A 10 YEAR LOOK BACK. SO I PROVIDED THEM 10 YEARS OF DATA TO ENSURE THAT WE DIDN'T ACTUALLY HAVE ANY SORT OF LIABILITIES AT THAT POINT IN TIME. SO I'M GONNA MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE. UM, AND IT, DO YOU WANT THIS UNDER N OR DO YOU WANT THIS UNDER O? WE'RE LET'S NOT IN. YEAH, WE'RE IN. OKAY. WE'RE OWN IN. SO REALLY FOR N IT'S REALLY JUST AN UPDATE FOR YOU ALL, UM, TO HAVE THIS AS WELL AS ONE THING I PUT IN HERE BECAUSE IT IS, I MEAN IT CAN, IT SOUNDS LIKE BE A LITTLE CONFUSING TECHNICALLY, RIGHT? SO WE'LL TYPE NO ACTION. AND SO THIS KIND OF JUST EXPLAINS IT KIND OF A HIGH LEVEL AND IT'S A REALLY GOOD SHORT DOCUMENT TO UNDERSTAND IT N CORRECT AND GO TO O OKAY, WE'RE ON [7.O. Discuss/Approve payment to IRS and filing of Form 8038-T. (Brianna Fowler / Judge Deen)] O DISCUSSION. I'LL MAKE THE MOTION. SORRY, GO AHEAD. UH, I WAS OPENING THE ITEM AND PROCEED. OKAY. SO I'LL MAKE THE MOTION ON O THAT WE APPROVE PAYMENT UP TO, BUT NOT EXCEEDING 700,000 MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER, LET'S JUST SAY OF WHATEVER HE'LL OR WHATEVER THEY CALCULATE. JUST IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS OVER, I WILL PROVIDE YOU ALL WITH AN UPDATE OF WHAT THAT NUMBER IS. YOU GIMME A CEILING, SO I'M NOT NERVOUS. , WHAT? CAN YOU GIVE ME A CEILING? SO I'M NOT NERVOUS. I HATE TO, I HATE TO AUTHORIZE. I, I MEAN I JUST REALLY DON'T, I CAN'T IMAGINE THAT IT WOULD GO THAT, BUT I REALLY, I, I DON'T KNOW, BUT YOU'LL UPDATE US WHEN YOU GET, SO I WOULD [01:35:01] JUST SAY TO APPROVE THE PAYMENT, UM, I GUESS AS CALCULATED BY HILLTOP SECURITY. YES. SO EVEN IF IT COMES BACK AT 1.2 MILLION, RIGHT? CORRECT. NOT THAT IT WILL, RIGHT? YOU HAVE TO PAY THAT. YES. AND SO I THINK IT WAS, EVEN IF YOU WERE LATE, YOU HAD A PENALTY OF 50% OF WHATEVER YOUR LIABILITY IS, PLUS THEY CALCULATE INTEREST ON THAT PENALTY. YEAH, WE HAVE, WE HAVE TO DO IT. SO, AND THAT'S WHY I'M PUTTING IT ON THE AGENDA NOW. SO, UM, ONCE THEY HAVE FINISHED THAT CALCULATION, WE CAN GO AHEAD AND, UM, GET THAT PAYMENT PROCESSED AND NOT BE LATE. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY TAKE OFF THE LIMITATION MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. JUST CALCULATED BY, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE. THANK YOU ALL. MOVE [7.P. Discuss and take action regarding the Patrol and Election Buildings parking lots. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] TO ITEM P AND DISCUSSED AND TAKE ACTION REGARDING THE PATROL AND ELECTION BUILDINGS PARKING LOTS, KIM. SO I PLACED THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE, UM, WE NEED TO KIND OF GET CLARIFICATION ON WHO'S GOING TO BE DOING THE, THE WORK FOR THE PATROL BUILDING, UH, PARKING LOT AND THE ELECTIONS BUILDING PARKING LOT SO THAT WE HAVE A PLAN. AND THEN ONCE Y'ALL DETERMINE THE COST OF WHAT EACH PRECINCT, WHO'S GONNA BE DOING PART OF THE WORK, UM, THEN WE COME BACK TO COURT AND GET THAT, UH, ACTUALLY APPROVED AND, AND . SO WE, WE HAVE DONE THE, THE, YOU KNOW, THE ROUGH DIRT WORK AT THE PATROL BUILDING PREVIOUSLY ALREADY, BUT IT HAS NOT BEEN BILLED TO IT. IT IS NOT, I I GUESS I ASSUME THAT IT'S NOT AS, I MEAN, WE'VE JUST ASKED TO DO THE WORK, WE'VE DONE THE WORK. UM, WE ARE ALSO, UH, WAITING ON THE CONCRETE TO SET UP TO A POINT WHERE WE CAN DRIVE ACROSS THE SIDEWALKS TO GET IN THERE TO BUILD A PARKING LOT. SO, WELL, WE'D AGREED TO DO THE ENTIRETY OF THAT PROJECT, IS THAT CORRECT? RIGHT. AND THEN WE'VE, WE HAVE AGREED THEN TO DO THE, THE DIRT WORK ON THE ELECTION BUILDING. UH, IT'S GONNA REMOVE A LOT OF STUFF, REMOVE SOME TREES AND REMOVE A LOT OF MATERIAL THERE. THAT'S IN THE WAY OF THE NEW PARKING LOT THAT'S GONNA BE BUILT. AND WE WON'T BE DOING THAT UNTIL AFTER THE, UH, MAY ELECTION TAKES PLACE. AND SO WE HAD JUST WANTED THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE ANYTIME, RIGHT, THE PRECINCTS DO WORK FOR THE GENERAL, GENERAL FUND, IT INCURS THE LIABILITY FOR THE GENERAL FUND. SO WE JUST WANTED TO ENSURE THAT THAT AUTHORIZATION, UM, IS COMPLETED AND THEN TO DISCUSS AT THAT POINT THEN WHERE, UM, YOU KNOW, GENERAL FUND WOULD ACTUALLY PAY FOR THESE EXPENSES. SO IF THERE'S NOT, UM, FUNDS IN THE PROJECT BUDGETS, THEN IT WOULD NEED TO COME FROM THE GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY. SO WE WANTED TO ENSURE THAT PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING COMPLETED, ONE THE COURT IS APPROVES WHICH PRECINCT'S DOING IT, AND THEN KNOWING THAT THE GENERAL FUND WILL INCUR A LIABILITY RELATED TO THAT. SO NEED, WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT? YES. OKAY. I WOULD ASK FOR THAT MOTION. I, I GUESS I WAS GONNA FINISH THEN, THEN PRECINCT ONE HAD, I THINK HAD AGREED TO DO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PARKING LOT AT, AT THE ELECTION. THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH, BUT WE WE'RE GONNA DO THE DIRT WORK REMOVAL MATERIALS. OKAY, WE'LL MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. IS THERE ANY OF THAT DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, QVO. MOVE [7.Q. Approve and authorize the County Judge to execute the Culligan QUENCH Proposal and Rental Agreement for PCSO SCU water/ice machine. (Kim Rivas / Judge Deen)] TO ITEM Q. APPROVE, AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY JUDGE TO EXECUTE THE CULLIGAN QUENCH PROPOSAL AND RENTAL AGREEMENT FOR PARKER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SCU WATER, ICE MACHINE. SO THIS IS, UM, JUST FOR A NEW WATER AND ICE MACHINE AT THE S FOR SU AND THEY'RE INCLUDING AN ELECTIONS BUILDING AREA AND IT'S WITH CULLIGAN QUIN, UH, LEASE AGREEMENT IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT IS $215. THAT'S A ONE TIME FEE PLUS THE $208 A MONTH, UM, RENTAL FEE. OKAY? AND THEY DO HAVE THAT IN THEIR BUDGET LINE. I HAVE THAT I FOR MOTION. MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER HOLT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL I EVER CURIOUS ABOVE, MOVE [7.R. Interlocal Agreement between Parker County and City of Aledo for Dispatch Services and take any action the court deems necessary. (John Forrest / Judge Deen)] TO ITEM R IN OUR LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARKER COUNTY AND CITY OF ALITO FOR DISPATCH AND TAKE ANY ACTION IN THE COURT. DES NECESSARY. GOOD MORNING. MARK BARNETT SHERIFF'S OFFICE. UH, THE CITY IS, EVERYBODY KNOWS THE CITY OF ALITO IS ATTEMPTING TO ESTABLISH ITS OWN POLICE DEPARTMENT AS PART OF THE PROCESS TO GET CERTIFIED THROUGH T COLE. THEY'RE REQUIRED TO GET CERTAIN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS IN PLACE. ONE OF THOSE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS IS FOR DISPATCHING SERVICES, SO THEY REQUESTED THAT, WELL, I, WE WORK TOGETHER AND, UH, COME UP WITH AN INTERLOCAL THAT MIRRORS THE ONES THAT WE ALREADY HAVE WITH HUDSON OAKS AND RENO AND WILL PARK. AND THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT WE GO AHEAD AND APPROVE IT, UM, BUT NOT BASICALLY START THE [01:40:01] SERVICES OR, OR CHARGE THEM UNTIL THEY ACTUALLY ARE FORMED AS A, AS A POLICE DEPARTMENT. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM [7.S. Renewal Agreement between Parker County and Texas Workforce Commission and PCSO and take any action the court deems necessary. (John Forrest / Judge Deen)] MS AND RENEWAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARKER COUNTY AND TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, PARKER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND TAKE ANY ACTION COURT TEAM IS NECESSARY. AND THIS IS A CONTINUATION CONTRACT AND IT'S FOR A DATA SHARING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND THE WORKFORCE COMMISSION. AND JUST ASK FOR APPROVAL ON A CONTINUATION CONTRACT. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH [7.T. Order 25-14 for the disposition by cremation of a pauper and authorize payment of $850 to Galbreaith Pickard Funeral Chapel & Cremation Services for disposition of an indigent person. (John Forrest / Judge Deen)] ITEM T ORDER 25 DASH 14 FOR THE DISPOSITION OF A CREMATION OF A PROPER AND AUTHORIZED PAYMENT. $850 TO GOBERT PICKER FUNERAL CHAPEL AND CREMATION SERVICES FOR DISPOSITION OF AN INT PERSON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN PAPER CARRIE FIVE OH. MOVE TO [8. ACCEPT INTO THE MINUTES] ITEM EIGHT ON ACCEPT INTO THE MINUTES UNDER ITEM A, PARKER COUNTY IT DEPARTMENT COURT OF REPORT. ITEM B EXECUTED AUTOMATIC BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION AUTO RANCH FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS. ITEM C EXECUTED AUTOMATIC BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION. SHOTTEN KIRK WEATHERFORD, S-H-W-L-S-C-D-V-A, WEATHERFORD HONDA FOR AUTO REGISTRATION, AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS. ITEM D EXECUTED AUTOMATIC BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION. HANS AUTO SALES FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS. ITEM E EXECUTED AUTOMATIC BANK DRAFT AUTHORIZATION REDNECK INNOVATION, LLC FOR AUTO REGISTRATION TRANSACTIONS. RECORD NOTE, THOSE ARE IN BE PUT IN THE MINUTES. WE HAVE DONE NONE. I I THINK ITEM SIX WE TECHNICALLY HAVEN'T DISCUSSED YET. THAT SHOULD BE JUST THAT EMAIL THAT Y'ALL SENT OUT. Y'ALL DID SEND US THE PRESENTATION. YEAH, SO THERE SHOULDN'T BE ANY ACTION NEEDED. OH, I'M SORRY I WENT RIGHT PAST THAT, DIDN'T I? YEAH, THERE SENT OUT AN EMAIL ON THAT. MY APOLOGIES. I WENT RIGHT PAST THAT. I THINK IN MY MIND WHAT, WHAT THAT WAS THE GIST OF IT WAS WAS 99.9% OF THAT MEETING WAS ON SPECIFIC COUNTIES RELATING TO DART AND HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH PARKER COUNTY. SO THERE'S NO, WE GOT AN EMAIL. WE GOT AN EMAIL. THAT LINE OKAY. YEAH, I'M JUST, MY APOLOGIES FOR OVER OVERLOOKING THAT. THAT TAKES US DOWN TO ITEM 10 ON [10.A. PRECINCT 1] PLAS. GIVE Y'ALL A MOMENT TO GET READY. ALL RIGHT, KAREN, COME ON UP HERE AND LAY IT ON US. WE'LL PROBABLY DO A LOT FASTER THIS TIME THIS WEEK. YEAH, WE'LL GO TO ITEM 10 A ONE. I'LL JUST GO AHEAD AND START UNDER ITEM ONE, APPROVE THE AMENDMENT FOR MYERS RANCH CONSISTS OF 53.138 ACRES LOCATED PRECINCT ONE. THIS AMENDMENT IS UH, JUST TO CORRECT, UH, TWO LOTS THAT WERE DUPLICATED LOTS 35 AND 36 ON UH, MEYER'S RANCH. COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR, UH, YES, THIS IS A NUT PROTON CORRECTION ON A SCRIBNER'S ERROR, SO IT SHOULD BE APPROVED. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CURIOUS FIVE OH ITEM TWO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION BEING KNOWN AS CC ACRES CONSISTENT OF 3.116 ACRES DIVIDED BY A SI CONTRACTING LLC LOCATED OFF OF PRAIRIE HILL COURT WITH WALNUT CREEK IN PRECINCT ONE. THIS IS A REVISION FOR LOT, UH, SEVEN. THEY'RE GONNA SPLIT IT INTO THREE LOTS WITH, UH, WALNUT CREEK. UH, LOT ONE'S GOING TO BE 1.016 ACRES LOT. UH, SEVEN R TWO IS GONNA BE 1.097 LOT. SEVEN R THREE IS 1.003 ACRES AND IT IS LOCATED OFF OF PRAIRIE HILL COURT. COUNSELOR, EVERYTHING GOOD FOR, UH, REVISION PURPOSES AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER TO BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS. OKAY, MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALE. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIE FIVE OH MOVE [10.B. PRECINCT 2 (Part 2 of 2)] TO ITEM B PRECINCT TWO. ITEM ONE, APPROVE THE FINAL PLAN FOR SUBDIVISION BEING KNOWN AS BRADSHAW ROAD ADDITION CONSISTENT OF 2.997 ACRES DEVELOPED BY AMBITION GROUP LLC LOCATED OFF OF CHAMP LANE WITH WARNOCK CREEK SUD IN PRECINCT TWO. UH, THIS IS A NEW SUBDIVISION, UH, WITH TWO LOTS AND LOT ONE'S GONNA BE 1.499 ACRES, LOT TWO IS GONNA BE 1.498 ACRES AND UM, THEY'RE GOING TO SAIL BOTH LOTS. COUNSEL, WE GOOD FOR THIS. THE DEVELOPER HAS PROVIDED A TAX CERTIFICATE INDICATING A ZERO BALANCE PERMITTING HAS APPROVED PUBLIC WATER THROUGH WALNUT CREEK AND PRIVATE WASTE DISPOSAL, AND THEY HAVE MET ALL [01:45:01] OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? FOLLOW PAPER. CURIOUS BY VOTE. MOVE TO ITEM TWO, BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION. BE KNOWN AS CHURCH OF GOD CAMPGROUND IN THE ETJ, CITY OF WEATHERFORD CONSISTS OF 2.492 ACRES DEVELOPED BY THE CHURCH OF GOD, STATE OF TEXAS LOCATED OFF OF FORT WORTH, HIGHWAY 180 WITH CITY OF WEATHERFORD WATER AND PRECINCT TWO. UH, THIS ONE, UH, THEY'RE GOING TO DO, THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLA IS TO, UH, WE GOTTA HAVE A, UM, SEPTIC SYSTEM PUT IN THE NEW CHILDREN'S AREA AND THEY'RE REQUESTING TO HAVE, UH, A REVISION OF THE SLOT TO, UH, AR THAT'S GOING TO BE 2.492 ACRES. COUNSEL, ARE WE GOOD? AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER FOR REVISION PROCESS. DID WE GET INFORMATION FROM THE CITY, UM, RELEASING US TO REVIEW THIS ONE ON THIS? I WAS GONNA DOUBLE CHECK. OKAY. AND THE CITY HAS RELEASED AUTHORITY TO THE COUNTY MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. FURTHER DISCUSSION, ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE VOTE. MOVE TO ITEM THREE. APPROVE THE WAIVER FOR GROUNDWATER STUDY IN SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS MAD ACRES. CONSIST OF 2.893 ACRES WITH TWO LOTS DEVELOPED BY CARL AND JENNIFER MADISON IN PRECINCT TWO. AND THE PURPOSE OF THIS SPLIT IS FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES. THEY'RE NOT GONNA SELL OR ANYTHING. UM, ON LOT ONE IS AN EXISTING OLD WELL, AND I COULDN'T FIND THE, UH, WELL REPORT FOR IT AND THE OTHER ACREAGE DOES NOT HAVE A WELL, BUT I GOT THE CLOSEST NEIGHBOR AND, UM, THEIR, UH, THE YIELD IS 15 GMPS, UH, WITH THE BOJO IS 7.875. AND THEY, YOU SAID THEY'RE NOT BUILDING A OR THEY'RE NOT DRILLING A NEW WALL? UH, NO, THEY ARE, UH, UM, THEY'RE HAVING TO, UH, DIVIDE THEIR PROPERTY DUE TO, UH, THE INSURANCE FOR THEIR ONE OF THEM. UH, HIS BUILDING IS ON A, UH, THE OTHER LOT AND HE HAS A, A BUSINESS IN THAT BUILDING AND INSURANCE IS MAKING THEM CHANGE. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER. HOLD A SECOND. BY, OH, EXCUSE ME, COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE. OH, MOVE TO ITEM FOUR, APPROVE THE WAIVER FOR THE GROUNDWATER STUDY AND A SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS HUD BUCHANAN ACRES IN THE ETJ. CITY OF WEATHERFORD CONSISTS OF 2.5 ACRES WITH ONE LOT DEVELOPED BY LISA NICHOLAS AND PRECINCT TWO. AND THIS IS ANOTHER ONE LOT RULE SUBDIVISION. UH, THAT'S 2.5 ACRES, UH, OUT CUT OUT OF A TREK OF 11 ACRES. I MEAN OUT OF A 13.5 ACRES LEADING AT A 11 ACRES. UH, AND IT'S OFF OF WEST LAMBERT ROAD. AND UH, WE JUST WANNA GET THIS, THERE'S NO WELL ON WHAT, UH, ONE AND UH, WE DO THAT. ANY MOTION BACK? UH, COMMISSIONER HOLT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN FOR DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIE FIVE OH MOVE TO ITEM FIVE, APPROVE THE WAIVER FOR GROUNDWATER STUDY AND SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS SHADOW HILLS CONSIST OF 4.08 ACRES WITH TWO LOTS IN PRECINCT TWO. THIS LOT HERE IS LONG AS UH, ONE THAT THE COUNTY IS PURCHASING. DO YOU WANNA ? YEAH, SO THE ITEMS FIVE AND SIX ARE BASICALLY WHERE WE'RE TAKING, WE WE OWN LOT ONE, LOT TWO. WE ARE KIND OF DOING A LITTLE BIT OF LAND SWAP WITH WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO. WE'RE GONNA GET SOME OF LOT TWO, THEY'RE GONNA GET SOME OF LOT ONE SO THAT WE CAN ADJUST THE PATH OF THE INTERSECT FM NINE 20 TO A MUCH SAFER LOCATION. OKAY, MOTION HOL SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE? FIVE OH ITEM SIX. BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS SHA HILLS CONSISTENT OF 4.08 ACRES DEVELOPED BY PARKER COUNTY PRECINCT TWO. TROY AND KATIE PETROSKI WITH WHITEWATER PRECINCT TWO. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HOLT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, VARIOUS. FIVE. I MOVE TO ITEM SEVEN, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE ESCROW FUNDS FOR AMBER MEADOWS, PAGE FOUR AND CLAREMONT PHASE FIVE. AND AUTHORIZE THE COURT TO APPROVE PAYMENT AND TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY. UH, IS JOHN, ARE WE GOOD TO DO THIS? IT'S JUST A RELEASE. YES. MR. UH, COMMISSIONER HOLT. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH. MOVE TO ITEM EIGHT. CONSIDER, DISCUSS AND ACT UPON THE CHANGE OF POSTING A SPEED LIMIT SIGN [01:50:01] AND SHAILA ROAD IN PRECINCT TWO AND TAKE ANY ACTION IN THE COURT DEEMED NECESSARY IT AS A PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING AT 1153. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM EIGHT AND PRECINCT TWO? THE RECORD SHOW? THAT'S 1153 HERE ON SCENE NINE. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 1153 AND GO TO THE ITEM. SO SHADE'S CURRENTLY 40 MILES AN HOUR. UH, THAT'S KIND OF CRAZY CONSIDERING HOW MUCH DEVELOPMENT IT IS. IT'S A, IT'S A SMALL WINDING NARROW RESIDENTIAL ROAD. I'D LIKE TO ASK THE COURT TO DROP TO 30 MILES AN HOUR. OKAY. MOTION MAY BY COMMISSIONER HOLT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION AND PROPER NOTES WAS PLACED IN NEWSPAPER? LISTEN, DATE, TIME, LOCATION, PURPOSE OF THE HEARING TODAY. ALL THOSE IN WE NEVER DOUBTED YOU. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? YOU NEED TO SPEAK UP JOHN. I HOLD CARRIE'S FIVE. OH, MOVE TO ITEMS. OKAY, BACK ON. WE'VE ALREADY DONE NINE. SO WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM C. [10.C. PRECINCT 3] PRECINCT THREE. ITEM ONE. SORRY, I JUST TOOK THAT ASSUMPTION. SORRY ABOUT THAT. ITEM ONE, BEGIN THE REVISION PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION BE KNOWN AS MONT MOUNTAIN RIVER ESTATES. CONSISTENT 1.463 ACRES FOLLOWED BY MIKE MODIA LOCATED OFF OF RIVERVIEW WITH CSWR IN TEXAS UDC IN PRECINCT THREE. THIS LITTLE SUBDIVISION HE'S COMBINING OF LOTS 32 WITH 30 PART OF 34 TO MAKE IT, UH, A 0.55 ACRE. AND THEN HE'S GOING TO, UH, COMBINE LOTS 30, PULL THE REST OF 34, 36 AND 38 TO MAKE A 0.913 ACRES. THIS SUBDIVISION IS AN OLD SUBDIVISION AND ROLLS SMALL LOTS, SO HE'S COMBINING LOTS. JOHN, DO WE HAVE EVERYTHING IN PLACE TO BEGIN THE PROCESS? MOTION TO BE BY COMMISSIONER WALTON. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIED BY VOTE. MOVE TO ITEM TWO. BEGIN THE REVISION BY MEETS AND BALANCE PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION, BE KNOWN AS WESTRIDGE ESTATE CONSISTENT OF 4.486 ACRES DEVELOPED BY SME SALON LOCATED OFF OF OLD DENNIS ROAD, LOUISVILLE WATER SOURCE CITY OF WEATHERFORD AND PRECINCT THREE. UM, WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS ONE IS, HE'S MOVING HIS INSIDE PROPERTY LINE. UH, HE HAS A, A BARN ON ONE PART AND HE'S MOVING HIS PROPERTY LINE SO IT'LL ALL BE ON ONE LOT. 25 WILL EVERYTHING TO BEGIN THE PROCESS AND WEATHERFORD DID DEFER THIS TO PARKER COUNTY BEING IN THEIR ETJ AND EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WAL AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HOLT. FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE FIVE OH MOVE [10.D. PRECINCT 4 (Part 2 of 2)] TO ITEM D PRECINCT FOUR. ITEM ONE. APPROVE THE VARIANCE FROM THE PARKER COUNTY SUBDIVISION RULES AND REGULATIONS AND PARKER COUNTY OSSF RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR LOT SIX R ONE AND SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS THE CHANGE OF TOWS. PLATTED IN 1973 AND TAKE ANY ACCIDENT THE COURT DEEMS NECESSARY PRECINCT FOUR ON THIS LOT. WE ARE GOING TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE TO DO A HALF ACRE. AND ON THAT HALF ACRE IT'S FENCED OFF AND THERE'S A WATER TOWER SO IT WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR ANY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION OR SEPTIC SYSTEM AND THEY KNOW THAT, BUT THERE'S CURRENTLY A WATER TOWER ON THE HALF ACRE PART. SO PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY. ARE THERE MULTIPLE WELLS THERE TOO? YEAH, THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO WELLS AND IT'S A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY AND UH, MR. HELL AND I BOTH HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN ON SITE AND, YOU KNOW, SEEN IT HIT SEVERAL TIMES. YEAH, . OKAY, SO YOU HAVE EVERYTHING IN ORDER. YEAH, I GUESS EVERYTHING IS MOTION MOVED BY COMMISSIONER HEALTH SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. FURTHER THE DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, CARRIE? I VOTE. ITEM TWO BEGIN THEIR REVISION PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS CHEN AU SYSTEM OF 2.649 ACRES DEVELOPED BY PA DURO SERVICES INCORPORATED IN OH 3 3 1 HOLDINGS LOCATED OFF OF BRANDON DRIVE IN PALO DURO WATER COUNT COMPANY IN PRECINCT FOUR. AND THIS SUBDIVISION IS THE ONE WE JUST WAS SPEAKING ABOUT AND IT'S UH, FOR LOT FIVE R IT'S GOING TO BE 2.149 ACRES AND LOT SIX R ONE IS A HALF ACRE. YOU HAVE EVERYTHING IN ORDER? UH, YES. EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER. THIS COMBINED THREE LOTS AND LEFT THAT HA HALF ACRE OUT FOR THE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CARRIES FIVE OH. MOVE TO ITEM THREE. APPROVE THE ADDENDUM FOR ROAD REPAIRS. QUAIL RIDGE WITH THE TOWN OF MANTA NORTH. TAKE ANY ACTION THE COURT NEEDS NECESSARY. HAVE EVERYTHING IN ORDER. THE ADDENDUM IS PROPER. READY FOR APPROVAL. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER [01:55:01] HALE. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR HERE. FIVE OH ITEM FOUR, RELEASE THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR ALITO RIVER AND ACCEPT ALEDO RIVER AS A COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AND PROCEED. FOUR. AND DION HAS INSPECTED THAT ROAD, SO IT LOOKS GOOD. YEAH. WE SHOULD LEAD BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OF DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? SORRY TO CUT YOU OFF, COMMISSIONER. NO, IT'S OKAY. I WAS GONNA SAY WE INSPECTED IT AND IT WAS GOOD. OKAY. ITEM FIVE. APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF HUDSON OAKS FOR ROAD REPAIRS AND TAKE ANY ACTION COURT NEEDS NECESSARY. EVERYTHING GOOD WITH THAT AGREEMENT? UH, EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER. OKAY. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIE FIVE VOTE. MOVE TO ITEM SIX. APPROVE THE ADDENDUM FOR ROAD REPAIRS FOR THE TITLE ANNETTA. TAKE ANY ACTION ACCORDINGLY. NECESSARY AGREEMENT IN THE ORDER. EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER HALE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONLEY. ANY OF THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR CURIOUS FIVE VOTE I WOULD MOVE TO ITEM 11. ASK FOR A MOTION MOVE TO ADJOURN. OKAY. THE RECORDS SHOW THAT WE'LL ADJOURN AT 1159. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.